1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

My Theological Stance after Searching with All of My Heart

Discussion in 'Calvinism & Arminianism Debate' started by Steven Yeadon, Aug 28, 2017.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Steven Yeadon

    Steven Yeadon Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2017
    Messages:
    2,391
    Likes Received:
    315
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I am sorry then, I retract my claim that Calvin ruled as a tyrant in Geneva.

    -EDIT-

    My history professors were wrong then.
     
  2. Van

    Van Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2011
    Messages:
    28,745
    Likes Received:
    1,136
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I edited my post some more after you posted.
     
  3. Yeshua1

    Yeshua1 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2012
    Messages:
    52,624
    Likes Received:
    2,742
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Both Calvin and Luther had the big mistake problem of trying to get the RCC to reform internally, but they should have took the truth God revealed to them and made a clean break with Rome, as they , especially calvin, rediscovered true biblical salvation, but they did not reform far enough, as basically kept still a lot of the RCC views on sacraments and E scatology for example.
     
  4. Yeshua1

    Yeshua1 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2012
    Messages:
    52,624
    Likes Received:
    2,742
    Faith:
    Baptist
    You were mistaken, but you did not knowingly lie!
     
  5. JonC

    JonC Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2001
    Messages:
    35,198
    Likes Received:
    3,791
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Yes. Your history professor (s) should have been aware of the Grand Councel of Geneva and the extent of Calvin's authority and influence.
     
  6. TCassidy

    TCassidy Late-Administator Emeritus
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2005
    Messages:
    20,080
    Likes Received:
    3,491
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Agreed. John Calvin not only was not a member of the City Council, he was not even a citizen (he was and remained a French citizen until his death in 1564). After fleeing persecution in France, in 1536 he moved first to Basel then on to Geneva. But after only 18 months, he was banished from the city for disagreeing with the city council. That was in 1538.

    Calvin went to Strasbourg, where he pastored for three years and also married Idellete de Bure, the widow of an Anabaptist, and raised her two children as his own.

    He returned to Geneva in 1541 and was appointed by the city council as pastor of the Protestant church (labeled as "Lutheran" as many dissenting churches were labeled at that time) in Geneva.

    When Michael Servetus said he would go to Geneva, which had become a center of Protestantism in Europe, Calvin wrote him and tried to persuade him to stay away as coming to Geneva would be dangerous for him due to his heterodox views on the Trinity. He ignored Calvin's warning and came, and preached his heresy, anyway. Calvin did denounce his false teaching, but it was the city council that ordered him arrested, tried him, and condemned him to death. Calvin had nothing to do with it. In fact Calvin tried to intervene on Servetus's behalf, first pleading for mercy then, when that failed, asked that he be hanged rather than burned at the stake. Hanging being much quicker and relatively painless when compared to being burned at the stake.
     
  7. TCassidy

    TCassidy Late-Administator Emeritus
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2005
    Messages:
    20,080
    Likes Received:
    3,491
    Faith:
    Baptist
    What a critical study of history will show is that John Calvin did attempt to establish a "Theocracy" in Geneva, much to the chagrin of the city council.

    Calvin believed there were four officers who should control both the church and the city. Those four offices were:

    Pastors conducted the services, preached, administered the ordinances, and cared for the welfare of parishioners.

    The teachers lectured in Latin on the Old and New Testaments. The audience consisted mainly of the older schoolboys and ministers, but anyone could attend.

    Elders kept an eye on spiritual affairs of the general population.

    Social welfare was the job of the deacons. They governed the local hospital, made sure the poor and widows were fed, and supervised the alms-house which cared for the indigent. The deacons were so effective, Geneva had no beggars.
     
  8. JonC

    JonC Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2001
    Messages:
    35,198
    Likes Received:
    3,791
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Ironically Ami Perrin (an opponent of John Calvin) sentenced Servetus to death. Maybe he knew in the future Calvin would catch the blame. :)

    I have read that Calvin's opposition to the council's method of execution was motivated more by politics than by mercy (that burning pointed to a matter of religion while hanging or beheading pointed to a matter of state). But I don't know this to be fact.
     
  9. Yeshua1

    Yeshua1 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2012
    Messages:
    52,624
    Likes Received:
    2,742
    Faith:
    Baptist
    NONE of those facts get mentioned in many church history texts!
     
  10. TCassidy

    TCassidy Late-Administator Emeritus
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2005
    Messages:
    20,080
    Likes Received:
    3,491
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I have heard that too, usually from those who would attack Calvin on any subject be it true or not. But I have never found any evidence to support the claim. But Calvin stated in his letter to William Farel, "I desired that the severity of the punishment be mitigated." (Letters of John Calvin, Carlisle, Penn: Banner of Truth Trust, 1980, page159. ISBN 0-85151-323-9)
     
    • Like Like x 1
  11. Steven Yeadon

    Steven Yeadon Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2017
    Messages:
    2,391
    Likes Received:
    315
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Ah, thank all of you very much for setting me straight. In doing my own research I am finding that my disagreement with Calvin is much more like my disagreement with Luther. The two men are very similar, which is what I was taught in seminary. Calvin is thoroughly Reformed though compared to Luther.
     
  12. Rippon

    Rippon Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2005
    Messages:
    19,715
    Likes Received:
    585
    Faith:
    Baptist
    That's Whitefield, even though it's pronounced as you spelled it. He was aptly named.
     
  13. Rippon

    Rippon Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2005
    Messages:
    19,715
    Likes Received:
    585
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I am sorry for saying you lied. If what JonC said is a correct distinction between telling falsehoods and lying --then you told falsehoods. But please be careful when making severe charges against someone unless you check it out first.
    You seem to be a teachable guy, and for that I am thankful.

    How long has it been since you had those classes?

    Of course we tend to respect our teachers, but if some decent amount of time has gone by we should be able to re-evaluate what we have been taught. We need to check things out for ourselves.

    Over the years here on the BB there have been a number of posters who have said wickedly false things about Calvin.
    I got trigger-happy to nip it in the bud.

    Thank you for your submissive spirit Steven.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  14. Rippon

    Rippon Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2005
    Messages:
    19,715
    Likes Received:
    585
    Faith:
    Baptist
    The two men were as different as day and night. Luther was like a bull in a China shop. Calvin was much more mild --not a natural fighter as Luther was. But God raised up Luther to go back to the Bible. Calvin was more reserved --a thinker and organizer. And the latter was more pastoral than Luther.

    Luther could be like a volcano at times -like his treatment of Zwingli. If nine points could be agreed upon one point of difference tee him off. Calvin believed if he could spend two hours with someone face to face he would be able to persuade them to agree with him. His interactions with Bullinger, for instance.

    Calvin admired Luther very much and said he would still love him even if he was called a devil. Now that's saying something.
     
  15. Rippon

    Rippon Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2005
    Messages:
    19,715
    Likes Received:
    585
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Calvin became a citizen in Geneva in 1559.
    That was two years earlier in 1534.
    Actually Calvin was a witness for the prosecution.
    It was not hanging, but beheading.
     
    #95 Rippon, Sep 1, 2017
    Last edited: Sep 1, 2017
  16. Rippon

    Rippon Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2005
    Messages:
    19,715
    Likes Received:
    585
    Faith:
    Baptist
    On the contrary, most do mention actual historical facts.
     
  17. TCassidy

    TCassidy Late-Administator Emeritus
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2005
    Messages:
    20,080
    Likes Received:
    3,491
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Servetus was burned in 1553.

    Nope. He stayed only a few months in Basel and arrived in Geneva the same year, 1536.

    Nope. He never appeared before the council.

    The civil penalty for citizens was hanging or beheading. Burning at the stake was reserved for crimes against the church.
     
  18. Martin Marprelate

    Martin Marprelate Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2010
    Messages:
    8,917
    Likes Received:
    2,133
    Faith:
    Baptist
    If you have listened to Van, I'm afraid you do not understand John 6:39-40 at all. He has a theological system that is utterly crazy, but which he is determined to try and push upon the unwary on this board.
    There is nothing vague about God the Father giving the Son a people to redeem. It is repeated in John 10:29 and John 17:2, 6. Outside of John's Gospel, the clearest place to see this teaching is probably Ephesians 1:3-14. Here the work in salvation of Father Son and Holy Spirit is explained. In verses 3-6, it is the Father who has chosen His people in eternity past and predestined them to be adopted as sons, 'to the praise of His glorious grace.' In verses 6-12, it is the work of the Son who has redeemed these same people by the shedding of His blood, 'to the praise of His glory.' In verses 13-14, the Holy Spirit seals those same people to the day of redemption-- the Spirit Himself being the seal guaranteeing the redemption of 'those who are God's possession-- to the praise of His glory.'

    What astonishing mercy and power:
    In accord with his pleasure and will
    He created each planet, each flower,
    Every galaxy, microbe, and hill.
    He suspended the planet in space
    To the praise of his glorious grace.


    With despicable self-love and rage,
    We rebelled and fell under the curse.
    Yet God did not rip out the page
    And destroy all who love the perverse.
    No, he chose us to make a new race,
    To the praise of his glorious grace.


    Providentially ruling all things
    To conform to the end he designed,
    He mysteriously governs, and brings
    His eternal wise plans into time.
    He works out every step, every trace,
    To the praise of his glorious grace.


    Long before the creation began,
    He foreknew those he’d ransom in Christ;
    Long before time’s cold hour-glass ran,
    He ordained the supreme sacrifice.
    In the cross he removed our disgrace,
    To the praise of his glorious grace.


    We were blessed in the heavenly realms
    Long before being included in Christ.
    Since we heard the good news, overwhelmed,
    We reach forward to seize Paradise.
    We shall see him ourselves, face to face,
    To the praise of his glorious grace.


    Don Carson
     
  19. Rippon

    Rippon Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2005
    Messages:
    19,715
    Likes Received:
    585
    Faith:
    Baptist
    What has that to do with what I said?

    You stated that Calvin was not a citizen of Geneva until his death in 1564.

    I simply told you that he became a citizen of Geneva in 1559.
    You claimed he fled France in 1536. I said no, it was two years earlier in 1534. Allow me to be even more specific --it was mid-October during the Placard Affair.
    I had told you that Calvin was a witness for the prosecution of Servetus. It's an historical fact.
    You claimed that Calvin pled for the hanging of Servetus. I told you that you were mistaken. Calvin pleaded for a more merciful beheading --not hanging.
     
  20. TCassidy

    TCassidy Late-Administator Emeritus
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2005
    Messages:
    20,080
    Likes Received:
    3,491
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Everything.

    No, I didn't. Go back and read what I really said rather than what you wish I had said.

    I know that. It is irrelevant to this discussion.

    Nope. He never appeared before the council. His letters condemning Servetus were entered but he never testified.

    He begged for mercy and a less painful execution. His pleas were ignored.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Loading...