George Antonios
Well-Known Member
We were under his wrath before salvation.
That wasn't the question though.
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
We were under his wrath before salvation.
I must agree there. Our brother @SavedByGrace should read how the KJV uses should : it's often in the sense of would.All it shows is that you don't understand King James English.
Look at Genesis 28.10-15Look at Psalm 106.40
None of which is relevant to the OP and the point he was making.So you acknowledge the possibility that God did hate you before salvation.
Thus you acknowledge the possibility of God hating someone at one point in time, but loving them at another.
Thus you acknowledge the possibility of God both hating and loving someone - depending on the situation.
And you've certainly read:
Hosea 9:15 All their wickedness is in Gilgal: for there I hated them: for the wickedness of their doings I will drive them out of mine house, I will love them no more: all their princes are revolters.
So that he once loved Israel but then ceased, because of their wickedness.
Just saying.
None of which is relevant to the OP and the point he was making.
Just saying.
(PS: Placed like you describe it, it sounds as if God might need to change, which is an impossibility and contra-scriptural. I think you may have proven that God did not hate me before I was saved.)
He has to because he does not want an answer, but just oppose truthSadly you keep lying about our position.
He has to because he does not want an answer, but just oppose truth
To claim God changes, or changes his mind may, indeed be contra-scriptural:Also, it can't be "contra-scriptural" if it's said in the "scriptures", as was shown.
You have every right to throw down a gauntlet, but you might want to reread his post and throw down the correct gauntlet ... he is accusing you of not understanding Reformed Theology. He has not attacked your Greek in the quoted post.You calim to know Greek, and attack my knowledge of the language. I challenge you here in open forum to prove my OP Greek to be wrong!
You have every right to throw down a gauntlet, but you might want to reread his post and throw down the correct gauntlet ... he is accusing you of not understanding Reformed Theology. He has not attacked your Greek in the quoted post.
Quick question just based on what seems to me to be "in your face" obvious about John 3:16 ...Although noble on the surface (and what believer would not agree with that statement?), it is in fact a confession that the interpretation limiting the sense of world and whosoever to only the pool of the elect, as Calvinistically understood, is not possible in John 3 - which was the OP's point to begin with.
I know that is not the exact question you asked. I gave you a nuanced answer purposefully.That wasn't the question though.
To claim God changes, or changes his mind may, indeed be contra-scriptural:
- [1Sa 15:29 NASB] 29 "Also the Glory of Israel will not lie or change His mind; for He is not a man that He should change His mind."
- [Psa 55:19 NASB] 19 God will hear and answer them-- Even the one who sits enthroned from of old-- Selah. With whom there is no change, And who do not fear God.
- [Psa 110:4 NASB] 4 The LORD has sworn and will not change His mind, "You are a priest forever According to the order of Melchizedek."
- [Jer 4:28 NASB] 28 "For this the earth shall mourn And the heavens above be dark, Because I have spoken, I have purposed, And I will not change My mind, nor will I turn from it."
- [Mal 3:6 NASB] 6 "For I, the LORD, do not change; therefore you, O sons of Jacob, are not consumed.
- [Heb 7:21 NASB] 21 (for they indeed became priests without an oath, but He with an oath through the One who said to Him, "THE LORD HAS SWORN AND WILL NOT CHANGE HIS MIND, 'YOU ARE A PRIEST FOREVER'");
I know that is not the exact question you asked. I gave you a nuanced answer purposefully.
Quick question just based on what seems to me to be "in your face" obvious about John 3:16 ...
Why is it impossible for God to:
- "love the world" (be that men from every nation and all men and all of creation; each in a different way) and send His son ...
- men from every nation: Revelation 5:9
- all men: Ezekiel 18:32
- all of creation: Genesis 1:31
- so that "whoever believes" (which is not everyone because not everyone believes) will not perish.
- John 3:18
John 3:16 always seemed like an important verse about the intentions of God (something we get few glimpses into) and a terrible proof text for the Calvinism/Arminianism debate.
Are you telling me to take a Sharpie to the verses that I posted, because God does change and God does change his mind?You do realize that I've already quoted a verse where God stops loving people and begins hating them, right?
Are you telling me to take a Sharpie to the verses that I posted, because God does change and God does change his mind?![]()
Are you telling me to do the same?
My point is you can't ignore the verses you want and keep the ones you want.
All must be reconciled.
can you guys start your own thread?