Having Reasonable discussions on this issue
It is an interpretive error to try and pull out of the tribulation period minor sections, divorced from the greater context, in order to create a gotchya argument based on one’s favorite proof text. Further, just because one might disagree with an argument and in their mind does not provide proof to make them wrong, does not mean there is no evidence for the position in which they disagree with. Sophomoric attempts to create such an atmosphere will be ignored and in doing so is not an inability to defend a position. In fact, making such an argument is akin to leveling a false accusation and or being a false witness. We need to have reasonable conversations not gotchya debates.
It is an interpretive error to try and pull out of the tribulation period minor sections, divorced from the greater context, in order to create a gotchya argument based on one’s favorite proof text. Further, just because one might disagree with an argument and in their mind does not provide proof to make them wrong, does not mean there is no evidence for the position in which they disagree with. Sophomoric attempts to create such an atmosphere will be ignored and in doing so is not an inability to defend a position. In fact, making such an argument is akin to leveling a false accusation and or being a false witness. We need to have reasonable conversations not gotchya debates.