many of the ECF were the ones we got how to understand NT theology from, and yet you declared them holding to premil as being heretics!No, the early Church condemned them recognizing Amillennialism as the teaching of the scriptures.
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
many of the ECF were the ones we got how to understand NT theology from, and yet you declared them holding to premil as being heretics!No, the early Church condemned them recognizing Amillennialism as the teaching of the scriptures.
It does not say that. You base your call on Dispensational bias and not from the scriptural comparison.Well, since you insist on derailing the thread, I'm going to ignore your ignoring of the plain Scriptural statement that Christ will reign for 1000 years, and bow out of the thread. Ta ta for now.![]()
They had to learn and in time they did. Jesus taught Amillennialism and Peter preached it at Pentecost Acts 2ff.many of the ECF were the ones we got how to understand NT theology from, and yet you declared them holding to premil as being heretics!
Jesus said his kingdom is not of this world. Why twist his words into Phariseeism?There is also just Jesus worshiped and heeded as King, as just Christianity is allowed as religion, guess Muslims have not yet gotten that memo!
It does not say that.
Out of obedience or out of love?I do not agree with Piper's theology as a whole. But I do like Piper (and John Owen) when it comes to the principle that God changes our desire (that we are conformed more and more into the "mind of Christ"). I like the book. I also do not care for the "Christen Hedonism" term, but if you read the book it does not take long to understand that Piper is redefining "hedonism".
Basically his claim (like the claim of John Owen) is that Christians have a "new heart" and new desires. The old is passed away and we are made new creatures. We sin, but we are never content in sin. We are only content when we are pleasing God.
The ultimate claim is that we desire God as believers where we did not prior to being saved. We desire to please God.
His Kingdom was not at that time, but will be at his second coming!Jesus said his kingdom is not of this world. Why twist his words into Phariseeism?
Out of our hearts being changed. You have to keep in mind Piper is a strong Calvinist (five points, plus double predestination). He believes that Christians are reborn and God takes out their old heart and gives them a new one (a new spirit, put's God's Spirit in them).Out of obedience or out of love?
Isn't that pretty much what Christianity has taught since time of Christ though?Out of our hearts being changed. You have to keep in mind Piper is a strong Calvinist (five points, plus double predestination). He believes that Christians are reborn and God takes out their old heart and gives them a new one (a new spirit, put's God's Spirit in them).
So his premise is that we obey out of love as our nature has been changed.
Yes. If you have read John Owen and then John Piper you will also see that they are very much alike.Isn't that pretty much what Christianity has taught since time of Christ though?
“But if I with the finger of God cast out devils, no doubt the kingdom of God is come upon you.” Luke 11:20 (NCPB)His Kingdom was not at that time, but will be at his second coming!
Before we were saved by the Lord, our desires were to please ourselves mainly!Yes. If you have read John Owen and then John Piper you will also see that they are very much alike.
His point is more relative to us, I think. What he saw was Christians who looked at obedience to God as if it were opposite to their desires. Piper's point is that we, being recreated, should have different desires (if we love God we should desire to please God....our desires change).
You have got to be kidding me. "Doesn't say that" my eye. What in the world else does "reign with him a 1000 years" mean????It does not say that. You base your call on Dispensational bias and not from the scriptural comparison.
The Kingdom was in and with Him at that time, but will be spread over whole earth when he returns!“But if I with the finger of God cast out devils, no doubt the kingdom of God is come upon you.” Luke 11:20 (NCPB)
The book is directed to Christians. What Piper is saying is that when we are saved we should have a mind that is set on the Spirit.Before we were saved by the Lord, our desires were to please ourselves mainly!
Two of mine are:
1689 London Baptist Confession of Faith
This book is absolutely essential if one is a Reformed Baptist!
Believer's Baptism: Sign of the New Covenant in Christ
Editors Thomas R. Schreiner and Shawn Wright
This book is amazing! The contributors deftly deal with all arguments in favor of paedobaptism.
Desiring God by John Piper.I have a radical ideal - Seeing that the OP is about
"Your favorite Baptist books"
So Why not just list your favorite book
If you want to get into a detailed discussion
start a new thread.
Note: this is just a suggestion - of a BB member
Not a requirement of an admin.
Only in the New Heavens and earth. Jesus says his kingdom is not of this world.The Kingdom was in and with Him at that time, but will be spread over whole earth when he returns!
Revelation is symbolic. You miss it completely expecting the symbols to appear instead of what they represent.You have got to be kidding me. "Doesn't say that" my eye. What in the world else does "reign with him a 1000 years" mean????
You need a course in logic, brother Dave.
His Kingdom was not at that time, but will be at his second coming!