It does not matter who is at got questions...he got this basic definition correct.Chapter III.
Of God’s Eternal Decree.
I. God from all eternity did, by the most wise and holy counsel of His own will, freely, and unchangeably ordain whatsoever comes to pass:
Chapter III.
Of God’s Eternal Decree.
VII. The rest of mankind God was pleased, according to the unsearchable counsel of His own will, whereby He extendeth or withholdeth mercy, as He pleaseth, for the glory of His sovereign power over His creatures, to pass by; and to ordain them to dishonour and wrath, for their sin, to the praise of His glorious justice.
Now Iconoclast would you not agree that if God ordains whatever comes to pass and does that freely of His own will, that must include everything that comes to pass. Remember your sovereign God determines all things not just somethings. As one of your calvinist lights has said:
"God is incapable of knowing an undetermined future, and therefore, for God to be omniscient and all-knowing, no future could be left undetermined, or better yet, unscripted." (James White, Debating Calvinism, p.163)
In case you are unsure what he means by nothing left undetermined or unscripted, he is just saying that whatever happens is made to happen by God, good or bad.
So when the WCF or the LBCF says God has “ordain them to dishonour and wrath, for their sin” He is just doing that to them for sin that He ordained them to have.
I agree the bible does not say that God elects people to go to hell, the problem is that your theology does do that. So you have just agreed that your theology is not biblical.
Just a side note here, you may think that the information from a calvinist web site is good but it really does not impress me.
FYI the web site Got Questions is run by the person that called himself Humble Disciple.
I use the 1689 confession of faith and it does not read as you write here.
Also I have heard Dr.White teach on these things in person and know what he means on these things.
It is clear you desire to twist and distort what is taught by your own warped logic which is at odds with the confessional statement as well as Dr Whites teaching.
The difference is we know God is not the author of sin which you desire to ascribe to Him.
Your twisted ideas are not going to get far here.