Part of President Trump's platform for 2024

I want to point out what I see as the major problem with Trump’s statement…

He stated the PURPOSE of the action he proposed was to declare himself the winner of 2020….. or…. Have a new election (a do over) for 2020. There is no constitutional path for either of those things to happen.

Had he stated the PURPOSE of his recommendation was to protect the integrity of federal elections or prevent fraud in future elections or to insure citizens don’t have their votes cancelled by fraud… anything other than focusing on himself and 2020, I could have supported a conversation on the issue.

As is, it’s was a catastrophic mistake which I doubt he can recover from.

peace to you

 

Yes, but that disagreement is based on an imagined future event that would not have happened (since he would have won the election) compared to what is actually happening.

And what is actually happening is that the Dems regularly bypass, ignore, undermine, and badmouth the Constitution, and talk of abolishing it altogether.

There is no comparison. The Dems are the greater evil by several magnitudes, and very, very powerful.

(But I realize that choosing the lesser of two evils is not exactly in your working vocabulary, so why should recognizing which is which be any easier for you. )

 

I’ve lost count of the times Trump worded something poorly, or spoke when he should have let others do the talking.

Yet he was doing a better job as president than anyone for quite some time, until he was deposed by his enemies via a massive election fraud apparatus.

 

The list in the OP is a huge reference to the 2020 Dem election fraud apparatus.

The list just happens to be steps that need to be taken now rather than wait for a new Rep presidency that may never come if they aren't.

 

Well, with a slim repub majority in the house and dem control of Senate and POTUS, there is no chance to pass these proposals into law.

All the more reason to find a candidate that will unite the repubs and have broad appeal in the country.

peace to you

 

Our resident leftist conservatives fall into this category, their knives are out. I was listening to the can’t be replaced Rush Limbaugh’s time slot-Jimmy Failla the other day. Had to turn him off. Uniparty guy who pretends to be conservative. Flashy, sometimes funny, but for sale. My opinion.

Uniparty


David Rockefeller, a prominent 20th-century globalist and "uniparty" representative
See also: Establishment
The "Uniparty" is a term that describes the globalistestablishment's control over politics and policy to the extent that every or nearly every major political party or politician are controlled by them and, thus, have far more in common than different, policy-wise. It is essentially synonymous with the deep state, as it retains control almost regardless of which political party or politician is elected.

An example is the general movement by both the Republican and Democratic parties in the United States to continually expand the size and reach of the Federal government into every area of one's life, the only significant difference being whether the apparatus should be run by unionized government employees (the Democrat party approach) or private-sector contractors (the Republican party approach).

The uniparty should not be confused with bipartisanship, as the latter views working together as a means to an end, while the uniparty sees different political parties working together as the end in-and-of itself.

Contents
[hide]

• 1 Different parties, same policies
• 2 Uniparty influence
• 3 Notable figures not part of the uniparty
• 4 See also
• 5 External Links
• 6 References

Different parties, same policies
Critics of the establishment frequently use the term "uniparty" because the policies of establishment members of various political parties support and advance the same globalist and socialist policies.[1] For example, after the New Deal, many liberal Republicans supported FDR's big government programs and helped preserve them, earning them the nickname of "me too" Republicans.[2][3] This "me too" attitude became prominent again during Barack Obama's candidacy and presidency, when many token conservatives voiced support for his left-wing policies,[4] and when the GOP establishment attempted to adopt the same policies as the Democrats on issues related to immigration and minorities.[5] The uniparty consistently advocates for a net increase in federal spending without any effort to reduce unnecessary social or defense spending,[6] and both parties have a record of supporting gun control.[7] Marxist ideas have "infiltrated" both the Democrat and Republican parties.[8]

During the 2012 U.S. presidential election, conservatives noted that Democrat Barack Obama and Republican Mitt Romney shared many of the same core values and policies.[9][10] Another example of the uniparty in action is the "grand coalition" governments in several European countries, such as Germany, the Netherlands, and Austria. While the traditional mainstream conservative and liberal parties joined together to govern, they agreed on many agenda items, particularly in advancing big government globalist policies.

The same critics also point out the GOP establishment's readiness to compromise and back down from their stated positions as an example of the uniparty.[11][12] Many neoconservatives and libertarians support the leftist push for abolishing national identity and the nation-state.[13] Republicans have joined Democrats in advancing and protecting open borders policies.[14]


In 1961, Edith Kermit Roosevelt, the granddaughter of President Theodore Roosevelt, wrote what she considered the definition of the establishment to be:

“ The word “Establishment” is a general term for the power elite in international finance, business, the professions and government, largely from the northeast, who wield most of the power regardless of who is in the White House. Most people are unaware of this “legitimate Mafia.” Yet the power of the Establishment makes itself felt from the professor who seeks a foundation grant, to the candidate for a cabinet post or State Department job. It affects the nation’s policies in almost every area….
What is the Establishment’s viewpoint? Through the [past four] administrations, its ideology is constant. That the best way to fight Communism is by a One World Socialist state governed by “experts” like themselves. The result has been policies which favor the growth of the superstate....[15]


Uniparty influence
Critics of the establishment assert that the uniparty establishment asserts control over every or most major political parties and political figures. The numerous non-governmental organizations that leaders from both parties support, and vice-versa, serve as evidence for this claim. For example, U.S. Presidents of both political parties chose to fill their administrations with members of globalist organizations such as the Council on Foreign Relations and the Trilateral Commission. Additionally, prominent figures from both political parties tend to be members of the Bilderberg group and the Bohemian Grove.

U.S. Col Douglas MacGregor, a critic of the globalist and Uniparty war on Russia said, "Russia to them [the Uniparty and globalists] represents the last major European state that is not part of the globalist internationalist empire, if you will. They've [Russia] resisted LGBTQ, they've resisted what I would call this interesting blend of nihilism, Marxism, atheism, and as a result, they [Russia] have to be subverted and overthrown."[

 

That seems to miss the gist of the comment. A candidate with broad appeal was defeated last time even with record votes cast, and by a senile opponent with a silly running mate.

Unless the 2020 massive election fraud apparatus is seriously dealt with, hoping for a Rep win again looks like wishful thinking.

 

The expression “guy who pretends to be conservative” seems to clarify that. It’s your real “wolf in sheep’s clothing” Rep, aka a RINO.

 

A usual twist to fit response from you. I said “OUR RESIDENT LEFTIST CONSERVATIVES”, i.e. the Baptist Board.