agedman,
The death on the cross was clearly a Covenant arraingement.
Jesus was not a suicide ....
23 Him, being delivered by the determinate counsel and foreknowledge of God, ye have taken, and by wicked hands have crucified and slain:
[QUOTE]it was not taken from Him by the events,[/QUOTE]
it was......".ye have taken, and by wicked hands have crucified and slain:"
He accomplished the Covenant death, and Redemption on behalf of the elect the Father had given to Him.
It was actual...not potential....it was for the elect alone.
No...the twelve stones on the breastplate of the High Priest represented who he interceded for.
17 These words spake Jesus, and lifted up his eyes to heaven, and said, Father, the hour is come; glorify thy Son, that thy Son also may glorify thee:
2 As thou hast given him power over all flesh, that he should give eternal life to as many as thou hast given him.
3 And this is life eternal, that they might know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom thou hast sent.
You repeat this, but divorced from the Covenant promise it does not mean what the terms of the Covenant demand.....all the promises.
Everyone limits the atonement....everybody except reprobate universalists.
20 Saying, This is the blood of the testament which God hath enjoined unto you.
21 Moreover he sprinkled with blood both the tabernacle, and all the vessels of the ministry.
22 And almost all things are by the law purged with blood; and without shedding of blood is no remission.
Blood was shed for all who will believe before the White Throne judgment...not for unbelievers.....they do not want the blood, or the Mediator...they perish in their sins...plural
I do not agree at all....the only reason any believe is the Covenant....without which no one would ever believe.,
I knew you wouldWell, I came back and had to remove the agreement.
Many do not agree with you . The Covenant making and Covenant keeping God has indeed dealt with the sheep by Covenant.The blood shed on the cross was not a "covenant death"
The death on the cross was clearly a Covenant arraingement.
not sure what you are thinking about with this...for the lack of blood did not cause the death.
Christ caused his own death,
Jesus was not a suicide ....
23 Him, being delivered by the determinate counsel and foreknowledge of God, ye have taken, and by wicked hands have crucified and slain:
Yes He didhe gave His life,
[QUOTE]it was not taken from Him by the events,[/QUOTE]
it was......".ye have taken, and by wicked hands have crucified and slain:"
It was not the amount of blood.....it was what it accomplished.nor the suffering, nor the lack of blood (which on the cross was little compared to other places).
He accomplished the Covenant death, and Redemption on behalf of the elect the Father had given to Him.
It was actual...not potential....it was for the elect alone.
The blood sprinkled upon the OT covering was for all the people in the land irregardless of whether they were jews or not, or whether they even considered the yearly sacrifice important.
No...the twelve stones on the breastplate of the High Priest represented who he interceded for.
No...Jesus bought the rights to all men, but the design was never to save all.By type, the blood was shed for all creation (John 3) without regard.
17 These words spake Jesus, and lifted up his eyes to heaven, and said, Father, the hour is come; glorify thy Son, that thy Son also may glorify thee:
2 As thou hast given him power over all flesh, that he should give eternal life to as many as thou hast given him.
3 And this is life eternal, that they might know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom thou hast sent.
Apart from the Covenant between the Father and the Son it would not help us.However, the death is a completely other matter. For it is by His death and resurrection that the believer sees the repeated message in the NT.
The emphasis of the redeemed is not just the blood - that importance is not diminished.
The emphasis of the redeemed is upon the death and resurrection - that is what the writers emphasized.
You repeat this, but divorced from the Covenant promise it does not mean what the terms of the Covenant demand.....all the promises.
Now, I realize that some of the reformed still cling to the limit of blood as the limit of atonement.
Everyone limits the atonement....everybody except reprobate universalists.
Blood sacrifice is all through the bible:But just as back in the most ancient OT, it was not the lack of blood, but the lack of belief that separated the eternal estate.
20 Saying, This is the blood of the testament which God hath enjoined unto you.
21 Moreover he sprinkled with blood both the tabernacle, and all the vessels of the ministry.
22 And almost all things are by the law purged with blood; and without shedding of blood is no remission.
Blood was shed for all, but not all believe.
Blood was shed for all who will believe before the White Throne judgment...not for unbelievers.....they do not want the blood, or the Mediator...they perish in their sins...plural
That is evidenced in how John 3:16+ flows. The emphasis is not the blood but belief.
I do not agree at all....the only reason any believe is the Covenant....without which no one would ever believe.,