1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Featured Two Prophecies in One

Discussion in 'Baptist Theology & Bible Study' started by John of Japan, Jan 14, 2019.

  1. Covenanter

    Covenanter Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2017
    Messages:
    2,206
    Likes Received:
    526
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I think your basic hermeneutic is questionable. Should we choose between literal & non-literal as we read OT prophecy? Rather, we should look for the relevance of prophecy to the immediate hearers, & then look for its fulfilment in the life & ministry of the LORD Jesus Christ.

    Thus the prophecy of Isaiah 9 begins with figurative language - light versus darkness;
    spiritual joy compared with natural joy at harvest & military victory;
    figurative yoke compared with military oppression;
    the burning of boots & garments used in war - the end of war and oppression, all resulting from the realisation of the Messianic prophecy.

    Is the "throne of David" always literal? An ornate chair in a Jerusalem palace? Did David only have one chair, still preserved somewhere for Jesus to sit on it?

    Note the way James quotes from Amos -
    9:11 ‘In that day
    ‘I will restore David’s fallen shelter –
    I will repair its broken walls and restore its ruins –
    and will rebuild it as it used to be,

    Acts 15:16 ‘“After this I will return
    and rebuild David’s fallen tent.
    Its ruins I will rebuild, and I will restore it,

    Was that happening literally? No. The tabernacle of David, the dwelling place of God is with his people, wherever they are, in spirit & in truth.

    Go back a bit -
    1 Sam. 8:7 And the LORD said unto Samuel, Hearken unto the voice of the people in all that they say unto thee: for they have not rejected thee, but they have rejected me, that I should not reign over them.

    The kings of Israel & Judah were sitting on the throne of the LORD, as Solomon recognised -
    1 Chr. 29:23 Then Solomon sat on the throne of the LORD as king instead of David his father, and prospered; and all Israel obeyed him.

    The concept of sitting on a throne is partly figurative - a king doesn't need to sit on a throne to be king - it is a sign of office.

    Remember the question Jesus asked?
    Luke 20:41 And he said unto them, How say they that Christ is David's son?

    Jesus is so much more - see Psalm 72 - replete with figurative language.

    The meaning of the figurative language in Isaiah 9 is clear, with a clear literal meaning in terms of our LORD Jesus Christ. And he won't need a chair in earthly Jerusalem - he is King of kings & LORD of lords.

    Thanks for the question, John - your comments are thought provoking & direct us to search the Scriptures.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  2. Revmitchell

    Revmitchell Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    52,030
    Likes Received:
    3,657
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Need has got nothing to do with it.
     
  3. John of Japan

    John of Japan Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2005
    Messages:
    19,633
    Likes Received:
    1,832
    Faith:
    Baptist
    We've been through this before. In fact, I did a whole thread on figures of speech once. If it is a figure of speech we exegete it as such. If it is not a figure of speech, it is literal. That is how we humans communicate, and we got that from God, who invented language.

    I did this, and no non-literalist on this thread has answered me yet. Every single mention of the throne of David until Is. 9 was a literal meaning. So how did it suddenly become metaphorical in Is. 9?

    Irrelevant to my points.

    Here is the BDB Hebrew lexicon definition of the Hebrew word for throne:

    "1) seat (of honour), throne, seat, stool
    1a) seat (of honour), throne
    1b) royal dignity, authority, power (figuratively)"
    This is all irrelevant to my OP. I wish someone would actually answer the OP.

    Go back a bit -
    1 Sam. 8:7 And the LORD said unto Samuel, Hearken unto the voice of the people in all that they say unto thee: for they have not rejected thee, but they have rejected me, that I should not reign over them.

    Well, of course. Have I said anything different?

    Well of course He is so much more. Come on, this is not a grammar school Bible class. None of this negates my points.

    Luke 1:32--"He shall be great, and shall be called the Son of the Highest: and the Lord God shall give unto him the throne of his father David."
    Once again my point: v. 6 is held to be literal by all. So why do some interpret v. 7 as symbolic, with no actual throne/reign of David for the Messiah?

    Excellent! That was the intent.
     
  4. agedman

    agedman Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2011
    Messages:
    11,023
    Likes Received:
    1,108
    Faith:
    Baptist
    During the millennial reign, The King of Kings rules from Jerusalem and compelling the nations of the world to pay Him tribute.

    One cannot be the King if there is no kingdom nor known as the King of Kings unless there are other kings.

    Grammar helps by establishing singular King and plural kings.

    The millennial reign physically ceases on earth, however, the reign continues after the judgment of the nations as the new heaven and earth are disclosed.

    The King of kings may certainly sit at the City of David ruling the nations the same as exampled by David and Solomon ruling over other “kings” other nations bringing tribute in their time.

    Literal throne at a literal place at a literal time.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
  5. John of Japan

    John of Japan Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2005
    Messages:
    19,633
    Likes Received:
    1,832
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Just to be clear, fellow Bible students, I'm talking about the throne of David as an equivalent kingdom rule. Therefore, it means someone in the lineage of David (that's Jesus all over) ruling over Israel. That does not limit the rule of Jesus to Israel. Christ will conquer the world at His second coming, so He will rule it as well as Israel. Alexander the Great did not cease to be the king of Greece when he conquered the world.

    Will it be a literal king's chair? I believe it will. Will it be the literal king's chair of David? It could be. God certainly could do that. Whether it is or not, it will be a genuine reign like David on a genuine throne, one you can sit on, as Christ Himself said: "When the Son of man shall come in his glory, and all the holy angels with him, then shall he sit upon the throne of his glory: And before him shall be gathered all nations: and he shall separate them one from another, as a shepherd divideth his sheep from the goats" (Matt. 25:31-32).
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  6. Jordan Kurecki

    Jordan Kurecki Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2013
    Messages:
    1,925
    Likes Received:
    130
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Why did Jesus say “NOW is my kindgom
    Not from hence”
     
    • Like Like x 1
  7. agedman

    agedman Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2011
    Messages:
    11,023
    Likes Received:
    1,108
    Faith:
    Baptist
    He brings the kingdom to establish rule on earth.

    He does not come into a kingdom as one who ascends to a thrown by birthright.
     
  8. David Kent

    David Kent Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2017
    Messages:
    2,374
    Likes Received:
    312
    Faith:
    Baptist
    So where is David's lteral throne at the present time?
     
  9. Aaron

    Aaron Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2000
    Messages:
    20,253
    Likes Received:
    1,381
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Yeah, I'm a Gnostic.

    Boo! Did I scare ya?
     
    • Funny Funny x 2
  10. kyredneck

    kyredneck Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2009
    Messages:
    20,493
    Likes Received:
    3,043
    Faith:
    Baptist
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Like Like x 1
  11. kyredneck

    kyredneck Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2009
    Messages:
    20,493
    Likes Received:
    3,043
    Faith:
    Baptist
    So who's gonna be 'literally' sitting on the 'literal' throne of David? Christ? Or 'literally' David?

    24 And my servant David shall be king over them; and they all shall have one shepherd: they shall also walk in mine ordinances, and observe my statutes, and do them.
    25 And they shall dwell in the land that I have given unto Jacob my servant, wherein your fathers dwelt; and they shall dwell therein, they, and their children, and their children`s children, for ever: and David my servant shall be their prince for ever. Ezek 37
     
    #31 kyredneck, Jan 16, 2019
    Last edited: Jan 16, 2019
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Like Like x 1
  12. kyredneck

    kyredneck Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2009
    Messages:
    20,493
    Likes Received:
    3,043
    Faith:
    Baptist
    FYI, JoJ has me on ignore, but I know that he peeks, he can't help but to.
     
    • Funny Funny x 2
  13. John of Japan

    John of Japan Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2005
    Messages:
    19,633
    Likes Received:
    1,832
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Well of course you're not a Gnostic. I never thought for a second you were! But you sure talked like one. :Biggrin
     
  14. John of Japan

    John of Japan Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2005
    Messages:
    19,633
    Likes Received:
    1,832
    Faith:
    Baptist
    The actual king's chair? Tell me who would know besides David or Jesus. But that's not the point of this thread, if that's what you mean. :rolleyes:

    The Davidic Covenant had two parts. Know what they are?
     
  15. percho

    percho Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2009
    Messages:
    7,551
    Likes Received:
    474
    Faith:
    Baptist

    Permit me to ask, maybe off topic yet maybe not.

    Men and brethren, let me freely speak unto you of the patriarch David, that he is both dead and buried, and his sepulchre is with us unto this day. For David, after he had served his own generation by the will of God, fell on sleep, and was laid unto his fathers, and saw corruption: Acts 2:29 KJV Acts 13:36

    And after my skin is destroyed, this I know,
    That in my flesh I shall see God, Job 1926

    Behold, I shew you a mystery; We shall not all sleep, but we shall all be changed, In a moment, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last trump: for the trumpet shall sound, and the dead shall be raised incorruptible, and we shall be changed. For this corruptible must put on incorruption, and this mortal must put on immortality. So when this corruptible shall have put on incorruption, and this mortal shall have put on immortality, then shall be brought to pass the saying that is written, Death is swallowed up in victory. 1 Cor 15:51-64

    Will David, in his flesh, see God? When? Will he have anything to do with ruling Israel, whether sitting or standing ?
     
  16. Aaron

    Aaron Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2000
    Messages:
    20,253
    Likes Received:
    1,381
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Lol, "Throne = reign." a tacit admission that the chair is really a symbol.

    But Christ has already conquered the world. 1 John 5:4 . (I bet you even sing that song.) And we are more than conquerors through Him that loved us. Romans 8:37 .

    Christ asked the Jews, "Whose son is Messiah?" They answered, David's. Christ said, "Haven't you read that David said, 'The LORD said unto my Lord, sit on my right hand until I make your enemies a footstool'? If David calls Him, Lord, how is He his son?" Because, Jesus isn't really David's son. According to the flesh, He was known as the Son of David, but now that He died and rose again, we henceforth know Him no more after the flesh. 2 Corinthians 5:16 .

    In short, David's throne was always Christ's. David just borrowed it. It pointed to Christ's rule over the household of faith and victory over the world. NOT a reestablishment of earthly, temporal rule and setting up one family of the earth over the others, and reactivation of butchery as a mode of worship.

    What a small, inglorious thing you guys are looking forward to.
     
    • Winner Winner x 4
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
  17. kyredneck

    kyredneck Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2009
    Messages:
    20,493
    Likes Received:
    3,043
    Faith:
    Baptist
    5 and one of the elders saith unto me, Weep not; behold, the Lion that is of the tribe of Judah, the Root of David, hath overcome to open the book and the seven seals thereof. Rev 5

    Outstanding post Aaron. Well articulated.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Like Like x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  18. Covenanter

    Covenanter Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2017
    Messages:
    2,206
    Likes Received:
    526
    Faith:
    Baptist
    That is a serious misunderstanding. Scripture is both history & typology, literal & figurative. All Scripture is subject to interpretation with respect to God's purposes in Christ.

    Who said "metaphorical?" You! We are dealing with what Hebrews calls "examples & shadows" - Heb 8:5 - and what Isaiah calls "signs and symbols" - Isaiah 8:18. Start reading Isaiah 9 from 8:1 through to 9:7 and you will see that the whole passage is figurative - Israel is in darkness, Messiah will bring light.

    Clear instruction & prophecy is given in figurative language. Figurative language so easy to understand that you call it "literal." Isaiah's baby is given a significant name, as was Ahaz' baby "Immanuel." - 7:14.


    Why do you reject the obvious meaning in the passage - 1b? It agrees with what I wrote - "The concept of sitting on a throne is partly figurative - a king doesn't need to sit on a throne to be king - it is a sign of office."

    Peter answers you in Acts 2 -
    29 ‘Fellow Israelites, I can tell you confidently that the patriarch David died and was buried, and his tomb is here to this day. 30 But he was a prophet and knew that God had promised him on oath that he would place one of his descendants on his throne. 31 Seeing what was to come, he spoke of the resurrection of the Messiah, that he was not abandoned to the realm of the dead, nor did his body see decay. 32 God has raised this Jesus to life, and we are all witnesses of it. 33 Exalted to the right hand of God, he has received from the Father the promised Holy Spirit and has poured out what you now see and hear. 34 For David did not ascend to heaven, and yet he said,

    ‘“The Lord said to my Lord:
    ‘Sit at my right hand
    35 until I make your enemies
    a footstool for your feet.’”

    36 ‘Therefore let all Israel be assured of this: God has made this Jesus, whom you crucified, both Lord and Messiah.’
    How can you maintain that our glorious Saviour God, our LORD Jesus Christ, King of kings & LORD of lords, will leave his heavenly throne to sit on a physical throne in an earthly city?
     
    • Like Like x 3
  19. John of Japan

    John of Japan Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2005
    Messages:
    19,633
    Likes Received:
    1,832
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Yes, a metaphor for "reign." How have I said any different? I thought everyone knew that from the OP.

    You're mixed up. Spiritual victory does not equal physical victory. In the providence of God, Satan is currently the ruler of the physical earth. "Wherein in time past ye walked according to the course of this world, according to the prince of the power of the air, the spirit that now worketh in the children of disobedience" (Eph. 2:2).
    2 Cor. 5:16 proves none of what you are trying to say. It's your pseudo-Gnosticism surfacing again. :p That verse does not mean that there is no longer anything physical about Christ. That would be heresy. He still has human DNA, as proven by His scars received on earth, and it is still the DNA of His physical ancestor David.

    So far I agree.

    Now I have no idea what you are talking about. "Reactivation of butchery as a mode of worship"? Really?
    Are you kidding me? Jesus ruling the world is "small" and "inglorious"???? That's sacrilegious.

    The 1000 year reign of Christ will be glorious and huge. It will glorify God in so many ways. How could it possibly be "small, inglorious"?
     
  20. John of Japan

    John of Japan Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2005
    Messages:
    19,633
    Likes Received:
    1,832
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Um, that's pretty much what I said.
    Please look up "metaphorical" in the dictionary. You are misunderstanding the meaning of the word.
    You are once more missing the point of the OP. Do you actually think that the prophecy of the incarnation in Is. 9:6 is not literal? Do you believe that Jesus is not a "Wonderful Counsellor, The mighty God, The everlasting Father, The Prince of Peace"?
    Okay, so the prophecies of Christ's first coming were not literal? He was not born of a virgin at Bethlehem, did not flee with His family to Egypt, etc., etc.????
    You are once again being insulting, the reason I put you on ignore before. You are accusing me of rejecting Scripture. That is a terrible accusation to make, and untrue. Rejecting your interpretation is not rejecting Scripture.
    Because that's what the Bible maintains in Is. 9:7 and many, many other passages. Do you somehow think that a physical throne is evil, or not worthy of Christ after His wonderful incarnation, becoming human?

    Also, simply because Christ will sit on David's throne does not mean he is no longer King of the Kingdom of God. That's pretty obvious to me.
     
    #40 John of Japan, Jan 17, 2019
    Last edited: Jan 17, 2019
Loading...