1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Featured My Wish List For The Top Eleven ...

Discussion in 'Bible Versions & Translations' started by RipponRedeaux, Jan 17, 2022.

  1. Conan

    Conan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2019
    Messages:
    2,062
    Likes Received:
    334
    Faith:
    Baptist
    True! Very true.
    But "guilt by association fallacy" (thank you Logos1560) should not be used in determining the outcome. An untruth of "onlyist" should not be used in the highly important task.
     
    • Useful Useful x 1
  2. George Antonios

    George Antonios Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2019
    Messages:
    2,895
    Likes Received:
    298
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Right, same problem if the NWT reads like the others.

    Right, and the JWs had to FORSAKE the KJB.
     
  3. George Antonios

    George Antonios Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2019
    Messages:
    2,895
    Likes Received:
    298
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Watch the video first.
     
  4. Logos1560

    Logos1560 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2004
    Messages:
    6,602
    Likes Received:
    464
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Why waste time watching it? You fail to demonstrate that any worthwhile, convincing evidence is presented in the video that is different from the typical inconsistent and unjust allegations in 150 KJV-only books and in hundreds of KJV-only posts. You could repeat and present any claimed proof supposedly in the video so it could be evaluated and tested.
     
  5. RipponRedeaux

    RipponRedeaux Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2019
    Messages:
    2,094
    Likes Received:
    306
    Faith:
    Baptist
    What exactly are the "things into the text that don't exist"? That is a mystifying remark that demands an explanation.

    What specifically are the "very terrible things to the text that are in no other Bible translation" you are rattling on about?

    Anyone can throw mud, as you are doing. However, it's time to put up or shut up. Start a thread and prove your absurd contentions. Validate by citing texts and giving your explanations.
     
  6. 5 point Gillinist

    5 point Gillinist Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2022
    Messages:
    465
    Likes Received:
    130
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I don't know why you've wrapped up your pride in defending the 2011 NIV, I explained to you over messenger that my disdain is for the CHANGES made in the 2011, but you refuse to just accept that. I made one comment in passing, of which you can't let go of. You are more than aware of the controversy surrounding it and the TNIV, I'm sure you can figure out why I dislike them, and I have no intention of going into all the details as I really don't care enough to - I hope you can find it within yourself to move on soon.
     
    #46 5 point Gillinist, Jan 24, 2022
    Last edited: Jan 24, 2022
    • Like Like x 1
  7. RipponRedeaux

    RipponRedeaux Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2019
    Messages:
    2,094
    Likes Received:
    306
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I will defend any Bible translation (with the exception of Joseph Smith's Inspired Translation and others of that ilk) when opponents besmirch it with such vile language.

    It's not a matter of pride at all. How can the Word of God be allowed to be thrown into the garbage? I will not stand idly by.

    You have yet to explain anything specific about the NIV. You have only let mud fly with no mention of specifics. You have the temerity to say you don't want to go into details because you don't care enough to do so. That's what a sniper does. You just want to say horrible things and expect that will be enough and just drive on to your next target and not engage. I sincerely doubt that you would stand by if a loved one was defamed or anything you hold dear was dishonored. Don't be a hypocrite.

    You even call the current NIV the TNIV which proves your ignorance of the subject matter. You have been to too many KJVO websites which are the equivalent of gossip rags. Time for you to do your own homework.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  8. RipponRedeaux

    RipponRedeaux Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2019
    Messages:
    2,094
    Likes Received:
    306
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I forgot all about two more translations that haven't made any best selling lists, but deserve credit.

    The New English Bible (NET)
    The Lexham English Bible (LEB)

    Aside from the CSB, the NET translation is quite similar to the NIV.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  9. McCree79

    McCree79 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2015
    Messages:
    2,232
    Likes Received:
    305
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Agreed. The NET and LEB are both extremely under appreciated.

    Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk
     
  10. Conan

    Conan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2019
    Messages:
    2,062
    Likes Received:
    334
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I had thought it was "New English Translation", not the British Bible.
     
  11. RipponRedeaux

    RipponRedeaux Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2019
    Messages:
    2,094
    Likes Received:
    306
    Faith:
    Baptist
    You're right.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  12. RipponRedeaux

    RipponRedeaux Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2019
    Messages:
    2,094
    Likes Received:
    306
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I'm deviating from my own OP here. I think the 2nd edition of the Phillips translation is worthwhile to consult now and then. I had a copy, but in my travels and lost packages of lost books I no longer have it. I do have the 1958 edition though. The 1972 edition is not as wild as The Message or the Cotton Patch Gospel; nor is it as free as the original Living Bible in my estimation.

    The Norlie New Testament In Plain English is a rare find. I got my copy in South Korea. Olaf Norlie started his work in the 1940s publishing the Gospel of John. Some time in the 1950s he published the New Testament. My copy is from a 1993 edition courtesy of Spear Publishing.

    An American translation by Edgar Goodspeed is a companion of mine. I have the 1948 edition printed in 1951. Goodspeed was known as a theological liberal, but his new Testament is pretty good, with flaws here and there.

    I checked and both the Norlie translation and Goodspeed's N.T. used mainstay theological words such as atonement, sanctification, justification and predestination and their cognates.

    Richard Latimore's New Testament, published in 1982 is a worthy version. He wasn't a Bible scholar, but he was a Greek scholar. I made a thread dedicated to his work years ago under my first handle as Rippon.

    One can gain an appreciation by reviewing these versions from time to time. It's a refreshing exercise.
     
Loading...