White Supremacy Threads?

[Darrell C]

Okay, simple question: do the members here feel it is acceptable for white supremacy threads to be started?

For example:

"Black People are Not Human."

"Blacks Ruining this Country."

"All Blacks on Welfare."

"Black Privilege."


I would ask that there be only responses on the Topic.


God bless.

 

[Revmitchell]

Nobody is doing that.

 

[Zaac]

This thread has nothing to do with the Politics forum.

 

[Darrell C]

Nobody is doing that.

Answer the question.


God bless.

 

[Darrell C]

This thread has nothing to do with the Politics forum.

So White Supremacy is not a political issue?

You feel it is a spiritual issue, maybe?

Answer the question.


God bless.

 

[Darrell C]

So far, 3 votes for no.

Perhaps one of the voters could expand on their vote and give a good reason why?


God bless.

 

[carpro]

Answer the question.


God bless.

You don't have an N/A answer in your poll.

As it is right now, it's a hypothetical poll.

 

[Darrell C]

You don't have an N/A answer in your poll.

As it is right now, it's a hypothetical poll.

"Not Applicable" isn't an answer.

Answer the question.

It's not hypothetical, it's a simple question.

The only reason not to answer is the same reason why answers to other simple questions are not forth-coming...because it exposes the hypocrites and false so-called theologies and ideologies.

Answer the question. It's a simple yes or no question.


God bless.

 

[Revmitchell]

The only reason not to answer is the same reason why answers to other simple questions are not forth-coming...because it exposes the hypocrites and false so-called theologies and ideologies.

This is just false. Look a lot of us have been posting together for a number of years. We know each other. While you joined in 2010 your posting much is relatively new. You do not really know anyone. You need to take a step back and get some fresh air. This idea that if others do not agree with your poor resolution to things can only mean one thing in the worst possible light is not only wrongheaded but it is poor logic. You are looking very silly right now. Take a break and come back when you get yourself together. You might also start off with an apology as well.

God bless.

Given your rhetoric this is not appropriate.

 

[carpro]

"Not Applicable" isn't an answer.

Answer the question.

No. But since it's a hypothetical poll, it would have been advisable.

Hypothetical poll questions can only be answered ...well...hypothetically.

N/A would be a really good choice to have. So would "It Depends" or "Maybe"

 

[Darrell C]

Originally Posted by Darrell C View Post
The only reason not to answer is the same reason why answers to other simple questions are not forth-coming...because it exposes the hypocrites and false so-called theologies and ideologies.

This is just false.

Not only is it true is it likely the very thing that bothers you and causes you to turn a simple question into something personal.

Just answer the question.

Look a lot of us have been posting together for a number of years. We know each other. While you joined in 2010 your posting much is relatively new.

Relevance?

Answer the questions. If I want advice on how to participate on Doctrinal Discussion forums...I'll ask those that set a good example of Doctrinal Purity and loyalty to the Word of God and it's teachings.

Answer the question or be viewed as hypocritical.

You do not really know anyone.

Sure I do, because I have met you and your buddies in nearly every forum I have been on.

Answer the question.

You need to take a step back and get some fresh air.

I'm not the one that has been stagnating on the same forum, likely expressing the same things over and over, lol. If I check your posting, will I see anything different in your positions over the years?

Do you really think duration of membership matters in Doctrinal Debate?

Answer the question.

This idea that if others do not agree with your poor resolution to things can only mean one thing in the worst possible light is not only wrongheaded but it is poor logic.

Agreeing with me has nothing to do with.

And just to remind you this thread is about whether it would be okay for a white supremacist to post threads that are racially contentious.

You are getting your threads confused.

Now answer the question.

You are looking very silly right now.

I can live with that.



Answer the question.

Take a break and come back when you get yourself together.

You might think about taking your own advice.

Answer the question.

You might also start off with an apology as well.

I am truly sorry that you have such a limited ability to discern the issues we are discussing.

Answer the question.

God bless.

Given your rhetoric this is not appropriate.

Well, if I were seeking your approval, or the approval of your buddies, that might mean something. But since you have disqualified yourself as someone who might have something to contribute to Doctrinal Discussion, I'm afraid I'll have to lump that assessment in with your others.

Are you going to answer the question or not?

If not, then go back to the other thread, lol. That one has run it's course and provided the information it sought.

Now I would like to focus on the "gang's" views about a white supremacist posting threads such as those listed in the OP.

The only reason not to engage this conversation would be fear of exposure.

So answer the question or find another thread.


God bless.

 

[Darrell C]

No.

Thanks. Now will you clarify why not?

But since it's a hypothetical poll, it would have been advisable.

It's not a hypothetical poll. A white supremacist can at any time show up and post such threads. And because there is a precedent with a black supremacist, it would be hypocritical for this to be disallowed.

So drop hypothesis from the equation, it is not relevant.

And between these two threads it seems you want to say racially contentious threads are okay for some, but not for others.

Perhaps you meant to say hypocritical rather than hypothetical....

Hypothetical poll questions can only be answered ...well...hypothetically.

How is it hypothetical?

There is a factual precedent despite the fact it is from the other side of that fence.

N/A would be a really good choice to have.

Good for those that want to dismiss the topic.

N/A is not applicable.

It is a simple question that can be answered with a yes or no.

So would "It Depends" or "Maybe"

You are closer to the truth here.

"It depends...on whether I agree it's okay or not."

Simple question.

The fact is that one cannot deny a white supremacist the right to post threads like that, particularly those members that have made it clear that racially contentious threads should not be secluded.

Get it yet?


God bless.

 

[Darrell C]

Would the one who voted Yes expand on their reasoning for their vote?

There isn't a right or wrong answer to the poll, it is simply a discussion of the issue and both sides have valid points.


God bless.

 

[Darrell C]

Five people have an opinion on this question.

Anyone else?


God bless.

 

[InTheLight]

I voted no. But when casting my vote I only considered threads that would have taken the white supremist viewpoint and not threads that would condemn that viewpoint. Threads that denounced white supremacy would be fine, and I hope that would be the default setting. But you never know...

 

[Revmitchell]

The only reason not to engage this conversation would be fear of exposure.

You need to prove this accusation. I want proof that this is the only option available.

 

[Darrell C]

I voted no. But when casting my vote I only considered threads that would have taken the white supremist viewpoint and not threads that would condemn that viewpoint. Threads that denounced white supremacy would be fine, and I hope that would be the default setting. But you never know...

And you don't see that as a double standard? That it's okay for threads advocating, not denouncing Racial Contention, if it's from a black perspective, but the same message from a white perspective you would censure?


God bless.

 

[Darrell C]

You need to prove this accusation. I want proof that this is the only option available.

Isn't the fact that you refuse to answer...proof enough?

It is for me.

Answer the question and prove me wrong.


God bless.

 

[Darrell C]

And just to refresh your memory, the question is "Are White Supremacy Threads Acceptable?"


God bless.

 

[Revmitchell]

Isn't the fact that you refuse to answer...proof enough?

It is for me.



Answer the question and prove me wrong.


God bless.

Prove that is the only option available? Prove there are no other thought processes and reasoning available that your accusation is the only option out there.

Lack of any evidence from you exposes you and your agenda. Like so many others you are using debate tactics and and have no other agenda. Your behavior and accusations are trollish.

You are now exposed for what you are. May the Lord do a work of repentance in your heart.