Hi Darrel C, 1 Corinthians 2:6-11 supports my view of 1 Corinthians 2:14-3:3.
We agree God must provide the grace of His revelation for us to have something to put our faith in. However, this enlightening is by presenting God's Word, the gospel of Christ, for it is the power of salvation.
You say our revelation is revealed by the "Spirit of God." But this could mean (1) any of the various methods of communication such as the spoken word, the written word, visions and dreams, or (2) the supernatural alteration of our ability to understand God's revelation.
I believe the Holy Spirit reveals God via number 1. Note verse 13 where Paul "speaks" the spiritual things given to him by the Spirit of God. Thus revealing them to others, including natural men.
In summary Paul says the Natural Man cannot understand spiritual meat, the stuff where we need to be indwelt to understand with the aid of the leading of our Helper, but Natural Man can understand spiritual milk, the fundamentals of the gospel, which Paul received from the Spirit of God.
The parable (Matthew 13:1-23) is explained and thus cannot be dismissed, three of the four soils could understand the milk of the gospel. The idea is that natural man can be cultivated planted, watered and chosen. Many are called but few are chosen. The first soil had little or no cultivation, no understanding of the milk of the gospel. The other three did understand, but accepted it to various degrees. And this acceptance can take years, years of cultivation and watering.
Those that walk away, were never saved, Jesus says "I never knew you" not I knew you once, but you drifted away." Thus their faith was never credited as righteousness, and they were never put in Christ, the sanctifying work of the Spirit.
It does not matter that John was writing to believers or believers and non-believers, either way the idea is anyone who is believing according to God has been born anew. Anyone who is believing but God has not credited his or her faith has righteousness, has not been born anew.
You are not saved because Christ died. Lots of folks are in Hades, even though Jesus died as a ransom for all. You are saved because God credited your faith as righteousness and put you spiritually "in Christ" where you were washed with His blood and born anew. You have "received" the reconciliation provided by Christ's death on the cross.
God's inspired words were written down, using the grammar embedded in the spelling of the words, i.e. the syntax and inflection. Now we in modern times think the Greek scholars have a handle on the grammar and thus are able to convey the intended message according to both the grammar and the word meanings. If a person alters the grammar in order to change the message to be consistent with their own doctrine, they are making the Word of God to no effect.
We agree God must provide the grace of His revelation for us to have something to put our faith in. However, this enlightening is by presenting God's Word, the gospel of Christ, for it is the power of salvation.
You say our revelation is revealed by the "Spirit of God." But this could mean (1) any of the various methods of communication such as the spoken word, the written word, visions and dreams, or (2) the supernatural alteration of our ability to understand God's revelation.
I believe the Holy Spirit reveals God via number 1. Note verse 13 where Paul "speaks" the spiritual things given to him by the Spirit of God. Thus revealing them to others, including natural men.
In summary Paul says the Natural Man cannot understand spiritual meat, the stuff where we need to be indwelt to understand with the aid of the leading of our Helper, but Natural Man can understand spiritual milk, the fundamentals of the gospel, which Paul received from the Spirit of God.
The parable (Matthew 13:1-23) is explained and thus cannot be dismissed, three of the four soils could understand the milk of the gospel. The idea is that natural man can be cultivated planted, watered and chosen. Many are called but few are chosen. The first soil had little or no cultivation, no understanding of the milk of the gospel. The other three did understand, but accepted it to various degrees. And this acceptance can take years, years of cultivation and watering.
Those that walk away, were never saved, Jesus says "I never knew you" not I knew you once, but you drifted away." Thus their faith was never credited as righteousness, and they were never put in Christ, the sanctifying work of the Spirit.
It does not matter that John was writing to believers or believers and non-believers, either way the idea is anyone who is believing according to God has been born anew. Anyone who is believing but God has not credited his or her faith has righteousness, has not been born anew.
God crediting our faith as righteousness means the righteousness of our faith is not our own. God took our faith, as flawed as a dirty rag, and declared it righteous. This does not result in us being righteous. When God then puts us in Christ, the sanctifying work of the Spirit, where we undergo the circumcision of Christ, and arise in Christ a new creature, then we are perfect, holy and blameless. It is only after undergoing being born anew spiritually that we are righteous in the eyes of God.The question is, do we not ultimately view our righteousness as not our own?
You are not saved because Christ died. Lots of folks are in Hades, even though Jesus died as a ransom for all. You are saved because God credited your faith as righteousness and put you spiritually "in Christ" where you were washed with His blood and born anew. You have "received" the reconciliation provided by Christ's death on the cross.
Certainly but that belief has not been credited as righteousness, and that person has not been put in Christ, undergone the circumcision of Christ, and arisen a new creation. You are describing the Matthew 7 guys, that Christ never knew.All in all, I do not discount the possibility that one can believe and yet not be born again.
God's inspired words were written down, using the grammar embedded in the spelling of the words, i.e. the syntax and inflection. Now we in modern times think the Greek scholars have a handle on the grammar and thus are able to convey the intended message according to both the grammar and the word meanings. If a person alters the grammar in order to change the message to be consistent with their own doctrine, they are making the Word of God to no effect.
Last edited by a moderator: