Featured Apostates and Heretics behind the texts underlying modern translations

Most of your modern translations such as the NASB, NIV and others are based on the United Bible Societies Greek text or the Nestle Aland text, I dont trust the editors of these texts such as Bruce Metzger, Kurt and Barbara Aland, or Eberhard Nestle to decide what the accurate and best readings are of the New Testament considering that they are heretics and apostates. For example Metzger questions that Peter even wrote the epistles that bear his Name

“KURT ALAND denied the verbal inspiration of the Bible and wanted to see all denominations united into one “body” by the acceptance of a new ecumenical canon of Scripture which would take into account the Catholic apocryphal books (The Problem of the New Testament Canon, pp. 6,7,30-33). “

Kurt Aland also doubted the canonicity of several New Testament Books.

Not the kind of guy I want editing the Greek text behind my bible translation.

See page 5 and following of this link http://www.bibelgriechisch.info/Aland.pdf
Eberhard Nestle (1851-1913)

“Nestle, of the popular Nestle-Aland Greek New Testament (nearly 30 different editions now), rejected the infallibility of the Bible, and believed it was no more than a normal piece of literature. He claimed that authors of the New Testament never expected their writings to be read by others let alone be taken as the authoritative word of God.”

Kurt and Barbara Aland

“Partner with Eberhard Nestle (above), he and his wife are also contributors the UBS. Aland does not believe in verbal inspiration of the Bible, and that the Old Testament and the gospels are full of myths that were not inspired by God but merely a naturalistic process. Kurt Aland does not believe that the canon of Scripture is complete or settled.”

The Heretics Behind Modern Bible Versions Supported By James White


The people behind modern textual criticism are largely apostate heretics and the evangelicals involved are piggy backing off of unbelieving scholarship.

Textual Criticism Drawn From the Wells of Infidelity

 

What percentage of the word of God is important? Is the differences even if they are 5% not important? Are you trying to tell me that 5% or the word of God is not important?

 

Are there important differences between the Textus Receptus and the Nestle Aland/United Bible Society text? - King James Version Today

 

Psa 33:11 The counsel of the LORD standeth for ever, the thoughts of his heart to all generations.

So then Yeshua, you would contend that only most of the thoughts of God to us will stand for all generations and your position is that we can be content to believe God has not preserved a small percentage of his words?

 

I’m sorry but I fail to see the relevance of your post to the OP?

 

Please show examples of how I have slandered any of the men above.

Which one did I slander and what did I say about them that is slander?

 

Slander: to make false and damaging statements about (someone).

What statement did I make that is false?
Do you not consider it to be apostasy and heresy to do things like questioning the canon of scripture, believing that genesis is not literal, questioning that peter wrote the epistles that bear his name, or claiming that the Old Testament is full of myth?

 

David Cloud is most certainly more of a bigger scholar than you Rippon.

David Cloud has written a encyclopedia for Christianity, a Bible dictionary, has written commentaries on several books of the Bible, has written hundreds upon hundreds of weekly and daily articles on different issues relating to Christianity, has written and published several books on several different issues relating to Christianity, in his book “for love of the Bible”, Cloud makes mention in the preface that he had hundreds of books of the history of the Bible and textual criticism that he consulted when writing that book.

For you to say he’s not a bible scholar is folly and is a blatant slander. He is one of the most studied men alive in Christianity today, as for your charge he is a heretic, I don’t agree with everything David Cloud says, but I would consider him far more sound in the faith than most people on the BB here.

 

Apples and oranges in my opinion.

Your talking about moral failures vs blatant heresies and apostasy in regard to bibliology

That would be like trusting Richard Dawkins on the existence of God.