Featured Tell me what you think

That is good advice. I had a bolder font, but when I tested it on some browsers, the quality degrades, and looks bad.

Perhaps if I reversed the colors, and had a white box with black font?

 

Yeah...no it doesn't. You might think it looks bad, but it does not look like a site with a bunch of highlighted yellow text.

You have already said you don't like the yellow. We get it.

Actually, it is. You referenced subpoint fonts on the left, he is referring to the white text on black background on the right. I don't believe he said the text on the left was difficult to see.

 

Not defensive just because I don't agree with you.

Actually, its completely different. He wanted a bolder font on the dark background...the fonts you are referencing are bigger, and are already a bold font.

I understand if you cannot read it, I just don't understand why. Do you have poor vision? The text is a bold, large, bright font. I am not sure how its possible to get it to stand out more.

Yeah, but his comment made sense. He is talking about a non-bolded white font, on a black background, in 12 point font. I looked at it, and said, "Yeah, that is kinda hard to read." You are talking about a bolded 14 point font, that I look at, and say "How can that be hard for anyone to read?"

Frankly, I am beginning to see why you drew similarities between this:

Horribly disorganized site with displaced highlighted text

and this:

Well Organized site, with color scheme and content you don't personally like


Have you even looked at the site since I redid it? Just curious.

 

Thanks for the input! I am going to work on the white on black font. I think I am going to make all the text boxes white; it seems to look good on the one page I have it already.

 

Thanks! The bottom text is meant to be unreadable. It is to improve search engine optimization. I would change it to yellow, so it is completely hidden, but the search engines (most of them) are programmed to ignore text that is the same color as the background.

 

I am doing a couple of adjustments...scattering some darker images and watermarks in the background, and adjusting the text boxes a bit.

 

Its called sarcasm.

Anyone that looks at that shirt, and says, "That person is seriously wanting to kill abortion proponents" needs to be hit in the head with a tack hammer.

I bet if someone made a shirt that said, "If you think Works like circumcision saves you, why don't you go ahead and emasculate yourself?" People would be saying, "That is so unchristian!" ...even though the apostle Paul said it under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit.

 

You might think so. I think they are exactly what is called for...I think that wishy-washy, touchy feel-y, politically correct, "Hallmark Christianity" needs to DIE.


Paul was pretty extreme when he told the circumcision party to emasculate themselves. Or when he called Elymas an enemy of righteousness, and struck him blind. Nowadays, folks like yourself would look at Paul, and tell him he just needs to "be nice" and "love people into the kingdom."

Jesus was RUDE. Paul was DIRECT. We should follow their examples, not teachings of Postmodernism. :tonofbricks:

 

Sorry, I am just doing too many things at once. I read you wrong.

 

But if the content for sale is good enough, and what someone wants (particularly for cheap church media/videos), I think someone that did not like the site, would still tolerate it, to purchase something they really wanted/needed.

For instance, a nice ppt video loop On sermon spice, can cost upwards of 12 dollars a piece. Not even getting into the content issue (which is the main driver of the site), If I am able to produce videos of equal quality, and sell them for 3 dollars (which is about all the producers on Sermon Spice end up with, because of the overhead and fees), wouldn't you tolerate the site for a few minutes a week, to save 9 bucks?