But you have not proven anything. You provided Scripture and then stated an opinion which stood in contradiction with the Chalcedon Creed (Jesus as God did not tire is only one example of a rejection of the creed at least in part).I have already provided Scripture:
1. When the Lord Jesus came on board the boat, He was tired and weary so He went to sleep (Mark 4:35ff).
2. God does not get tired or weary (Isaiah 40:28)
3. Therefore the Lord Jesus is man as if He were not God.
Then
1. The Lord Jesus stilled the storm with a word. (Mark 4:39).
2. A man cannot still the storm with a word. Try it and let me know how you get on.
3. Therefore the Lord Jesus is God as if He were not man.
FWIW, As I pointed out before, this is entirely in line with the Chalcedon Creed.
And again, I am not one who would claim you have to accept the creed as a whole. So I don't have a problem if you prefer "separate and distinct".
But I disagree with the implication that God and man were not completely United in Christ. I think this is a denial of the concept of the reconciliation of mankind to God in Christ. At the same time I understand, from previous conversations, that this is something you may view from a legal rather than ontological basis. So there may be other areas influencing our disagreement here.
Do you consider "nature" here to be the same as used in Hebrews 1 (Christ nature - singular - being an exact representation of God's nature)?
A more accurate picture of both Scripture and the Creed would be:
1. When the Lord Jesus came on board the boat, He was tired and weary so He went to sleep (Mark 4:35ff).
2. God does not get tired or weary (Isaiah 40:28)
3. However we all know that Isaiah is speaking of God as spirit.
4. But the Logos became flesh, so God could tire physically (in a body)
5. Therefore Jesus as God-man grew weary.
Then
1. The Lord Jesus stilled the storm with a word. (Mark 4:39).
2. A man cannot still the storm with a word, except through faith and that God working through him as we see with Peter raising the dead.
3. Therefore the Lord Jesus is God-man. Not God and man (which is a heresy) but God-man.
To prove your point you would have to provide a passage stating that Jesus acted as if He were not God. I do not see that one exists.