Confession for Baptist’s and Protestants in general

[Cathode]

Moses was a man of God and Korah received just reward.

ON the other hand, the Pope was a blasphemer and the German drunkard found grace in the eyes of the Lord.

You’re rolling with the holy virtueless drunkard idea?

Luther: “We are all priests, as many of us as are Christians”

Korah: “ You have gone too far! The whole community is holy, every one of them, and the Lord is with them. “

Luther: “This teaching of the supremacy of the pope shows forcefully that the Pope is the very Antichrist, who has exalted himself above, and opposed himself against Christ “

Korah : “Why then do you set yourselves above the Lord’s assembly?”

Luther: “He is, say they, the lord of the world!”

Dathan: “ And now you also want to lord it over us!”

 

[Cathode]

The New Covenant protestors have the same voice and complaint as the Old Covenant grumblers.

 

[canadyjd]

My point is that Jesus established the Apostolic Thrones of Judgement, the Apostles judge in their episcopal successors.

Confession is where this is demonstrated.

Just nonsense…..

You are in continuous error because you don’t understand scripture (nor do you desire to do so) and you are thoroughly deceived by man made RCC propaganda.

Jesus told His 12 Jewish disciples they would sit upon thrones to judge the 12 tribes of Israel…. Not Gentiles. Not their “successors”

Just another pile of made up Catholic cowpie to control the masses.

Peace to you

 

[canadyjd]

Ok, Cathode, I get it, you're not going to tell me how many Bishops are successors to the original apostles.

I guess that would be damaging evidence to a coverup.

The truth is there have been consistent disputes throughout RCC history, including a time when 3 men claimed to the “Pope” at the same time and once when a woman was named “Pope”.

Of course, the RCC denies these records and claims only one “true” Pope existed at any given time and preserved the apostolic succession.

So, once you kill all your competitors, you get to write the “true” story of what happened.

The RCC has a continuous history of murder, child abuse and mutilation, abuse of power since its creation in the 4th century.

They have been attempting to rewrite Christian history ever since to support their man made rules to control the masses.

Some continue to drink the RCC cool-aid and can never be convince to reject the propaganda unless God Holy Spirit Himself intervenes.

Peace to you

 

[Ben1445]

The New Covenant protestors have the same voice and complaint as the Old Covenant grumblers.

Which explains why the new covenant followers are constantly being swallowed up by the earth?
Have you read Hebrews?
We can all enter the holiest place because it was made accessible to us.

 

[Marooncat79]

You took the new gospel the Apostles warned about, Luther is the someone preaching the different gospel.

This isn’t anything new, this Protestant rebellion in the New Covenant had its counterpart in the Old Covenant.

Korah had the same animus and even words against Moses that Luther had against the Pope.
Both used God’s word to rebel against God’s chosen Authority.

It didn’t end well for Korah.

Well, in Romans 5:1, Paul says that we have been justified by Faith (alone is implied when reading his other writings), and the result is peace w God. So, I will stand on that instead of the RCC position on justification.

Btw, justification means being declared right w God

 

[canadyjd]

Although I totally reject papal authority, why is it so important that Peter be the 1st pope in Rome? What was so special about Rome at that time other than population?

Couldn’t he have been pope in Jerusalem where Christianity came to fruition? Is not God Lord over all?

Because the Bishop of Rome, the Pontiff Maximus, (literally a pagan title meaning high priest of all religions) or “Pope” declared himself to be the great high priest that speaks for God Himself…. After he forged a will from Emperor Constantine giving him control of the Roman army in the 4th century.

Having the power of the great Roman army to enforce his seizure of power, he eliminated any who opposed him and began rewriting Christian history to support his claims.

Part of his propaganda was to declare Peter to be the first Bishop of Rome and that he was a direct descendent in this line of succession, based on a misreading of Matthew where Jesus declared “upon this rock I will build my church”

So, to answer your question “why Rome?”, it’s because that is part of over 1600 years of elaborate RCC propaganda designed to shut down debate, marginalize any who dispute the claims, and control the masses.

Peace to you

 

[Cathode]

Because the Bishop of Rome, the Pontiff Maximus, (literally a pagan title meaning high priest of all religions) or “Pope” declared himself to be the great high priest that speaks for God Himself…. After he forged a will from Emperor Constantine giving him control of the Roman army in the 4th century.

Having the power of the great Roman army to enforce his seizure of power, he eliminated any who opposed him and began rewriting Christian history to support his claims.

Part of his propaganda was to declare Peter to be the first Bishop of Rome and that he was a direct descendent in this line of succession, based on a misreading of Matthew where Jesus declared “upon this rock I will build my church”

So, to answer your question “why Rome?”, it’s because that is part of over 1600 years of elaborate RCC propaganda designed to shut down debate, marginalize any who dispute the claims, and control the masses.

Peace to you

Right, so you have to resort to a giant conspiracy theory without any supporting facts, to explain why all the Early Christians were so Catholic in their interpretation of Scripture and all their doctrines were Catholic.

I’ve heard some off the wall unreasonable arguments in my time.

When you can’t admit one single fact presented to you, you might want to consider your position unreasonable.

 

[Cathode]

Which explains why the new covenant followers are constantly being swallowed up by the earth?
Have you read Hebrews?
We can all enter the holiest place because it was made accessible to us.

The earth has given way under Protestantism since it’s inception, it has cascaded into every conflicting interpretation and doctrine of error.

You should read Peter first about Paul’s writings, heed his warning.

 

[Cathode]

Well, in Romans 5:1, Paul says that we have been justified by Faith (alone is implied when reading his other writings), and the result is peace w God. So, I will stand on that instead of the RCC position on justification.

Btw, justification means being declared right w God

Faith alone yes, unless you define faith as mere intellectual assent, then no.

 

[Charlie24]

You’re rolling with the holy virtueless drunkard idea?

Luther: “We are all priests, as many of us as are Christians”

Korah: “ You have gone too far! The whole community is holy, every one of them, and the Lord is with them. “

Luther: “This teaching of the supremacy of the pope shows forcefully that the Pope is the very Antichrist, who has exalted himself above, and opposed himself against Christ “

Korah : “Why then do you set yourselves above the Lord’s assembly?”

Luther: “He is, say they, the lord of the world!”

Dathan: “ And now you also want to lord it over us!”

Go light some candles and worship some idols, Cathode.

 

[Cathode]

Although I totally reject papal authority, why is it so important that Peter be the 1st pope in Rome? What was so special about Rome at that time other than population?

Couldn’t he have been pope in Jerusalem where Christianity came to fruition? Is not God Lord over all?

The thing about Rome is that all roads led to it, and consequently all roads led from it.
It was the heart of the civilised world as they knew it, to convert there meant to convert everywhere. Which is what finally happened.

Apostles Peter and Paul went straight for the heart of the beast.

“We read the lives of the Caesars: At Rome Nero was the first who stained with blood the rising blood. Then is Peter girt by another (an allusion to John 21:18), when he is made fast to the cross.” Tertullian, Scorpiace, 15:3 (A.D. 212).

“Peter…at last, having come to Rome, he was crucified head-downwards; for he had requested that he might suffer this way.” Origen, Third Commentary on Genesis, (A.D. 232).

“Thus Peter, the first of the Apostles, having been often apprehended, and thrown into prison, and treated with igominy, was last of all crucified at Rome.” Peter of Alexandria, The Canonical Epistle, Canon 9 (A.D. 306).

“Which Peter and Paul preached at Rome…” Lactantius, The Divine Institutes, 4:21 (A.D. 310).

“This man Simon Magus, after he had been cast out by the Apostles, came to Rome…Peter and Paul, a noble pair, chief rulers of the Church, arrived and set the error right…For Peter was there, who carrieth the keys of heaven…” Cyril of Jerusalem, Catechetical Lectures ,6:14-15 (c. A.D. 350).

 

[canadyjd]

Right,…..

Thank you.

Do you deny the Bishop of Rome claimed Emperor Constantine left him in charge of the Roman army in a will?

Do you deny the Bishop of Rome used the army to crush all who opposed him?

Do you deny the pagan origin of the title “Ponticus Maximus”, meaning the high priest of all religions which your Pope took for himself?

You remain in serious error because you do not understand scripture and are ignorant of Christian history.

You simply regurgitate RCC propaganda that has poisoned your ability to think critically.

Thank God truly spiritual men like Knox and Luther that saw through the lies, left the RCC and sought a relationship with God rather than a relationship with the man made institution that is the RCC led by a false high priest.

Peace to you

 

[Cathode]

Go light some candles and worship some idols, Cathode.

Go set up a revival tent and handle some taipans.

C’mon mate, do you have to resort to puerile insults.

You are better than this.

 

[Charlie24]

Go set up a revival tent and handle some taipans.

C’mon mate, do you have to resort to puerile insults.

You are better than this.

What do you call this? I'm sure you have a respectable name for it.

 

[Cathode]

Thank you.

Do you deny the Bishop of Rome claimed Emperor Constantine left him in charge of the Roman army in a will?

Do you deny the Bishop of Rome used the army to crush all who opposed him?

“The rising pestilence was first cut short by Rome, the see of Peter, which having become the head to the world of the pastoral office, holds by religion not by arms.” Prosper of Aquitaine, Song on the Enemies of Grace, 1 (A.D. 429).

 

[Charlie24]

What do you call this? I'm sure you have a respectable name for it.

View attachment 10756

Candle lighting around statues and such is a pagan act worshipping pagan Gods.

 

[Cathode]

Candle lighting around statues and such is a pagan act worshipping pagan Gods.

Then the Israelites must have been pagans.

 

[Charlie24]

Then the Israelites must have been pagans.

More proof the RCC can't pull themselves out of their ceremonies from the Old Covenant.

 

[Charlie24]

More proof the RCC can't pull themselves out of their ceremonies from the Old Covenant.

I'm sure you know the RCC is a Gentile Church, but did you know those ceremonies in the Old Covenant were never given to the Gentiles.

That's just on of the many things that's blasphemous in the RCC.