1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Featured New King James Version (NKJV)

Discussion in 'Bible Versions & Translations' started by alexander284, Feb 20, 2022.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. alexander284

    alexander284 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2005
    Messages:
    1,510
    Likes Received:
    338
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I'd simply like to know what your thoughts are regarding the NKJV (e.g. strengths, weaknesses).
     
  2. Reformed1689

    Reformed1689 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2019
    Messages:
    9,905
    Likes Received:
    1,820
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Good translation, but does not use best manuscripts.
     
  3. Conan

    Conan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2019
    Messages:
    2,062
    Likes Received:
    334
    Faith:
    Baptist
    But it does in theory. Its Text is the Textus Receptus. The footnotes have the two other Texts, Nestle/Aland and the Majority Text. So if a reading in the Text is not correct the footnotes will have the correct Text. So in one edition you get the Text of 3 editions. All Bibles should use extensive textual notes.
     
    • Like Like x 2
    • Useful Useful x 1
  4. 37818

    37818 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2018
    Messages:
    17,825
    Likes Received:
    1,363
    Faith:
    Baptist
    The NKJV has yet some issues. Still has a few mistakes against what it intended to do. That asided, it provides a modern KJV with footnotes of important textual variants in the New Testament Greek text in English. M <Majority Text>and NU <Nestle-Aland and United Bible Society> footnotes <mostly complete>.
     
  5. Martin Marprelate

    Martin Marprelate Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2010
    Messages:
    8,909
    Likes Received:
    2,128
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I use it for all my private devotions and study.
    It is not perfect - I am aware of some mistakes - but I think it is the best translation out there. To my mind it does use the best manuscripts.
    Three other reasons I like it:
    1. It italicizes words added to help the sense.
    2. I can use it with a KJV Concordance like Young's and when I am reading older authors who use the KJV..
    3. It gives Majority Text and Critical Text readings which I find helpful.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  6. robycop3

    robycop3 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2000
    Messages:
    14,396
    Likes Received:
    672
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Strengths:
    It's in OUR English.
    Does not have most of the old KJV's goofs, such as "Easter" in Acts 12:4.

    Weaknesses:
    Has a few goofs of its own, such as "difficult" insteada "narrow" In Matt. 7:14 (The way to salvation is narrow, not difficult.)

    Summary: IMO, one of, if not the best modern English translation out there. Is a quantum leap aheada the old translations of 400-500 years ago.

    Let us keep in mind that all Bible translations are the products of God's perfect word being handled by imperfect men.
     
  7. Reformed1689

    Reformed1689 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2019
    Messages:
    9,905
    Likes Received:
    1,820
    Faith:
    Baptist
    That is debatable as to whether that is a goof.
     
  8. alexander284

    alexander284 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2005
    Messages:
    1,510
    Likes Received:
    338
    Faith:
    Baptist
    The only copy of the NKJV Bible I have on hand happens to be a pew Bible.

    It sounds as though I should purchase a copy of a NKJV Reference Bible, based on the comments I've been reading here.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
  9. JesusFan

    JesusFan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2011
    Messages:
    8,916
    Likes Received:
    241
    Very good for serious studies, as a formal based translation, and like that it also gives the MT/CT variants renderings in marginal notes
     
    • Like Like x 1
  10. JesusFan

    JesusFan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2011
    Messages:
    8,916
    Likes Received:
    241
    does include the CT/MT variants readings, which is a plus!
     
    • Like Like x 1
  11. JesusFan

    JesusFan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2011
    Messages:
    8,916
    Likes Received:
    241
    Yes, as that is a great feature of the nkjv!
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  12. JesusFan

    JesusFan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2011
    Messages:
    8,916
    Likes Received:
    241
    Yes, pick up a study/reference bible in it
     
    • Like Like x 1
  13. Reformed1689

    Reformed1689 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2019
    Messages:
    9,905
    Likes Received:
    1,820
    Faith:
    Baptist
    The same can be said for things like the ESV, contains alternate readings. I don't really base footnotes on my evaluation of a translation.
     
  14. Eternally Grateful

    Eternally Grateful Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2022
    Messages:
    726
    Likes Received:
    84
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I use the NKJV Scofield Study bible as my main bible. And have for the last 40 years. I will probably use it until I die.

    I has its own flaws. All english bibles do. But I have used it for so long, the other bibles sound weird to me..lol
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
  15. JesusFan

    JesusFan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2011
    Messages:
    8,916
    Likes Received:
    241
    I had the 1967 Old scofield bile, which was the Kjv, but replaced archaic words with modern ones, and moved those older archiac ones to the margins!
     
    • Like Like x 2
  16. Dr. Bob

    Dr. Bob Administrator
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2000
    Messages:
    30,389
    Likes Received:
    551
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Can only say "amen" to these comments. It keeps much of the beauty/lilt of language as the AV1611 but changes enough to be easily read in 2022. I used it extensively for many years and still have family devotions from it as my wife loves the old AV and I use the ESV. Good compromise.

    (Compromise is not always a bad thing, you know. Especially after 50+ years of marriage :) )
     
    • Like Like x 2
  17. JesusFan

    JesusFan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2011
    Messages:
    8,916
    Likes Received:
    241
    I was surprised on just how much the esv read like the Kjv!
     
  18. Dr. Bob

    Dr. Bob Administrator
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2000
    Messages:
    30,389
    Likes Received:
    551
    Faith:
    Baptist
    The ESV is a revision of the KJV/RSV tradition (about 8% the same according to Wayne Grudem, head translator). So, some of the flow is the same.

    But main reading, without any footnotes, is from the better Greek texts so not having to search for original words like the NKJV that puts that as notes in some editions. Hence my preference for ESV. I follow the NAA (Nestle/Aland/Aland) Greek manuscript compilation, not Stephanos or later TR, so it makes sense to use a modern English translation based on those texts.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Useful Useful x 1
  19. Eternally Grateful

    Eternally Grateful Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2022
    Messages:
    726
    Likes Received:
    84
    Faith:
    Baptist
    bet that was nice!
     
  20. JesusFan

    JesusFan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2011
    Messages:
    8,916
    Likes Received:
    241
    Was, it fell apart, and do not think even published any more!
     
    • Like Like x 1
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Loading...