Featured Philippians 2:6

The problem is that the Greek Grammar and construction makes it very clear that John was stating that Jesus was God, same as the father, but not the father!

 

Also, there would be that pesky "My Lord and my God" saying...

 

I don't disagree. But, tell that to the Jehovah's Witnesses. And, I've tried explaining it to those on that particular blog, mostly to no avail.

 

And they have a response to that, as well.

 

None though that address the biblical Greek text!

 

The problem is that there are NO reputable greek scholars that would agree with them that John called jesus a god, and not God!

 

I don't disagree with you, per se; but, can you tell me how would defend it?

 

Ask them if they believe in Isaiah, as he stated that God knows of no other Saviour, and yet NT calls Jesus saviour....

 

I mean from the Greek grammar.

 

Hit them with the Granville sharp rule, as to when peter called Jesus our great God and our Saviour!

 

I thought you might invoke that. Unfortunately, it doesn't apply to John 20:28. The article is used before both nouns (it's article-noun-(pronoun)-kai-article-noun), which, if we used Sharp, would indicate two separate entities. Again, I don't disagree with you on the Christological significance of this passage; but, their comeback was that this passage is: "My Lord" (Jesus) and "My God" (the Father).

 

I had something similar happen to me, though, at the time, I was less prepared. They told me they would talk with some others at their church and get back with me. I didn't see them again.

 

When paul called jesus the Lord, was he not invoking the LORD as in the OT then, and not just a title for say a ruler/king?

 

I have talked with scores of JW's and have only had one leave the assembly (actually, he was disassociated or some such thing).

HankD

 

With all due respect, I'm in general agreement with you, but my intent is to exegete and argue from the Greek. Their counter to your position would be that John doesn't necessarily rely on Paul. This is why we have to argue from the Greek of the particular context. Otherwise, it becomes an endless battle of words back and forth. Unfortunately, John 20:28 is not a slam dunk for the position of Jesus as Deity. Again, to reiterate: I don't disagree, and I'm a Trinitarian.

 

the JW loved to quote professor Mantey, as one who supports them stating jesus was a god, but he wrote a really critical review on them and their Watchtower version, and did NOT agree with them on jesus at all!

 

They view on him is that he is the angel Michael , correct?

 

The blog I referenced is not JWs. Participants adhere to some form of Hebrew Roots, agreeing that Yeshua/Jesus is the Messiah, yet denying His Deity. Not all deny it, but most do.

 

2 Hebrew passages to address with them are theones where God was meeting Abrham here on Earth, and yet there was the God in heaven raing still, so God was existing both here a s a man, and still in Heaven at same time! Also, the Angel of the Lord seemed to speak for and have the very same rights as yahweh Himself!