Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
New Example --> Your pastor holds up a cracker and juice and says, "This bread and wine is a symbol of our God. Pass it around and treat it with the highest respect. You may even consume it."
How is this not idolatry?
JonC,
Thank you for your reply. That seems logical to me. However, what if I made the following changes to my example...
Original Example --> Your pastor holds up an image of Jesus and says, "This is a symbol of our God. Pass it around and treat it with the highest respect. You may even kiss it."
New Example --> Your pastor holds up a cracker and juice and says, "This bread and wine is a symbol of our God. Pass it around and treat it with the highest respect. You may even consume it."
How is this not idolatry?
Uh smartie pants no one does it that way. You have intentionally misrepresented this.
Given the situation (the link between the two statements) I would say it is idolatry.JonC,
Thank you for your reply. That seems logical to me. However, what if I made the following changes to my example...
Original Example --> Your pastor holds up an image of Jesus and says, "This is a symbol of our God. Pass it around and treat it with the highest respect. You may even kiss it."
New Example --> Your pastor holds up a cracker and juice and says, "This bread and wine is a symbol of our God. Pass it around and treat it with the highest respect. You may even consume it."
How is this not idolatry?
I figured this was a trick question when I read the OP.
My pastor doesn't say, "Pass the cracker and grape juice around and treat it with the highest respect. You may even consume it." In fact, I've never heard that phrase before.
It's just a cracker and juice of a grape. It isn't meant to be respected. It's mean to be consumed.
The Lord's Supper is not idolatry. There's no idol. It's the following of a command of Christ to remember his body and blood that was shed.
God has declared ways to "remember" him that involve things. The rainbow, the Passover meal, and the Lord's Supper. We don't worship or idolize a rainbow nor did Jews idolize the Passover meal. These things are ways to keep in our hearts and minds what God has done and to teach each next generation.
The word "remember" in the Old Testament is repeated quite often. So is the word forget or forgotten.
God knew we wouldn't remember or hold things in our hearts so he established ways to remember.
Christ said to partake of the bread and wine as often as we like, but it was to be in remembrance of HIM. That's what it is in my church and all the other churches I've been in.
Given the situation (the link between the two statements) I would say it is idolatry.
Scripture tells us to partake of the Lord's Supper "in rememberance" of Him - not to treat the bread and wine or grape juice as if they were Christ Himself.
Does that answer your question?
I think a closer parallel would be Scriptre itself (i.e., the physical Bible itself).
"Smartie pants"? Nice ad hominem. A great way to welcome new posters to the forum. (Sarcasm)
I never said that the bread and wine/grape juice is "just" a symbol. I believe it is more than that (I believe it is a reaffirmation of the new covenant from the perspective of the believer).JonC,
Thanks for your reply. But if the bread and wine or grape juice is just a symbol, how then is remembering Him in those things not an act of idolatry? How is it any different than the first example I introduced?
I don't think Bible is a good parallel because the Bible is not said to symbolize God.
There is no trick question.
the way you have handled this thread is no way to introduce yourself to the forum.
Yes it was
Perhaps I should've taken your approach and introduced myself by lobbing an ad hominem.
I never said that the bread and wine/grape juice is "just" a symbol. I believe it is more than that (I believe it is a reaffirmation of the new covenant from the perspective of the believer).
When I was in the Army the flag that represented our unit was a catamount with a five pointed star. It symbolized our unit. Later it was a flag with three daggers. The US flag symbolizes our nation. And we give each of these respect representative of our relationship to what they symbolize. This is not idolatry. So at the very minimum the bread and wine/ juice is not idolatry because the thing is treated as a symbol and not what it represents.
Were we to worship the bread and wine/ juice then it would be idolatry. Were we to believe that the bread and wine/ juice IS the flesh and blood of Christ then it would be idolatry. But we (Baptists) do not believe this. Instead we observe the symbolism as it was commanded of us to do.
You would, however, have somewhat of a point (Scripture does not say not to "symbolize God") if God did not institute the Lord's Supper.
Or, you could have put your actual question in the op and not mischaracterized the Lord's Supper. I find your entire line of "questions" disingenuous and I have to say it is the first time I have ever seen the heresy of calling the Lord's Supper idolatrous.
During the middle of your worship service, if your pastor held up an image of Jesus and said, "This is a symbol of our God. Pass it around and treat it with the highest respect. You may even kiss it."
Would you object?
If so, why?
JonC,
Thank you for your reply. That seems logical to me. However, what if I made the following changes to my example...
Original Example --> Your pastor holds up an image of Jesus and says, "This is a symbol of our God. Pass it around and treat it with the highest respect. You may even kiss it."
New Example --> Your pastor holds up a cracker and juice and says, "This bread and wine is a symbol of our God. Pass it around and treat it with the highest respect. You may even consume it."
How is this not idolatry?