• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

2nd Timothy 2:10

MB

Well-Known Member
This verse is addressed to a Jew named timothy. Paul's son. It is not addressed to Gentiles.
The first verse says who this chapter is to.
2Ti 2:1 Thou therefore, my son, be strong in the grace that is in Christ Jesus. This is Paul writng.
Brightfame quoted this verse Therefore I endure all things for the elect’s sakes, that they may also obtain the salvation which is in Christ Jesus with eternal glory..
This verse is true but it is addressed to a Jew the son of Paul. You failed to prove your election.
MB
 

canadyjd

Well-Known Member
This verse is addressed to a Jew named timothy. Paul's son. It is not addressed to Gentiles.
The first verse says who this chapter is to.
2Ti 2:1 Thou therefore, my son, be strong in the grace that is in Christ Jesus. This is Paul writng.
Brightfame quoted this verse Therefore I endure all things for the elect’s sakes, that they may also obtain the salvation which is in Christ Jesus with eternal glory..
This verse is true but it is addressed to a Jew the son of Paul. You failed to prove your election.
MB
Timothy was not literally Paul’s son. He considered him his son in the faith. Timothy was a Gentile.

You failed to prove your point.... again.

Edit to add: Acts 16:1-2. Timothy’s father was Gentile and mother was Jewish. Paul circumcised him so as not to offend Jews as they ministered the gospel.

peace to you
 
Last edited:

MB

Well-Known Member
Timothy was not literally Paul’s son. He considered him his son in the faith. Timothy was a Gentile.

You failed to prove your point.... again.

peace to you
Prove it. The Bible doesn't say this is so, so you failed
MB
 
Last edited:

MB

Well-Known Member
Timothy was not literally Paul’s son. He considered him his son in the faith. Timothy was a Gentile.

You failed to prove your point.... again.

Edit to add: Acts 16:1-2. Timothy’s father was Gentile and mother was Jewish. Paul circumcised him so as not to offend Jews as they ministered the gospel.

peace to you
This is as false as it comes.
Act 16:1 Then came he to Derbe and Lystra: and, behold, a certain disciple was there, named Timotheus, the son of a certain woman, which was a Jewess, and believed; but his father was a Greek: The Jew nationality is handed down through the mother. All of the disciples were Jews.

You're the one who needs to study LOL1:rolleyes:
MB
 
Last edited:

Dave G

Well-Known Member
This verse is addressed to a Jew named timothy. Paul's son. It is not addressed to Gentiles.
This is as false as it comes.
Act 16:1 Then came he to Derbe and Lystra: and, behold, a certain disciple was there, named Timotheus, the son of a certain woman, which was a Jewess, and believed; but his father was a Greek: The Jew nationality is handed down through the mother. All of the disciples were Jews.
You did read and comprehend the passage, didn't you sir?
It clearly says that Timothy's father was a gentile ( Greek ).
 

SGO

Well-Known Member
Who is a Jew According to halakhah (Jewish Religious Law)?
According to Jewish law, a child born to a Jewish mother or an adult who has converted to Judaism is considered a Jew; one does not have to reaffirm their Jewishness or practice any of the laws of the Torah to be Jewish. According to Reform Judaism, a person is a Jew if they were born to either a Jewish mother or a Jewish father. Also, Reform Judaism stresses the importance of being raised Jewish; if a child is born to Jewish parents and was not raised Jewish then the child is not considered Jewish. According to the Orthodox movement, the father’s religion and whether the person practices is immaterial. No affirmation or upbringing is needed, as long as the mother was Jewish.

Besides for differing opinions on patrilineal descent, the various streams also have different conversion practices. Conversion done under the auspices of an Orthodox rabbi, entails Jewish study, brit milah (for men), mikvah (for both men and women) and a stated commitment to follow the laws of the Torah. Conservative conversions use the same requirements as the Orthodox do; however, conversions by the Reform movement and other streams do not have the same requirements. Since the conversion practices are not uniform, many Orthodox Jews do not recognize Reform or Conservative conversions as valid and, hence, do not consider the converts Jews. Once a person has converted to Judaism, he is not referred to by any special term; he is as much a Jew as anyone born Jewish.

Who Is A Jew?


Although the Hebrew Bible defines Jewish identity in patrilineal terms (determined by the identity of the father) the Mishnah states that the offspring of a Jewish mother and a non-Jewish father is recognized as a Jew, while the offspring of a non-Jewish mother and a Jewish father is considered a non-Jew. This talmudic position became normative in Jewish law.

Who Is a Jew: Patrilineal Descent | My Jewish Learning

In Christ there is neither Jew nor Greek.
Galatians 3:28
 

canadyjd

Well-Known Member
This is as false as it comes.
Act 16:1 Then came he to Derbe and Lystra: and, behold, a certain disciple was there, named Timotheus, the son of a certain woman, which was a Jewess, and believed; but his father was a Greek: The Jew nationality is handed down through the mother. All of the disciples were Jews.

You're the one who needs to study LOL1:rolleyes:
MB
You said Timothy was Paul’s son. That was wrong. Clearly you did little research before posting.

Paul is concerned with Timothy serving as a minister of the gospel of Jesus Christ. His use of “elect” is referring to those under Timothy’s ministry. Christians.

peace to you
 

MB

Well-Known Member
You said Timothy was Paul’s son. That was wrong. Clearly you did little research before posting.

Paul is concerned with Timothy serving as a minister of the gospel of Jesus Christ. His use of “elect” is referring to those under Timothy’s ministry. Christians.

peace to you
You and your brother Dave are both wrong. The Jewish line is passed through the mother this why Mary had to be a virgin.Neither you or Dave know anything about this at all
 

canadyjd

Well-Known Member
You and your brother Dave are both wrong. The Jewish line is passed through the mother this why Mary had to be a virgin.Neither you or Dave know anything about this at all
I am aware of Jewish tradition concerning genealogies. That doesn’t come into play in 2 Tim.

Timothy was raised as a Christian, both his grandmother and mother were Christians. Timothy was a Christian when Paul met him and his family.

Paul has identified himself in 2 Tim as the Apostle to the Gentiles. His focus for Timothy is to serve as a Christian minister to Gentiles in Eph.

His use of “elect” in 2Tim is referring to Christians in general and Gentile Christians in particular.

I don’t know much about OUR brother Dave (and I hope you consider him a brother in Christ), but he seems to have reasonable arguments based on scripture.

peace to you
 

Iconoclast

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
You said Timothy was Paul’s son. That was wrong. Clearly you did little research before posting.

Paul is concerned with Timothy serving as a minister of the gospel of Jesus Christ. His use of “elect” is referring to those under Timothy’s ministry. Christians.

peace to you
Now it us clear why he holds ideas no one else does. What is worse is he does not want the answers
 

canadyjd

Well-Known Member
Now it us clear why he holds ideas no one else does. What is worse is he does not want the answers
There appears to be a strong conviction the word “elect” can only apply to Jews.

It is a unique argument, to me, to dismiss NT passages concerning election to salvation.

There is an acknowledgement of the meaning of “elect”, just a refusal to see it applies to Christians.

peace to you
 

Yeshua1

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
There appears to be a strong conviction the word “elect” can only apply to Jews.

It is a unique argument, to me, to dismiss NT passages concerning election to salvation.

There is an acknowledgement of the meaning of “elect”, just a refusal to see it applies to Christians.

peace to you
How cam one be saved then, and not be one of the Elect?
 

MB

Well-Known Member
You said Timothy was Paul’s son. That was wrong. Clearly you did little research before posting.

Paul is concerned with Timothy serving as a minister of the gospel of Jesus Christ. His use of “elect” is referring to those under Timothy’s ministry. Christians.

peace to you
You're still denying that Timothy was a Jew and this is because you wish to apply election to your self. Though you have never proven you are elect/. You've lost the argument that he was a Gentile.
MB
 

Yeshua1

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
You're still denying that Timothy was a Jew and this is because you wish to apply election to your self. Though you have never proven you are elect/. You've lost the argument that he was a Gentile.
MB
So God ha s a salvation plan for the Jews, and another for the gentiles?
 

canadyjd

Well-Known Member
You're still denying that Timothy was a Jew and this is because you wish to apply election to your self. Though you have never proven you are elect/. You've lost the argument that he was a Gentile.
MB
Whether Timothy was a Jew is irrelevant. Timothy was a Christian minister in Ephesus. Paul identified himself as an apostle to the Gentiles, then comes the passage concerning enduring for the “elect”.

The context is clear. Paul was referring to Christians in general and Gentile Christians in particular when he used the word “elect”.

We are just talking passed each other now, so I’ll leave you to it.

Thanks for the conversation

peace to you
 

Iconoclast

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
There appears to be a strong conviction the word “elect” can only apply to Jews.

It is a unique argument, to me, to dismiss NT passages concerning election to salvation.

There is an acknowledgement of the meaning of “elect”, just a refusal to see it applies to Christians.

peace to you

He does not understand the flow of biblical revelation.
Only Israel was given the written word of God. God had at first singled them out.
Romans 3 King James Version (KJV)
3 What advantage then hath the Jew? or what profit is there of circumcision?

2 Much every way: chiefly, because that unto them were committed the oracles of God.

Of course it sounds like Israel only; Deut7

6 For thou art an holy people unto the Lord thy God: the Lord thy God hath chosen thee to be a special people unto himself, above all people that are upon the face of the earth.

7 The Lord did not set his love upon you, nor choose you, because ye were more in number than any people; for ye were the fewest of all people:

8 But because the Lord loved you, and because he would keep the oath which he had sworn unto your fathers, hath the Lord brought you out with a mighty hand, and redeemed you out of the house of bondmen, from the hand of Pharaoh king of Egypt.

9 Know therefore that the Lord thy God, he is God, the faithful God, which keepeth covenant and mercy with them that love him and keep his commandments to a thousand generations;

God had made provision for the gentiles in the Covenant but The rejection during the Truimphal entry needed to officially happen.
 

MB

Well-Known Member
Whether Timothy was a Jew is irrelevant. Timothy was a Christian minister in Ephesus. Paul identified himself as an apostle to the Gentiles, then comes the passage concerning enduring for the “elect”.

The context is clear. Paul was referring to Christians in general and Gentile Christians in particular when he used the word “elect”.

We are just talking passed each other now, so I’ll leave you to it.

Thanks for the conversation

peace to you
Yes the context is clear even though it is addressed to the Jews Paul preached in synagogues. He even went to prison for bringing Gentiles into the synagogue. I know my self I do not go in to synagogues for the simple reason I'm not welcomed there.
You are applying this to your self and unless you are a Jew you are not elect. No where in scripture is it ever required that we have to be elect to be saved.
MB
 

MB

Well-Known Member
So God ha s a salvation plan for the Jews, and another for the gentiles?
If this is what you think you are wrong. Just like us we have to believe in Jesus Christ and that He died for the world and rose again to pay for our sins.
MB
 
Top