"God's Pure Word"

[Truther]

But you could have succeeded where Jesus failed, right? Six months, and you'd have had them all fixed up in evangelism, discipling, Christology, eschatology, and all the rest. The Bible is so simple, right?

The OP is asking us to go here and continue this discussion....

What is the name of the son per Matt 28:19?

Yes, the Bible is simple.

Others have given us the 66 books and put them in order for us to teach properly. It's all about systematically teaching it.

 

[Reformed1689]

I went through a 10 week course on picture charts(one hour each), in 1979 and was teaching the entire Bible with those 10 lessons within 6 months.

I still teach it.

I gave this thread an example on my Youtube channel and they deleted it.

The Bible is easy peasy to teach and understand with the right technique.

I teach teachers how to teach it.

Ahhh so you became an expert in the scriptures from 10 weeks of picture charts? 10 hours total? Right... Got it.... Absurd.

 

[Reformed1689]

The OP is asking us to go here and continue this discussion....

What is the name of the son per Matt 28:19?

Yes, the Bible is simple.

Others have given us the 66 books and put them in order for us to teach properly. It's all about systematically teaching it.

Just curious, is the Apocrypha the Pure Word of God?

 

[Truther]

Ahhh so you became an expert in the scriptures from 10 weeks of picture charts? 10 hours total? Right... Got it.... Absurd.

No, I fully comprehended the Bible from cover to cover in 1979. I was teaching it in 1980.

4 lessons in the OT and 6 lessons in the NT.

Awesome.

No seminary needed.

 

[Truther]

Just curious, is the Apocrypha the Pure Word of God?

I trow not.

 

[Reformed1689]

No, I fully comprehended the Bible from cover to cover in 1979. I was teaching it in 1980.

4 lessons in the OT and 6 lessons in the NT.

Awesome.

No seminary needed.

Wow, what arrogance? I GUARANTEE you do not fully understand the Bible from Cover to Cover. GUARANTEE it. We are ALWAYS learning. We are not perfect here. The arrogance of your position is ASTOUNDING.

 

[Reformed1689]

I trow not.

So why is it (the Apocrypha) part of the KJV?

 

[Truther]

Wow, what arrogance? I GUARANTEE you do not fully understand the Bible from Cover to Cover. GUARANTEE it. We are ALWAYS learning. We are not perfect here. The arrogance of your position is ASTOUNDING.

I teach it from cover to cover in 10, 1 hour lessons.
I could take longer but I have alot of souls to teach.

It is very easy to teach and comprehend with just a little effort.

 

[Truther]

So why is it (the Apocrypha) part of the KJV?

King James was not sure what to do with it, so left it there to be safe. It was discarded later on.

 

[Reformed1689]

I teach it from cover to cover in 10, 1 hour lessons.
I could take longer but I have alot of souls to teach.

It is very easy to teach and comprehend with just a little effort.

You must leave a LOT out seeing as how you can't even read the Bible in anywhere NEAR 10 hours.

 

[Reformed1689]

King James was not sure what to do with it, so left it there to be safe. It was discarded later on.

But the "perfect" KJV translators also left it in. Why? Guess the KJV wasn't so PERFECT afterall.

 

[Truther]

You must leave a LOT out seeing as how you can't even read the Bible in anywhere NEAR 10 hours.

Of course.
I get to the main points and follow the bloodline.

That is what it is all about.

 

[Truther]

But the "perfect" KJV translators also left it in. Why? Guess the KJV wasn't so PERFECT afterall.

God had it removed to perfect the KJV later on.

 

[Reformed1689]

Of course.
I get to the main points and follow the bloodline.

That is what it is all about.

Follow the bloodline?

 

[Reformed1689]

God had it removed to perfect the KJV later on.

Do you know how idiotic you sound? Not to mention contradictory. So it was imperfect, now it is perfect? But you claim it was never changed even though it was, somehow modern translations "counter" the KJV, though you give no evidence, oh brother.

 

[Truther]

Follow the bloodline?

Yes, exactly.

The Bible is about Jesus from the start to the finish.

 

[Truther]

Do you know how idiotic you sound? Not to mention contradictory. So it was imperfect, now it is perfect? But you claim it was never changed even though it was, somehow modern translations "counter" the KJV, though you give no evidence, oh brother.

Now, if the Apocrypha was laced throughout the KJV and not segregated as a "work", it would have been trouble. Easy in, easy out.

 

[Reformed1689]

Yes, exactly.

The Bible is about Jesus from the start to the finish.

So you teach about grace, sanctification, glorification, anthropology, soteriology, bibliology, hamartiology, ecclesiology, eschatology, and all of that in 10 one hour sessions?

 

[Logos1560]

I fully comprehended the Bible from cover to cover in 1979. I was teaching it in 1980.

4 lessons in the OT and 6 lessons in the NT.

Your arrogance or pride is contrary to what the Scriptures teach concerning sound believers.

 

[Salty]

God had it removed to perfect the KJV later on.

So the 1611 is NOT The Pure Word of God?

I teach it from cover to cover in 10, 1 hour lessons.
I could take longer but I have alot of souls to teach.

It is very easy to teach and comprehend with just a little effort.

for more on this course: That 10 hour course