1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Featured Retribultion Theology

Discussion in 'Baptist Theology & Bible Study' started by agedman, Nov 21, 2017.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Top Posters
Page 6 of 8
  1. JonC

    JonC Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2001
    Messages:
    35,198
    Likes Received:
    3,791
    Faith:
    Baptist
    You are mistaken. As Aquinas (who clarified very strongly he was not claiming God punished Christ in our place for sin) insisted Christ was punished for our sin (what you find enough to be PSA). No one is denying Christ died to save us.
     
    #101 JonC, Nov 24, 2017
  2. Yeshua1

    Yeshua1 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2012
    Messages:
    52,624
    Likes Received:
    2,742
    Faith:
    Baptist
    No, I am in the same boat with Calvin/Berkhof/Hodgh/Erickson/Grudem, basicall most of the reformed and th calvinistic Baptists!
     
    #102 Yeshua1, Nov 25, 2017
  3. Yeshua1

    Yeshua1 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2012
    Messages:
    52,624
    Likes Received:
    2,742
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Since jesus Himself became our sin bearer in our stead, and since lost sinners whe judged by God as sinners experience His divine wrath, why wouldn't jesus?
     
    #103 Yeshua1, Nov 25, 2017
  4. JonC

    JonC Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2001
    Messages:
    35,198
    Likes Received:
    3,791
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Because Scripture states that doing so is against God's nature.
     
    #104 JonC, Nov 25, 2017
  5. Yeshua1

    Yeshua1 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2012
    Messages:
    52,624
    Likes Received:
    2,742
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Against His nature to have divine wrath and punishment of sin?
     
    #105 Yeshua1, Nov 25, 2017
  6. JonC

    JonC Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2001
    Messages:
    35,198
    Likes Received:
    3,791
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Against His nature to condemn the righteous. You have misunderstood the atonement because you you have adopted a theory that not only goes beyond what is said in Scripture but denies it.

    The faithfulness and love Jesus experienced on the Cross is the faithfulness and love we can expect from a holy and immutable God.
     
    #106 JonC, Nov 25, 2017
  7. Yeshua1

    Yeshua1 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2012
    Messages:
    52,624
    Likes Received:
    2,742
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Except that while upon the Cross, he was the sin bearer, and as such, would be shown how God treats lost sinners...
     
    #107 Yeshua1, Nov 25, 2017
  8. JonC

    JonC Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2001
    Messages:
    35,198
    Likes Received:
    3,791
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Do you understand what "immutable" means? It means no except.
     
    #108 JonC, Nov 25, 2017
  9. Martin Marprelate

    Martin Marprelate Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2010
    Messages:
    8,909
    Likes Received:
    2,128
    Faith:
    Baptist
    No it doesn't. It means 'unchangeable.'
     
    #109 Martin Marprelate, Nov 28, 2017
  10. JonC

    JonC Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2001
    Messages:
    35,198
    Likes Received:
    3,791
    Faith:
    Baptist
    In the context of theology, it means that God does not change, no exceptions. He is faithful and it is upon His faithfulness that centuries upon centuries of God's people have relied. God does not change. He is faithful to His word. If He says that He will not condemn the righteous then He will not condemn the righteous. If He says He will judge the wicked then He will judge the wicked. The solution is not God deciding upon which promise to break but making the wicked righteous. If God's nature changes once then He is not immutable. If God breaks His Word once, then He is not faithful. It means "no except". God is a faithful to His Word. No exceptions.

    You are caught up in a system that is foreign to Scripture but that you superimpose upon it and through that lens you interpret the Cross. This does not mean that you hold to "another gospel", but it does mean that you are not seeing clearly the true gospel upon which you cling. If this is the only way that you can see the gospel of Christ, as it was for me at one time, then that is fine. I would, however, encourage you to at least try to read Scripture apart from the theory you are imposing upon it. Even if you reject the idea, just try it every now and then. You will be surprised, I promise, how much more comes to light when you allow Scripture to simply interpret itself.
     
    #110 JonC, Nov 28, 2017
  11. agedman

    agedman Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2011
    Messages:
    11,023
    Likes Received:
    1,108
    Faith:
    Baptist
    When consideration of terms such as immutable, one is confronted with a certain level of dilemma.

    There are those who would perceive God as flexible and adapting.

    There are those who would view God as rigid, inflexible.

    The word immutable, does certainly carry as synonyms such as rigid, inflexible, unchageable, set, fixed ..., however immutable is not completely synonymous (imo) with the limit of these types of characterizations.

    Rather, immutable has the background of not being able to be mutated. Biologically or chemically altered.

    As it relates to God and focusing upon His character, it is that His character is consistent, His purpose unthwarted, His holiness unspoiled...

    As it relates to humankind, immutable means that God's vows do not change, His statements have full veracity, that complete trust and reliance are securely held because He doesn't even have the flitting thought of modification or mutating into that which would violate Himself.

    Unlike humankind, who can be "double minded" confused, perplexed, ... God cannot.

    However, does God actually change in how He presents Himself to His creation?

    To some, they would suggest He does "appear" to change as more is revealed in Scriptures about His character and purpose. Adam may have not seen these as changes at all, for no other has walked and talked as Adam and God. But human perspective is always marred by the influences and pressures of the human condition.

    So, is God immutable?

    Perhaps. Did not Christ change from the glory He had with the Father to take upon Himself the form of man? Was this not a forever condition that literally changed God?

    Did God actually go through a biological mutation?
     
    #111 agedman, Nov 28, 2017
    • Agree Agree x 1
  12. JonC

    JonC Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2001
    Messages:
    35,198
    Likes Received:
    3,791
    Faith:
    Baptist
    There is a sense whereby immutability of nature (and charter) demands mutability in terms of relationship. God's attitude towards the unrepentant sinner changes upon repentance. And of course, biologically God became man. I believe we can go too far and present a stagnant God entrapped by Himself and unable to truly interact with mankind. But we can also go too far the other way and present God as unfaithful to His own nature and His own Word.

    When I say immutable I am referring to nature. God is faithful, unchangeable. Not driven by circumstance but also not unable to engage with and within Creation.
     
    #112 JonC, Nov 28, 2017
    • Agree Agree x 1
  13. Martin Marprelate

    Martin Marprelate Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2010
    Messages:
    8,909
    Likes Received:
    2,128
    Faith:
    Baptist
    No. God's treatment of the Lord Jesus on the cross until the ninth hour was what we expect a holy and immutable God to inflict upon sinners. 'For Christ suffered once for sins, the just for the unjust, that He might bring us to God.'
    Exactly so. God will not condemn the righteous nor justify the wicked. That is why Christ was 'made....... sin for us that we might become the righteousness of God in Him.' Wonderful, isn't it?
    No. I understand that since you are running short of arguments you might wish to make baseless accusations against me, whom you have never met and about whom you know nothing-- it is easier to play the man instead of the ball. But I have just resisted the almost overpowering temptation to respond in kind.
     
    #113 Martin Marprelate, Nov 28, 2017
  14. JonC

    JonC Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2001
    Messages:
    35,198
    Likes Received:
    3,791
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Jesus IS Holy Immutable God.

    I have no baseless accusations for you, brother. I know your position and held it for decades. I am saying that your arguments are flawed because you assume the same context I once assumed. I don't think you see this. And that is OK. Better the gospel and tradition than no gospel at all.
     
    #114 JonC, Nov 28, 2017
  15. Martin Marprelate

    Martin Marprelate Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2010
    Messages:
    8,909
    Likes Received:
    2,128
    Faith:
    Baptist
    What?? You mean Hebrews 13:8 is in the Bible? It didn't stop Him from becoming man though, did it?
    I have had Jehovah's Witnesses be just as condescending and holier-than-thou to me as they told me how they used to follow 'religious tradition' but now they are thinking for themselves
     
    #115 Martin Marprelate, Nov 28, 2017
    • Funny Funny x 1
  16. JonC

    JonC Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2001
    Messages:
    35,198
    Likes Received:
    3,791
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Yes, the Word became flesh (a change) but NEVER ceased being God (immutable).

    I don't care about your experiences with the JW's any more than you care that your response to my urging you to Scripture apart from your tradition reminds me of conversations with my RCC friends. Why even go there? I'm not JW and you are not Catholic.
     
    #116 JonC, Nov 28, 2017
  17. agedman

    agedman Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2011
    Messages:
    11,023
    Likes Received:
    1,108
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Oh, but Christ was "made sin for us," however, that does not mean he sinned.

    Christ did not loose His righteousness. He did not conform to the world, and none of the world is found in Him as it relates to the lusts and pride.

    Christ suffered once FOR sins, He remained JUST that He might bring us to God.

    What some desire is that God "punished" the Son as if the Son was no longer His Son, or had become some sinful creation.

    That just isn't the Scripture presentation.

    Christ never became unjust.
    Christ never became sin.

    If He had, there would be no release from injustice, and no resolve to sin.

    Can one so bound release one bound? Do blind lead blind?

    Christ can not be considered sinful at anytime, or He was not the true Lamb of God taking away the sin. He carried our sin, He bore our sin, He did not become sinful.
     
    #117 agedman, Nov 28, 2017
  18. Martin Marprelate

    Martin Marprelate Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2010
    Messages:
    8,909
    Likes Received:
    2,128
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Really? Wow! And that is supposed to challenge my argument how exactly?
    Because you seem to think that because you have had a change of mind it must automatically be a change for the better.
    I beg to differ.
     
    #118 Martin Marprelate, Nov 28, 2017
  19. Martin Marprelate

    Martin Marprelate Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2010
    Messages:
    8,909
    Likes Received:
    2,128
    Faith:
    Baptist
    'God cannot look where there is sin with any pleasure, and though as far as Jesus is personally concerned, he is the Father's beloved Son in whom he is well pleased; yet when he saw sin laid upon his Son, he made that Son cry, "My God! My God! Why hast thou forsaken me?" It was not possible that Jesus should enjoy the light of his Father's presence while he was made sin for us; consequently he went through a horror of great darkness, the root and source of which was the withdrawing of his Father's presence. More than that, not only was light withdrawn, but positive sorrow was inflicted. God must punish sin, and though the sin was not Christ's by his actually doing it, yet it was laid upon him, and therefore he was made a curse for us.....God only knows the griefs to which the Son of God was put when the Lord made to meet upon him the imiquity of us all. To crown all there came death itself. Death is the punishment for sin, and whatever it may mean....in the sentence "In the day thou eatest of it thou shalt surely die," Christ felt.'
    C.H. Spurgeon. MTP, Vol. 12.
     
    #119 Martin Marprelate, Nov 28, 2017
  20. JonC

    JonC Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2001
    Messages:
    35,198
    Likes Received:
    3,791
    Faith:
    Baptist
    This is contrary to Scripture. Scripture teaches that God does not condemn the righteous but is instead a faithful God. Second, Jesus is not a demi-god to whom God's nature does not apply.

    I don't think you realize the full implications of your theory.
     
    #120 JonC, Nov 28, 2017
Page 6 of 8
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Loading...