Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
The material presented is about not venerating Mary.Blah, blah, blah. We don't venerate Mary. Jesus is her Lord and Savior as much as that of anyone, but from henceforth all generations shall call me blessed.
In what ways is she blessed?
Whoa. You're giving as much credit to Mary as does Rome.The material presented is about not venerating Mary.
Mary was blessed for having believed the word of God (Luke 1:30-33,37), and through faith [casting out fear and doubt; Luke 1:30], acting upon it (Luke 1:38-39, etc) in obedience to the will of God (Psalms 40:8), comes the blessing and miracle.
Thank you for the compliment brother HankD. I understand, having been Roman Catholic for many years.One Baptism - As a former Catholic I sympathize and I commend you for your extensive research.
You must know of course that the Church of Rome when she speaks officially she claims to be equal to the Scripture in that she alone maintains the apostolic authority of infallible teaching.
The magisterium of the Catholic Church is the church's authority or office to establish teachings.
That authority is vested uniquely in the Pope with his ex cathedra dogma under the premise that they are in communion with the correct and true teachings of the faith.
There are 4 Marian dogma (teachings concerning Mary the mother of Jesus)
https://www.catholicnewsagency.com/resources/mary/general-information/the-four-marian-dogmas
And a fifth yet to be elevated by the papacy but supported by many in authority and the common folk.
https://www.catholicity.com/churchteaching/fifth-dogma.html
You must be Catholic yourself and not Baptist. You ought to change your identification, as it is a falsehood to pretend otherwise and is therefore transgression of the 9th Commandment.Whoa. You're giving as much credit to Mary as does Rome.
Isn't she blessed for being chosen to usher in the savior of the world, for being chosen to be the mother of her Lord? For being chosen to fulfill a principal role in God's plan of Redemption? For being the woman to whom Christ was commanded to submit and obey growing up? Where is the Gospel preached that the story of Mary is not told?
Of course it does. You are deluded and prove what you want by your apriori.Q: Who was Jesus
A: God
Q: Who was Jesus' mother?
A: Mary
Seems pretty simple to me.
He has a chance to hear the Everlasting Gospel like everyone else and so "come out of her my people", but if he refuses, he will uphold his oaths to Rome over that of the Constitution of the united States, and its proper Amendments, as every other Roman Catholic 'justice'.So watch’s think about Brett Kavanaugh... born and raised Irish Catholic... Jesuit trained.
Before you get anything started learn who started Theotokos the Word and further before the RCC the Ancient Way taught this.Theotokos? or TheoNOTokos! - Sedi Sapientiae? or Sedi SERPENTiae! - Roman Raiders of the Ark
Roman Catholicism's theology teaches that the Roman Catholic "Mary' is "theotokos", the "Sedi Sapientiae" and the "new Ark" of the New Testament:
![]()
http://oi61.tinypic.com/t63xfq.jpg
http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=t63xfq&s=8
![]()
https://web.archive.org/web/2015071...ercy.org/resources/headers/default-header.jpg
Actual Size:
![]()
http://bp0.blogger.com/_YxeBwzO25J8/...onstrance2.jpg
More:
![]()
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_PdZZ5Ifdns...monstrance.jpg
![]()
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_YxeBwzO25J...onstrance1.jpg
![]()
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2765/...1fc299a0_o.jpg
Let's begin with Mary and this Roman Catholic idea of 'theotokos' and compare it to scripture:
"Mother of Jesus", or a 'theotokos'???
Let us take a look at the scriptural (KJB) “Mary” [Matthew 1:16,18,20, 2:11, 13:55; Mark 6:3; Luke 1:27,30,34,38,39,41,46,56, 2:5,16,19,34; Acts 1:14], “the mother of Jesus” [John 2:1,3; Acts 1:14; see also “his mother” - Matthew 1:18, 2:11; Luke 2:34,43; John 19:25; and “mother” - also John 6:42] who was “espoused to Joseph”.
We are going to look at the scriptures in what they themselves have to say about her and what they do not say about her, for there is at this time a persistent theology which pervades much of the Christian world which claims to have support [from the Bible] for an idea that has been defined and termed as: “theotokos” [literally “God-Bearer”, or “one who gives birth to God” and/or also loosely given as “Mother of God”; being a “title”].
Let us look very closely at the scriptures to see if this “title” is accurate or is instead dangerous.
The first question that should be asked is this, “Is the “title” “theotokos” ever itself given anywhere at all in any of the Scriptures by anyone?” Search as we will, the answer comes back to us as a plain, “No.” Though not convincing in and of itself, let us remember this “silence” and come back to this point later.
The next question that should be asked is this, “Is Mary ever called by the appellation or designated with the title of “Mother of God” [“God” being the English for the Greek [Tr.] word “Theos”] anywhere at all in any of the Scriptures by anyone?” Search as we will, the answer comes back as before to us as a plain, “No.” Again not convincing in and of itself, but let us again remember also this “silence” and come back to this point later.
Let us now consider a few statements by the Roman Catholic theological position and teaching on this subject of the “theotokos”, for it is said that:
"… Elizabeth is the first to call Mary by her most honourable title "Mother of God …" [Roman Catholic Online Encyclopedia; “V”; "The Blessed Virgin Mary"; subsection “The Visitation”] - http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/15464b.htmIt is taught by outward (catechumen) Catholicism that she is not the 'mother of divinity' (well and good), yet there is more said inwardly by the dogma, with hints all over the place at something more, and even openly stated with more:
"… As Mary was truly the mother of Jesus, and as Jesus was truly God from the first moment of His conception, Mary is truly the mother of God. … Theotokos …" [Roman Catholic Online Encyclopedia; “V”; "The Blessed Virgin Mary"; subsection “Mary's divine motherhood”] - http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/15464b.htmLet us look at the first quote again and ask yet another question. “Did Elizabeth [the cousin of Mary] ever call Mary by the “title” “Mother of God” in any part of the Scriptures?” Search as we will yet again, and the answer yet comes back to us as a plain, “No.”
Where then does the Roman Catholic theological position obtain the slightest ground from Scripture to say that Elizabeth says such?
Luke 1:43 is quoted, so we had better be careful to look at it:
Luke 1:43 KJB - And whence [is] this to me, that the mother of my Lord should come to me?
Luke 1:43 GNT TR - και ποθεν μοι τουτο ινα ελθη η μητηρ του κυριου μου προς με
Luke 1:43 Stephen's 1550 TR kai poqen moi touto ina elqh h mhthr tou kuriou mou proV me
Luke 1:43 Byzantine Majority TR - kai poqen moi touto ina elqh h mhthr tou kuriou mou proV me
Luke 1:43 Alexandrian Greek - kai poqen moi touto ina elqh h mhthr tou kuriou mou proV eme
Luke 1:43 Douay Rheims - And whence is this to me, that the mother of my Lord should come to me?
[Douay Rheims Online Bible THE HOLY BIBLE; TRANSLATED FROM THE LATIN VULGATE; DILIGENTLY COMPARED WITH THE HEBREW, GREEK, AND OTHER EDITIONS IN DIVERS LANGUAGES; THE OLD TESTAMENT FIRST PUBLISHED BY THE ENGLISH COLLEGE AT DOUAY, A. D. 1609; THE NEW TESTAMENT FIRST PUBLISHED BY THE ENGLISH COLLEGE AT RHEIMS, A. D. 1582 WITH ANNOTATIONS, REFERENCES, AND AN HISTORICAL AND CHRONOLOGICAL TABLE PUBLISHED WITH THE APPROBATION OF HIS EMINENCE JAMES CARDINAL GIBBONS ARCHBISHOP OF BALTIMORE; PUBLISHED WITH THE APPROBATION OF HIS EMINENCE JOHN CARDINAL FARLEY ARCHBISHOP OF NEW YORK; PUBLISHED WITH THE APPROBATION OF HIS EMINENCE WILLIAM CARDINAL O'CONNELL ARCHBISHOP OF BOSTON; NEW YORK; P. J. KENEDY & SONS; PRINTERS TO THE HOLY SEE; MCMXIV ] - https://web.archive.org/web/20120615073750/http://www.veritasbible.com//drbLuke 1:43 Clementine Vulgate - Et unde hoc mihi ut veniat mater Domini mei ad me?
[Clementine Latin Vulgate Online BIBLIA SACRA; VULGATÆ EDITIONIS; SIXTI V PONT. MAX. ;IUSSU RECOGNITA ET CLEMENTIS VIII; AUCTORITATE EDITA; EX TRIBUS EDITIONIBUS CLEMENTINIS CRITICE DESCRIPSIT, DISPOSITIONIBUS LOGICIS ET NOTIS EXEGETICIS ILLUSTRAVIT, APPENDICE LECTIONUM HEBRAICARUM ER GRÆCARUM AUXIT; P. MICHAEL HETZENAUER ORD. MIN. CAP. PROFESSOR EXEGESIS IN UNIVERSITATE PONTIFICII SEMINARII ROMANI; IMPRIMATUR; FR. ALBERTUS LEPIDI O.P., SACRI PALATII APOSTOLICI MAGISTER; IMPRIMATUR; FRANCISCUS FABERI, VICARIATUS URBIS ADSESSOR; RATISBONÆ ET ROMÆ; SUMPTIBUS ET TYPIS FRIDERICI PUSTET S. SEDIS APOSTOLICÆ ET S. RITUUM CONGR. TYPOGRAPHI NEO EBORACI ET CINCINNATI: APUD FR. PUSTET & Cᴼ.; MCMXIV ] - https://web.archive.org/web/20121014055422/http://www.veritasbible.com/lvb
Does the text read from the English or Tr. Greek that Mary was designated with the “title” “Mother of God” by Elizabeth? [Remember, we are looking for the words “mhthr tou theou mou” [Theos/God].]
The text obviously does not read the way it is claimed [intimated] that it does, for it plainly reads, “...mhthr tou kuriou mou...” [“...mother of my Lord...”]. This passage is supposed to be the strongest support pillar upholding the “theotokos” theological position, yet the pillar is non-existent, as is the word “theou”.
Since “The words of the LORD [are] pure words: [as] silver tried in a furnace of earth, purified seven times.” [Psalms 12:6] and “All Scripture [is] given by inspiration of God, and [is] profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:” [2 Timothy 3:16] and “...the scripture cannot be broken...” [John 10:35;p] and we are admonished to “Add thou not unto his words, lest he reprove thee, and thou be found a liar.” [Proverbs 30:6], it then behooves us to take special and careful attention to then heed what the words plainly say without having to add anything to them.
Before you get anything started learn who started Theotokos the Word and further before the RCC the Ancient Way taught this.