Reformed1689
Well-Known Member
Except none of those verses speak of such a redemption. You are reading that into the verses.A redemption which was and is provided for everyone. Also known as the [general] redemption.
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Except none of those verses speak of such a redemption. You are reading that into the verses.A redemption which was and is provided for everyone. Also known as the [general] redemption.
I don't tell ANYONE Christ paid for their sins. I call for them to repent and believe, and follow Christ. Is there a verse where someone while evangelizing told a sinner that Christ paid for their sin? I'm asking, I don't know the answer, I do not believe there is.Denial of the general redemption does not explain to anyone that Christ paid for that person's sins so that one should believe in Christ.
That is probably NOT the point that they are making. John Wesley is probably the father of modern "synergystic" theology (the Methodist Church and Holiness Movement sprang from his teaching) but I doubt Wesley ever suggested what you are about evangelism.Or is the claimed being made here that in the Cross of Christ all indeed have been redeemed, and are saved until and unless they choose to reject their salvation> If so, why even have missions or preaching of the Gospel message then?
So if its the non redemptive then it cant save. There is no reason to put faith in a non redemptive death of Christ.Yes, for those who refuse the gift. John 3:18. John 3:36. 1 Peter 4:17. 2 Thessalonians 1:8.
We would not know who the elect are of the Lord, so would give to all same Gospel, and allow God to do His saving work!I don't tell ANYONE Christ paid for their sins. I call for them to repent and believe, and follow Christ. Is there a verse where someone while evangelizing told a sinner that Christ paid for their sin? I'm asking, I don't know the answer, I do not believe there is.
was just clarifying if that is the position was being held hereThat is probably NOT the point that they are making. John Wesley is probably the father of modern "synergystic" theology (the Methodist Church and Holiness Movement sprang from his teaching) but I doubt Wesley ever suggested what you are about evangelism.
We need to reject what others actually believe and not some imaginary caricature of their beliefs.
Which is what I said.We would not know who the elect are of the Lord, so would give to all same Gospel, and allow God to do His saving work!
Non-redemptive to those who do not put their faith in Christ. 1 Timothy 4:10, ". . . we trust in the living God, who is the Saviour of all men, specially of those that believe. . . ."So if its the non redemptive then it cant save. There is no reason to put faith in a non redemptive death of Christ.
You need to define called.I am of the persuasion that the redemption is provided for all that are called. But only secures redemption for those who believe and so are the chosen, Matthew 22:14.
No. Either a word means what it means or it don't. In this case, those called for whom Christ died. Matthew 22:14. Which doesn't fit Calvinist error of limited atonement.You need to define called.
So then you believe what a person does " put faith in" is what makes the death of Christ redemptive, thats salvation by works, by what a person does.Non-redemptive to those who do not put their faith in Christ. 1 Timothy 4:10, ". . . we trust in the living God, who is the Saviour of all men, specially of those that believe. . . ."
I am of the persuasion that the redemption is provided for all that are called. But only secures redemption for those who believe and so are the chosen, Matthew 22:14.
That is what you believe, not what I believe.So then you believe what a person does " put faith in" is what makes the death of Christ redemptive, thats salvation by works, by what a person does.
Belief being a requirement does not make it a cause or a work. Romans 4;5, ". . . to him that worketh not, but believeth on him that justifieth the ungodly . . . ."Christ did not die to make sinners savable if they would meet certain conditions. That would be salvation by works, not grace.
He did not die for all sinners without exception so as to make their salvation conditioned upon their believing. He died to save His people from their sins Matt 1:21 and thereby, warranting that they would believe and repent.
Believe what? Follow Christ is a work.I don't tell ANYONE Christ paid for their sins. I call for them to repent and believe, and follow Christ.
Per what verse, and what is being read into said verse?Except none of those verses speak of such a redemption. You are reading that into the verses.
I don't tell ANYONE Christ paid for their sins.
You admitted it, that is salvation by works, conditioned on man.That is what you believe, not what I believe.
A person believes because Christ's death is redemptive. Because belief is a condtion of accepting God's gift does not make belief the cause of the gift.
You still conditioning salvation on works, a requirement.Belief being a requirement does not make it a cause or a work. Romans 4;5, ". . . to him that worketh not, but believeth on him that justifieth the ungodly . . . ."
Which is why I said you need to define called.No. Either a word means what it means or it don't. In this case, those called for whom Christ died. Matthew 22:14. Which doesn't fit Calvinist error of limited atonement.