He does have an excellent point when it comes to pressing one’s theological positions on others. I would be cautious because it seems that this principle of his extends to Scripture itself. He presents the Hebrews as viewing and studying God through the Laws and prophets. This is true. But the Laws and prophets also carried God’s revelation (God, after He spoke long ago to the fathers in the prophets in many portions and in many ways…). We should not separate this perspective from the Gospel, but should understand God’s Word within the context He provided. I am not sure that this is the intent of “Charismatic Apologist,” but separating the Gospel from its historical context is often a goal of emerging theology. Theirs is not “what does this mean,” but “what does this mean to us,” which is error. Theology absolutely does not depend on our personal view of God. Our personal view of God should be derived from our study of God (not the other way around).
Well said and I labeled him Charismatic but should have labeled him Emergent as I did in my first reply to him on FB.