• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Does Church of Rome Hold the The True Gospel?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Vincent1

Member
They knew that God had command no blood,nor eating huamn flesh, so why would jesus ask them to do something hr stated already was wrong?

First, while it is the body and blood of he Lord, it is not flesh in the normal mode as anyone can see. It does not look like flesh or taste like blood so for you to continue to call it cannibalism is disingenuous.

To your other point, God commanded that we not eat pork, shellfish,etc. and yet....
Acts 10:13–15 (ASV): And there came a voice to him, Rise, Peter; kill and eat. 14But Peter said, Not so, Lord; for I have never eaten anything that is common and unclean. 15And a voice came unto him again the second time, What God hath cleansed, make not thou common.

So, even if the Lord commanded us to eat his flesh in the cannibalistic sense, could He not do so? Would you say “Not so, Lord”? Do you think the Lord is incapable of giving us his body under the appearance of bread? Just because it is hard to imagine does not make it untrue.
 

Adonia

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
His words are to be interpreted as Spirit, not flesh

His spirit wasn't sacrificed, His flesh was - and that is what He wanted us to uphold, to remember as we worship - His sacrifice, THE sacrifice, the blood atonement for the sins of all mankind.
 

Earth Wind and Fire

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
But what if Christ is a name for the transcendent within the heart of every “thing” in the universe? What if Christ is another name for every thing—in its fullness?

Then do we really need any organized religion to go to in order to feel fulfilled. Then everything belongs
 

HankD

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Last edited:

HankD

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
His spirit wasn't sacrificed, His flesh was - and that is what He wanted us to uphold, to remember as we worship - His sacrifice, THE sacrifice, the blood atonement for the sins of all mankind.
No one is denying that. As non-Catholics our issue is with the doctrine of transubstantiation.
However, I respect your belief and desire to serve and worship Him.

We should know of our differences, accept them as a reality within Christendom and (if possible) glorify Him as you have done in your statement above.
 

Vincent1

Member
No one is denying that. As non-Catholics our issue is with the doctrine of transubstantiation.
However, I respect your belief and desire to serve and worship Him.

We should know of our differences, accept them as a reality within Christendom and (if possible) glorify Him as you have done in your statement above.

I appreciate your charity Hank. We should all be so charitable with those we disagree with and acknowledge our common love for Him who died for us.
 

HankD

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I appreciate your charity Hank. We should all be so charitable with those we disagree with and acknowledge our common love for Him who died for us.
Agreed.- we should explain from scripture and background our faith values to achieve understanding rather than to promote confrontation.

Some debate may be called for but this one went into the realm of ad hominems on both views.
 

Vincent1

Member
Yes are not going to get a diehard Catholic to profess anything negative against “mother church”... it is ingrained in them.

Not true. Plenty of devoted Catholics are willing to admit faults in the Church. However, on this forum, in this type of thread in particular, Catholics should not be expected to concede an inch when others are taking a mile. I consider myself a guest on this site and I understand that and am appreciative of those of you willing to be charitable while still in disagreement. However, this thread is a perfect example of why many Catholics with whom you dialogue may not be forthcoming when discussing controversies in the Church. This thread was started as a pretense to attach the Church as the OP had no desire actually have an honest debate about what the Catholic Church teaches in regards to the Gospel. His discourse in this thread and others shows that he has no interest in actually researches what the Catholic Church teaches about this or any other topic. A few short minutes of research would disabuse him or the false notions he routinely presents. I think this says volumes about his intentions. That being said, I am sure you could find many Catholics willing to have a discussion about the Church when held in a setting where they are not eternally on the defensive. I have been a reader of this site for quite some time and I have the sense that you are a fair minded person so please do not take this as being addressed to you. I only hope to give you some insight into why you may be experiencing an unwillingness to speak negatively against the Church.
 

Earth Wind and Fire

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Not true. Plenty of devoted Catholics are willing to admit faults in the Church. However, on this forum, in this type of thread in particular, Catholics should not be expected to concede an inch when others are taking a mile. I consider myself a guest on this site and I understand that and am appreciative of those of you willing to be charitable while still in disagreement. However, this thread is a perfect example of why many Catholics with whom you dialogue may not be forthcoming when discussing controversies in the Church. This thread was started as a pretense to attach the Church as the OP had no desire actually have an honest debate about what the Catholic Church teaches in regards to the Gospel. His discourse in this thread and others shows that he has no interest in actually researches what the Catholic Church teaches about this or any other topic. A few short minutes of research would disabuse him or the false notions he routinely presents. I think this says volumes about his intentions. That being said, I am sure you could find many Catholics willing to have a discussion about the Church when held in a setting where they are not eternally on the defensive. I have been a reader of this site for quite some time and I have the sense that you are a fair minded person so please do not take this as being addressed to you. I only hope to give you some insight into why you may be experiencing an unwillingness to speak negatively against the Church.
Vincent, I don’t blame you with this lot. I persieved that they are not looking to explore Christian commonality, instead they are throwing rocks which Christ did not approve of. I for one am blessed to have had two members of my family who were both RC and transformed by the blessing of the Holy Spirit.
 

Adonia

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
No one is denying that. As non-Catholics our issue is with the doctrine of transubstantiation.
However, I respect your belief and desire to serve and worship Him.

We should know of our differences, accept them as a reality within Christendom and (if possible) glorify Him as you have done in your statement above.

Thank you for those kind words. I sometimes fall short as to how He would have me act in this life, and I constantly beseech Him for help every single day. I have learned much from, and certainly respect my fellow Christians whom I have come into contact with.
 

Adonia

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Then do we really need any organized religion to go to in order to feel fulfilled.

I think so. Organized religion gives us a place to call home, it gives us teaching, direction, provides a place to worship and it's good offices are able to help the poor and destitute in many ways. Did Jesus want a "church" here on earth? I really believe He did and don't the Scriptures tell us that?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top