Featured To My Friends in the Democratic Party

Ah, come on friend! No need to play the Reverse Ad Hominem Martyr card. There is a difference between challenging your reasoning and “demonizing you”.


Such as the reasoning that you can’t be a positive vote against #NEVERHILLARY while also being committed against the only rational “alternative” in a 2 party race, meaning the elected nominee of the Republican Party. To try to be both, #NEVEHILLARY & #NEVERTRUMP just doesn’t jive in this election – IF you want your vote to truthfully and productively go against one or the other AS A PRIORITY.

So, if you’re not sincere about being #NEVERHILLARY , fine, that is your vote and you have made your choice. Just don’t be trying to yank our chain if #NEVERHILLARY is not your "true" priority.

Sorry, we of the Republican Party only give our full backing to those who are “FULLY” committed to the #NEVERHILLARY movement. No others need apply!

Again, we cannot emphasize enough that we have a lot of respect for the #NEVERHILLARY movement and assure those Democrats who are willing to make the FULL COMMITMENT to this movement that you giving advantage to your opposition is not even a consideration that has crossed our mind.

If being #NEVERTRUMP is your first priority just say so. No need to let your conscience about enabling Hillary make you feel demonized.

 

I was addressing "my Democratic friends" and you said in agreement, "Whatever #NEVERHILLARY".

Up to this point I've merely agreed with you and "your" (#NEVERTRUMP-eteer) reasoning, friend, and you might to consider that perhaps it is "unChristain" or at least ignorant to try make a debate personal rather than address the issues of the argument. - Which again, I've been using the #NEVERTRUMP reasoning not my own.

You seem to have a problem with my reasoning that a true and rationally thinking #NEVERHILLARY movement supporter cannot be double minded and take the worthless position of not taking a productive action against enabling her victory. If you want it both ways, too bad, sorry, it doesn't logically work that way. If you don't like the kind of arguments being used for the #NEVERHILLARY movement maybe you should check the source of them.

 

Whoa, I have been saying I think it is a GREAT IDEA for Democrats to commit to the #NEVERHILLARY movement with the same commitments of the #NEVERTRUMP movement, meaning to go right ahead and vote for a 3rd party. And I will stand by their decision. Once again, I fully support that reasoning for them and with no ulterior motive , you know, like it would give advantage to their opposition (the Republican Party), which according to the #NEVERTRUMP-eteers is not an issue to be considered anyway.


Sheesh, enough of this true this party and true that party stuff! I'm just trying to give the Democrats an example in how to stand up for their #NEVERHILLARY movement on equal terms with the reasoning of the #NEVERTRUMP movement groupies. Totally unbiasedly of course.

 

Ah, my arguments have been taken directly from the reasoning I've been given by the #NEVERTRUMP-eteers right here on this board.

Such as:
...it doesn't give advantage to opposition.
...it is foolish to say otherwise.
...that both are of the same coin so it doesn't make a difference.
...that if Trump wins it is entirely the responsibility of the those who voted for Hillary in the primary. Eh, 318?
etc. etc.,

So if you find these arguments "agitating" I don't know what tell you, but that I'm trying to make as many #NEVERHILLARY friends as I can. You seem to have a problem with my reasoning for them??? I can't imagine why you, a "truly devoted Republican #NEVERtRUMP-eteer", would object to the Democrats committing to #NEVERHILLARY on equal terms.

It's okay if you don't want to be my friend, I won't hold it against you for coming into the "To My Friends in the Democratic Party" thread unawares that I would using my #NEVERTRUMP friend's reasoning for the #NEVERHILLARY position.

 

Well, your reasoning in this thread seem to be generally focused on Ad Hominem/Reverse Ad Hominem arguments and I have been trying to avoid that kind of “debate”, so…

I will, however, address your statement that those are not your arguments, only by taking a look at the first one I presented, as not to waste too much of your time on those pesky non-Ad Hominem arguments. So your argument is NOT that “...it doesn't give advantage to the opposition…if one takes their vote away from their own opposing party” IOWs, ("you've never gave me {nor would you give me} any of those reasons") you do not stand by any of those reasons, and therefore, I can take your word on it that you agree that taking your vote away from your party does give advantage to the opposition?

Hey, I will take you at your word!! And I sincerely want you to know that I can appreciate that kind of logical reasoning! But, shhhhhh, please don’t be giving my Democratic friends any ideas that committing to the #NEVERHILLARY movement could do such a thing!! Thank you.