SavedByGrace
Well-Known Member
Where does the 1689 Baptist Confession state Jesus is not fully God?
Look what I am responding to
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Where does the 1689 Baptist Confession state Jesus is not fully God?
Each one of them have unique roles to do, as Jesus is the great High Priest. not the father
Just the whole Bible.No support for the free will Gospel some hold to here
Then why would Christ say I and my father are one?Each one of them have unique roles to do, as Jesus is the great High Priest. not the father
An invitation is an offer made by freewill.No support for the free will Gospel some hold to here
God's plan is observed in scripture and your Reformed brother's are pointing it out to you. Thus, your comments come off as rejecting observable, factual data found in the Bible. Your defacto process is to reject these observable points in scripture by labeling them "Calvinism" yet they aren't writings of John Calvin, they are doctrines clearly presented in the Bible, by God's ordained writers. You might as well call it Paulism or Peterism, or Johnism or Lukeism. It's observable in the Bible.God's plan isn't nonsense but your Calvinism is.
MB
He doth stumble over the word "pleased."you show your foolishness! There is not ONE verse in the entire Bible that supports the reformed heresy that God was PLEASED when Adam and Eve sinned against Him!
An invitation is an offer made by freewill.
Rom 10:13 For whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved.
Mat 11:28 Come unto me, all ye that labour and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest.
MB
LOL You have quite an imagination. It sure is a fact, if you come to Him He will save you.Romans 10:13 is a statement of fact, not an invitation.
Matthew 11:28 is a statement of fact to Jesus hearers who were burdened down by the load of added laws given them by the Pharisees. Jesus says to them "Take my yoke upon you for it is light," meaning that his teaching lifts the burden of the law off their shoulders. Therefore, Jesus tells them to come to him. Again, this is a statement of fact.
Prove what you said here or others will see you are a false teacher. You can't back it up can you?He doth stumble over the word "pleased."
You seem like a JW.. With no truth at all.God's plan is observed in scripture and your Reformed brother's are pointing it out to you. Thus, your comments come off as rejecting observable, factual data found in the Bible. Your defacto process is to reject these observable points in scripture by labeling them "Calvinism" yet they aren't writings of John Calvin, they are doctrines clearly presented in the Bible, by God's ordained writers. You might as well call it Paulism or Peterism, or Johnism or Lukeism. It's observable in the Bible.
So what passage do you use to teach: "If you come, Jesus will save you."? It certainly isn't Matthew 11:28.LOL You have quite an imagination. It sure is a fact, if you come to Him He will save you.
MB
You ignore the fact that in both verses it is the work of God that is effective, not "free will" of the hearers. Please make an attempt to view salvation from God's view rather than constantly remain man-centered.
Your ignorance of theology makes you unable to discern if you imagine I am a follower of Charles Taze Russell.You seem like a JW.. With no truth at all.
MB
He doth stumble over the word "pleased."Prove what you said here or others will see you are a false teacher. You can't back it up can you?
MB
Many people hate what they do not understand.I admit I hate the doctrines of Calvinism. I do not hate Calvinist. Not even you Austin. If I hated Calvinist I would not even try to place them on the right path.
MB
One reason you believe in salvation based on works is you do not welcome confessional truth that is firmly rooted in scripture. Your deliberate twisting of the wording shows you have an agenda.I said that it is lazy for Christians to use these "creeds/confessions" for their theology, and not turn to the Bible itself. I have shown the danger of these "confessions", where the language used is very much against what the Bible teaches, and yet there are some who will continue to try and defend them!
They are scriptural when you do not change the wording.then WHY have one as Christians, if they are not Scriptural? It makes no sense at all
you show your foolishness! There is not ONE verse in the entire Bible that supports the reformed heresy that God was PLEASED when Adam and Eve sinned against Him!
is that the wording used?No it is not. why do you feel the need to be dishonest?
which God was pleased, according to his wise and holy counsel to permit, having purposed to order it to his own glory.