Yea but who cares about how OT believers were saved or not? Isnt our charge to offer Christ exclusively on the basis that He is able to save them who call on Him? The rest of this is just a conversation.
Im sure Biblicist, Old Regular etc having years of training & study, can give you the OT answer to your question. I dont even bother to concern myself with it. For today, we preach Christ Crucified & we preach Him to everyone. Therefore my concern, what I was charged with in the Great Commission, ..... to spread the free offering of the gospel by sharing it with all who will listen & to support the belief that Christ is able to save all who come to God through Him in faith.
Well, it matters quite a bit to me. One of the reasons I cannot embrace TULIP is for this very reason of the new birth. For I gathered from the conversation on this board that TULIP holds to the pov that God must give the person a rebirth, ie new heart, or they cannot and will not believe. If this is NOT the case, then it is understood that men like Abraham was saved according to their own exercise of faith and not because God gave them a new heart first.
My TULIP friend in my church then seems to not be alone here, for I see that you also at the least are not sure about the OT saints on the issue of rebirth.
This is why I asked in the OP, is there an "official" position found in the definitions of TULIP??