That is what I seemed to read somewhere, but I don't know, besides I am not sure most things break it down by Baptist and non-baptist. Where does your source get his information about Baptists. If Spurgeon, a baptist preacher, believed it was historical as he is the one that talked about Elliot's work as being the standard on the subject, how would most baptists believe something different, does not saying it is the standard mean that it is the generally accepted interpretation?
I think maybe it seems your source is from a hundred years prior. So that is interesting. I tried looking through a work that made Elliot's work shorter, and there were some very coincidental things if it wasn't historical, but at the same time, I am not sure that everything matched up perfectly.
- ELLIOTT (C. B., A.M. Died 1875). Horae Apoc-alypticae; or, a Commentary on the Apocalypse, critical and historical. 4 vols. 8va., Lond., Seeleys. 1862. S. iS/-The standard work an the subject.
I wonder if it wasn't historical, as well as referring to more specific future events, but since it doesn't really affect how I live my daily life outside of needing to be ready, I have not been devoting a huge amount of time to it.
Elliott's work is available on Google books