How Far Are The Pro-Vaxers Willing To Go?

If he did that, he might have to admit he's like the rest of us rather than superior to us.

Perish the thought!

I'm sure this guy is probably a great dude w/ whom to hang ... have a meal ... stand a barn ... whatever.

But the online persona takes on the "long haired Harry" ... refusing to accept PMs is questionable.

 

I think I'll take issue with your acceptance of their labels. Those pushing the cv jabs as the sole mechanism toward herd immunity, and who are at the same time maligning and marginalizing other eminent and effective treatments are not "pro-vax." They are either part of the communist revolution here and tyrants, or their useful idiots.

Neither are those who opt out of the cv jabs on the basis of their own conscience or risk analyses, or who merely resist them to push back on the health tyranny "anti-vax."

The long and the short of it is, this vax rollout is not about health. It's about freedom or slavery.

 

The basic difference between a totalitarian state and a free state.

American arguing with Soviet:
I can stand in front of the White House and suffer no consequences for railing against the president of the United States.

Soviet counterargument:
So, what? I can stand in front of the Kremlin and suffer no consequences for railing against the President of the United States.

 

Just spittin' in the wind, RR, just spittin in the wind!

 

Only those with sufficient discernment would be expected to understand the application. Clearly the joke indicates the difference in the way the two types of states operate.

 

The better question is:
How far wil antivaxers go in disobedience to God, while still maintaining they are justified?

 

Oh, "come on, man." My post shifted nothing. Nor did my wry comment, which would seem unwise to embrace as personally applicable.

The joke illustrates the basic difference. My post said nothing of definitions. It was all too obviously "application."

The suggestion of dishonesty could easily be considered a display of ignorance or dishonesty. Better to dispense with that nonsense altogether.

 

There is no doubt that the federal government exercises far more authority over the states than is constitutional, but "complete subservience" has not yet been reached even at that level. For now. For how much longer remains to be seen.

 

That's his M.O. Rip, to dishonestly twist and misrepresent what you've said. I'm amazed he hasn't accused you yet of being a RC operative or peddling the council of Trent.

 

Understood. The posts were not an attempt to be dishonest, only to bring focus to full blown totalitarianism.

And yes, there is a definite tendency toward it. However, the mentality seems to show its ugly face among the Dem Progressive Left helped by RINOs, both of whom seriously outed themselves two basic ways:

First, by accusing Trump of being totalitarian because he is pro-America, and

Second, by pushing obvious measures to undermine the constitutional rights of Americans.​

 

Not so. Totalitarianism would not spell doom for a party prepared to wield it. Not if enough rights have been eroded.

One of the most bizarre aspects of modern American politics is that one party not only survives but thrives on openly pushing for totally undermining COTUS and stripping Americans of their right to be "self-governed." This is coming solely from the Progressive Left--the Dem Progressive Left.