How do you know? You know nothing about me. You are deceiving yourself if you believe you are following sola scriptura, because you reject the clear and obvious meaning of those very Scriptures when taken together and all you have are insults and a pile of false pride.
When I gave you a detailed analysis of the relevant texts you ignored it and wasted the thread on a pile of irrelevant nonsense. The evidence for Penal Substitution is absolutely clear, not from one 'killer' text, but from the whole of Scripture.
Martin,
Throughout the threads, much Scripture has been discussed.
Your “detailed analysis” and “relevant texts” were systematically refuted.
Now attempting to pin the rejection of penal substitution as disregard of Scripture is just inconsistent with the work of these threads.
I am too, like JonC, am confronted with the truth of Scripture not fitting with preconceived and long taught views.
This is not the only issue that needs modification or even discarding.
All one can seek is to lay before the B.B. that which is held and the rationale with a Scripture support. If such is worthy, then perchance others may benefit.
It is not unreasonable to find great push back when something such as PST is discarded, yet there is hope that at least some awareness of another view is seen.
But if folks truly held to sola Scripture, they would all agree that not a single Scripture appoints God as pouring out wrath upon the Son.