Since Awaken refuses to answer or cannot answer, I'll supply the answer and the explanation, which I have given to Awaken before, and I'll expect the same results. Nevertheless, these are the facts:
The Holy Spirit was delayed being given in Samaria, in Acts 8, because this was the FIRST TIME the Gospel had been received by non-Jews, and also since these were Samaritans, whom the Jews hated, the HS was delayed in being given until Peter and John could be there to witness firsthand that the Gospel was indeed for these Samaritans.
In Acts 10, the HS was delayed in being given to Cornelius and those with him until Peter went and saw firsthand that the Gospel was for the Gentiles.
There was only ONE TIME when the Gospel was for the FIRST TIME presented to and received by the Samaritans, and there was only ONE TIME when the Gospel was for the FIRST TIME presented to and received by Gentiles.
In Acts 19, the HS was delayed in being given because these were NOT Christian disciples but only disciples of John who had only received John's baptism. When Paul preached Jesus to them, they accepted Jesus, were water baptized, and received the HS baptism.
These three instances are all unique, one-time events. There was only one first time that the Gospel was first received by the Samaritans, and only one first time that it was received by the Gentiles. Both of these times God required witnesses to the fact so that the Jews would believe the Gospel was for these people and not solely for the Jews, thus the delay in the giving of the HS baptism until the apostles could be there to witness it firsthand. As for the other instance, these were not even Christian disciples; they needed to believe in Jesus first before they could be given the baptism in the Holy Spirit.
So, these were unique, one-time events that could not be repeated since there was only one time that the Gospel was FIRST received by Samaritans and Gentiles. And yet what do the Charismatics do? They take these one time-events and try to make them normative for all Christians! The only way they can do this is to completely ignore the context and the plain meaning of these events. That is what Awaken does, and what they all do, to try to make scripture fit their so-called experience and their experience fit scripture which it does not.
Now that's not even touching on tongues but only the three instances where the gift of the HS was delayed.
As for tongues, this is mentioned only three times in the Book of Acts. The three references to tongues there indicate clearly that it was given purely as a witness to the proclamation of the Gospel. On Pentecost Day, it was one of the signs to convince Israel that Jesus is Savior and Lord. In the home of Cornelius, it helped to show Peter that the Gospel is for the Gentile as well as the Jews. At Ephesus in Acts 19, it served to persuade the disciples of John the Baptist that the Christian era had replaced the Johannine era.
There you have it. These are the scriptural facts. This is what all Christians have known and taught for 1900 years, until Parham and Seymour invented the Pentecostal movement based on occult practices.
Scripture does not support Pentecostalism, as I have clearly shown. Pentecostals have to mangle scripture and ignore context to claim that their doctrines have a scriptural basis which they do not. Further, scripture knows nothing of a private prayer language the way Charismatics teach it.
The conclusion: Charismatic/Pentecostal doctrine is false doctrine.
Every believer since these unique, first-time/one-time/only-time events receives the baptism of the HS at conversion. There is NO HS baptism separate from and subsequent to conversion which not all Christians have or which they must seek. Christian believers do NOT have to seek it because ALL believers receive the HS baptism when they come to faith in Jesus Christ and are converted. And tongues is not the evidence of this HS baptism which all Christians receive. No, the fruit of the Spirit is the evidence of being baptized in the Spirit.
All this HS baptism with evidence of tongues is a tribally conditioned and learned behavior. I have seen how it is acquired. There is nothing genuine about it. It is non-scriptural, anti-scriptural, false, and fake, the product of false teachers and gullible, willfully deceived minds.