Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Stay tuned for more in this series.
PART 2: Should every Christian be a Republican?
PART 3: Should every Christian be a Fundamentalist?
PART 4: Should every Christian be a Calvinist?
PART 5: Should every Christian be a vegetarian?
PART 6: Should every Christian be a __________?
(be creative - fill in the blank)
Part 6:
Should every Christian be fully committed to stating Truth?
Should every Christian love and cherish his or her fellow siblings in Christ?
Should every Christian be a bible student, rightly dividing the word of truth?
Should believers offer gratutious insults like petulant pipsqueaks.more childish nonsense!!!
The Bible does not teach or even support Young Earth Creationism.
I’m more concerned about where I’m going—the future, not the past. I’ll learn the prehistory details in Heaven.
“We are living in a time when many Christians…”We are living in a time when many Christians are even deceived by the so called "science" of sinful, fallen, fallible humans, who suppose that they know more than the God of the Bible. There are many who are supposedly "Evangelical Orthodox Christians", who also accept that God did not Create the Universe as described in Genesis 1:1, literally, but some how "used" an "evolutionary" process to do so. These Christians are trying to harmonize what the Bible Teaches on Creatio ex nihilo, with human "science", which mainly reject the Creation Account in Genesis 1, and elsewhere in the Bible.
With certainty, you know very little about those you speak so vehemently about. Your distain of “science” and those who work with it to advance knowledge is wearisome
radiometric dating
I have a flawed tool at home. I just can’t get it to drive a nail in straight.I like FACTS and NOT FAIRY TALES!!!
Just look at the "sciences" that is used for dating the age of the earth. I will give just three
1. radiometric dating, which is FLAWED!
2. carbon 14 dating, which is FLAWED!
2. uranium dating, which is also FLAWED!
then we have;
4. methods used to measure the speed of light, are also FLAWED!
I can go on and on and on...