Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
I have always been of a mind to be convinced from scripture my beliefs are in error. So, yes, truth really does matter to me.Generally we as Christians hold some certain beliefs, when questioned or opposed we dig in and cannot here the other view.
Generally we as Christians hold some certain beliefs, when questioned or opposed we dig in and cannot *here the other view.
There are many issues.I suspect we agree on much more than not. We just don’t debate unless we disagree.
peace to you
I have always been of a mind to be convinced from scripture my beliefs are in error. So, yes, truth really does matter to me.
Truth exists apart from me and apart from you. My beliefs may be wrong or your beliefs may be wrong. Additionally, we cannot both be correct but we can both be wrong.
peace to you
The Lord’s supper was initially a fellowship meal of believers to proclaim the death of Christ, reminding them of His sacrifice. Paul warns that if taken in an unworthy manner it could lead to sickness and death.But often it comes down to our interpenetration of Scripture
For example - Communion - Is closed communion the proper scriptural way or is open communion.
I don’t think I’d reduce God to 1 + 1 = 2. There is more to consider.There are many issues.
What is your understanding of God being a self evident truth? Like the concept of 1 + 1;= 2?
The Lord’s supper was initially a fellowship meal of believers to proclaim the death of Christ, reminding them of His sacrifice. Paul warns that if taken in an unworthy manner it could lead to sickness and death.
I would allow any who desired to fellowship with us through the supper to do so, but always admonished everyone that examine themselves beforehand, to seek forgiveness from God and to be focused upon our Lord.
I do hope that pleased God, as that was my intent.
Oops, can’t help myself.Not trying to make my comment about any doctrine - including communion
Only using that as an example.
The OP asks us if we are willing to look at the other side of an issue/doctrine
I find most of the time we aren’t debating what others believe, but a caricature of what they believe or of what we believe.
I remember a few years back someone started posting on BB that John MacArthur was teaching a works based salvation. Of course, JMac explicitly states what he believes (Lordship Salvation) is not a works based merited salvation.
So we spend all our time saying “you believe works based salvation” “No I don’t” “yes you do” no I don’t” yes you do”, instead of actually debating what Lordship Salvation really means.
We are currently having similar discussions about whether “faith” is a work.
So are you saying 1 + 1 equaling 2 does not need God to be true? In which case, there never needs to be any kind of god, let alone God. Whom we who are genuine Christians should know. John 17:3.I don’t think I’d reduce God to 1 + 1 = 2. There is more to consider.
Ever read the first discussion board?The fact is that most are here to be heard, not to listen.
*hear
I agree.I suspect we agree on much more than not. We just don’t debate unless we disagree.
peace to you
Matthew 7:21-23, ". . . Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven. Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works? And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity. . . .". . . John MacArthur . . . Lordship Salvation . . . .
…
And the most helpful thing I have discovered is that most people's opinions are much more affected by the group that they perceive as being important to be member in good standing of than any real evaluation of the truth of the positions.
Man. That's true. I thought the world of JMac and his writings on Lordship Salvation had a big part in convincing me that there was something to this Calvinism stuff. I was blown away when I read a book on God's sovereignty written by top Calvinist academics of today that completely dismissed JMac's views.
I also have actually read a lot of Puritans and what they said was not even close to what the internet Calvinist warriors are saying. And if you really want a shocker, read Augustine himself. I'm not saying he's Catholic. But he wouldn't last a second in most Reformed churches today either.
Also, I have found that there is more diverse opinion among Calvinists than between a lot of moderate Calvinists and regular Baptists.
And the most helpful thing I have discovered is that most people's opinions are much more affected by the group that they perceive as being important to be member in good standing of than any real evaluation of the truth of the positions.
Ahh, that’s changing with the Woke “Idiot” culture.There are many issues.
What is your understanding of God being a self evident truth? Like the concept of 1 + 1;= 2?
