This thread has the unBiblical premise that the earth is somehow God's temple. The written word of God calls it His footstool. ". . . Thus saith the LORD, The heaven is my throne, and the earth is my footstool: . . ." -- Isaiah 66:1. ". . . Heaven is my throne, and earth is my footstool: . . ." -- Acts of the Apostles 2:49.
Is that really the argument put forth in the OP?
Perhaps I missed it.
But, as it points to John 3:16, here is were I disagree with a cited article.
The article’s ending paragraph states:
“The debate over LA is often characterized as a debate over the extent of the atonement. For whom did Christ die? For everyone or for the elect alone? But this isn’t quite right. The real issue concerns the intent of the atonement. For what specific purpose did God send his Son into the world to make atonement? Was it God’s purpose to try to save everyone (knowing that not everyone would be saved) or to save his chosen people (knowing that they would indeed be saved)? Was it God’s plan to make salvation generally available, in a indefinite fashion, or to actually save a definite group of people?” (John 3:16 Teaches Limited Atonement - The Aquila Report)
I don’t see the atonement as the focus of John 3:16 at all.
Folks generally take the word ”gave” as pointing to the crucifixion. I think that is a very weak assumption that I and most others have made.
Christ is stating factually the mission, “to seek and save....” was from the authority of the Father as the ultimate expression and only offer for eternal life.
Making the verse into a statement of atonement, other than the limit comes because not all believe, seems to be a ploy more commonly found in emotional persuasion by frenzied evangelist than the pure declaration of the Scriptures.
There are far better, more pointed single sentences from John that would better support the “extent” or even “intent” of the atonement.
Here is one: