Man and Men in Various Translations

[reformed_baptist]

I have been rather clear. I don't know why you are confused.

The TNIV was treated like an abused step-child with all kinds of unfounded lies thrown at the translation team.
For the 2011 NIV the opposition lost a lot of steam. They sputtered, but lost their mojo.

Now with the modified HCSB called the CSB, the opposition has to eat crow. When the CSB in some cases uses more inclusive language than the NIV they will have to do a lot of backtracking.

The hypocrisy is galling. So I have just come out with the numbers --facts in numerical form.

Ok, I get it now - the people critical of the TNIV are supporting the CSB which falls at the same hurdle - thanks for clarifying

 

[Martin Marprelate]

I wanted to see how various English translations compared with one another with two key words.
First the number of times man was used in Romans, 1 Cor., 2 Cor. and Gal. Now sometimes the word
many came up,

Thanks for this analysis, Rippon. I have found it most helpful.
It has confirmed me in my preference for the NKJV.

 

[Rippon]

Thanks for this analysis, Rippon. I have found it most helpful.
It has confirmed me in my preference for the NKJV.

Yeah, let's hear it for old-fashioned translations that use antiquated phraseology.