Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Do the animals we see today look completely different than how they looked in the garden? What need would have there been for fangs, claws, horns and camouflage pattern fur and skin pre death?
I've discussed this topic with some friends before. A lot of it depends on your stance of "death entered the world" meaning the world in general or mankind. Seeing as animals do not have souls in need of salvation, would they have been under the same restrictions as humanity during those early times? You can add in another variable by questioning how long Adam and Eve were in the Garden.
On that issue, I've heard some people argue that they were in the garden less than a week. Others I've heard argue for countless years. (Please note, these are friends of mine, not published authors or high-ranking theologians.) Depending on which answer you side with will determine some of your belief on animals. Did animals die prior to man falling from grace? After all, animals never had grace to fall from.
It's a fun topic to discuss, so long as people remain civil about it.
It seems odd to me that those who argue most vehemently against evolution, then argue that animals had to change (i.e. evolve) with tremendous rapidity after the fall of man.
Rob
Do the animals we see today look completely different than how they looked in the garden? What need would have there been for fangs, claws, horns and camouflage pattern fur and skin pre death?
Do the animals we see today look completely different than how they looked in the garden?
What need would have there been for fangs, claws, horns and camouflage pattern fur and skin pre death?
Since death entered the world through sin, where did they get their meat? What need is there to hide in a sinless world?No, why would they? Does anybody actually argue that animals have evolved since the fall from vegetarians to carnivores?
Indeed, what need would there be? Why does a shark have jagged teeth? To filter plankton?
Since death entered the world through sin, where did they get their meat? What need is there to hide in a sinless world?
Romans 5:12 says death entered the world through sin.The Bible says that death spread to men because of sin. It's possible there was animal death before Adam's sin. Why would a lion need fangs and claws, why would a shark need a set of teeth for tearing flesh?
I've discussed this topic with some friends before. A lot of it depends on your stance of "death entered the world" meaning the world in general or mankind. Seeing as animals do not have souls in need of salvation, would they have been under the same restrictions as humanity during those early times?
Come on, Rev... let's keep things nice and friendly. :love2:That is a cop out.
Questions like the one you asked are not really addressed in the text because it wouldn’t matter to those to whom the scriptures were originally written for.
That idea carries on into the NT as well. That question wouldn't pertain to the salvation of man and is inconsequencial to the theological application of scripture, the provision of Jesus Christ to deal with the problem of man's separation from God.
Just sayin...
Rob
Come on, Rev... let's keep things nice and friendly. :love2:
Use nice words to express your meaning and explain it in ways that reason things out for us.
God is not inhibited but he is accommodating.
Rob
I guess I'm a softy, you're forgiven of my weakness.I did not mean for that to sound as it now appears to me it could My apologies. The point stands however.
What do you think God meant when in Job He said He hung the earth on nothing.
Come on, Rev... let's keep things nice and friendly. :love2:
Use nice words to express your meaning and explain it in ways that reason things out for us.
God is not inhibited but he is accommodating.
Rob
I did not mean for that to sound as it now appears to me it could My apologies. The point stands however.
:thumbsup::thumbsup::thumbsup: