Featured Local schools serve breakfast and lunch through Summer months!?

No, I presume you use highways.

I presume you eat food. Indeed,

if you do not work nor pay taxes what does that say about you using government benefits?

I do find it ironic that you do not complain about government subsidies that help keep the price of produce low and, thus, benefit you, while you complain bitterly about children in need being helped. How do you justify that stance?

 

Why are taxes being used to subsidize:

1. Corn
2. Wheat
3. Soybeans
4. Rice
5. Beer
6. Milk
7. Beef
8. Peanut Butter
9. Sunflower Oil

http://articles.mercola.com/sites/a...s-the-us-government-is-paying-you-to-eat.aspx


Any product you buy that uses these commodities means you are being aided. I find it amazing that beer is subsidized as well as wheat. A double subsidy there I'd say.

Again, why is it all right for you to receive help, whether you asked for it or not, and it is bad to help kids in need who re hungry?

 

Truth is my question is right on target. Your refusal to answer shows you realize you are in an impossible position to defend.

Simple question, why are you entitled to benefits you want to refuse to children?

 

If you get off of it, that would be lessened to a significant extent.[/QUOTE]
Only if you stop posting.

Sent from my SGH-M919 using Tapatalk

 

Ditto. It's a shame that this would be constant display of selfishness and disregard for the plight of the poor or anyone some feel to be less worthy than them has kinda become what folks expect from "radical right" Christians.

Sent from my SGH-M919 using Tapatalk

 

People complain about the poor receiving benefits and often do nor realize that they are receiving benefits and often those benefits are more expensive than the services to the poor.

From: http://fivethirtyeight.com/datalab/most-americans-get-free-stuff-from-the-government/

But “free stuff” from the government is far more extensive than the benefits disdained by those politicians, and is eagerly accepted by people of every race and income level. As Howard Gleckman, a tax expert who writes for the Tax Policy Center, a joint venture of the Brookings Institution and the Urban Institute, pointed out recently, virtually every American gets some kind of government subsidy, from people who have mortgages or employer-sponsored health care (big tax deductions) to those who work for or invest in big companies (big corporate tax subsidies). Recipients of Social Security and Medicare get back far more in benefits than they paid in taxes.

 

And that is the big problem, more benefits than revenue. Can we go on forever in such a spiral [I know you don't care]? Maybe that's one of those principles you and your wife worked out?

 

Do you favor:

1. Eliminating these programs?
2. Continue funding them, being sure they are fully funded?

 

What programs? This started off about kids getting tax-funded breakfasts, but you insert socialist security, highways, and crop subsidies. Which are you blowing about now?

 

I simply ask a question that was a logical extension of what you say you believe. As it put you in an impossible position to defend without showing your perniciousness you refuse to answer.

So again, I ask, why do you accept benefits from the government that you do not want similar benefits given to poor children? Please answer. Continued whining only shows the weakness of your position.