Estimated Dates of the Events of the 1 Year Great Tribulation of the Earth

No, this little horn is the antichrist, who will subdue 3 other rulers to consolidate his power. this hasn't happened yet.

And Epiphanes didn't commit the AOD, as Jesus said "When you see it".

 

MMRRPP ! WRONG !

THE abomination of desolation will be when the antichrist goes into the new temple the Jews will build in Jerusalem, set up his statue in it, & declare himself to be God.

 

It's entertaining to watch a Darbyist and a Judaizer (But I repeat myself) argue the fine points of their errors.

 

Admittedly it is all speculation!

 

No. Christ said the gospel would be preached throughout the world and then the end would come. That is happening now, not earlier.

 

MMRRPP ! WRONG AGAIN !

The AOD did NOT occur then. Remember, Daniel was told the KING would SET UP the AOD in the temple. The actions ascribed to this king, Paul's "man of sin", & the "beast from the sea" in Revelation shows all are referring to the SAME ONE MAN.

Titus was not the king. His father, Vespasian, was Caesar (king) then. Titus didn't enter the temple, nor declare himself to be God. The TRUE antichrist won't recognize any god but himself; Titus worshipped the Roman pantheon of gods/goddesses, repairing several of their shrines when he became Caesar.

And again, the AOD will be done by the REAL penultimate antichrist (Satan is the ultimate AC) by his entering the temple the Jews will build in Jerusalem, setting up his statue, and, aided by his sidekick the false prophet (the beast from the earth) declaring himself God. Obviously, this hasn't yet happened, as the Jews haven't yet built a new temple. (But they certainly have plans to build it !)

 

MMRRPP ! WRONG AGAIN !

Daniel was told no such thing.
No king was mentioned, neither was the temple.

"They" were to place the abomination that maketh desolate,

 

It's interesting that so many Christians are trying to recreate situation in the first century AD, while ignoring the numerous timing indicators that tell us the first century, and also ignoring the impossibility of recreating that situation.

Daniel says the "prince" (or ruler below a king) will destroy the temple and the city. Daniel doesn't say a king.

 

MMRRPP ! STILL WRONG !

Vespasian was Caesar 9 years past the destruction of the temple, dying in AD 79. Only then did Titus become Caesar.

He did NOT enter the temple, as more than one historian has stated, & he certainly didn't declare himelf to be God. Nor did he have a false prophet as a sidekick. Nor did he issue any "mark of the beast". You're still 'WAY short of showing us he committed the AOD ! And you'll STAY 'way short cuz he simply didn't do it, & he wasn't the "beast".

 

And the "they" will be the true beast, the false prophet, & their workmen.

 

No, he said "the prince of the PEOPLE...". And Daniel 9 says he shall SET UP the AOD. Titus did no such thing, and no desolation was poured out on him. He ruled the Roman empire in honor for about 2 years before dying of a fever.

 

Josephus was not a very reliable play-by-play reporter, being careful in his narratives to not write anything that might upset Vespasian & cost him his head. And I doubt if Titus was worshipped, as his men knew he was also a man, and Titus certainly didn't DEMAND to be worshipped.

The 2nd beast will be one man, a sidekick of the first, & the marka the beast will be a literal mark of some kind, most-likely some sorta microchip.

You have quite an imagination, but you don't know history too well, nor have you studied Scripture CLOSELY, with an open mind. You've invented some notions & tried to make Scripture fit them.