Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
That would depend on whether God want's robots or free will agents to love and worship Him.
Hello Brother Charlie, thank you for your response.
If it’s God’s desire is to save everyone, could He save those who freely choose to reject Him anyway to fulfill His desire, or is He choosing not to exercise that power?
Hebrews 7:25
There is not salvation offered any other way. If people freely choose to disregard God, is God impotent because we choose the curse? Far from it. He is their Judge and will be magnified over them anyway.
Greetings to you Layman. Hope and peace to you and yours. I am on a little vacation so don’t have much time at the moment to respond to things. I have only read your OP and no other posts in this thread.
Again, the issue is not whether any poster's speculation answers the question, but what does God's word say.
Based upon their actions and choices yes.So would you say that He wants to save everyone, but if they won’t obey and He has no other choice, He set aside His mercy and will inflict wrath instead?
Can we assume that God intended to save all lost sinners by the Cross of Christ, or did He intended to save those whom Jesus died for in stead of?Hello Brother Charlie, thank you for your response.
If it’s God’s desire to save everyone, couldn’t He save those who freely choose to reject Him anyway, or is He choosing not to exercise that power?
Based upon their actions and choices yes.
Do you think that makes Him weak because He cannot do something?
Isaiah 59 posted before is a great explanation.
Can we assume that God intended to save all lost sinners by the Cross of Christ, or did He intended to save those whom Jesus died for in stead of?
CorrectI would say - He died for those He intended to save.
I have no idea where such nonsense come from. Christ died as a ransom for all, those to be saved and those never to be saved. Thus He provides the means of reconciliation to anyone who hears and understands the gospel, but only those who "receive the reconciliation" are those God intended to save.I would say - He died for those He intended to save.
I would say - He died for those He intended to save.
I'd say "no", as salvation could have been theirs. God "desires that nobody perish but all come to repentance", for He "takes no pleasure in the destruction of the wicked".
Lost sinners have free will remaining to reject, but do they have any to choose Jesus as Lord and Savior?I'd say "no", as salvation could have been theirs. God "desires that nobody perish but all come to repentance", for He "takes no pleasure in the destruction of the wicked".
I'd say it is because of God's nature that salvation has been made avaliable to all men, that He desires all to be saved, and takes no pleasure in the destruction of the wicked. This does not infringe on free-will anymore than the nature of those who reject Him infringes on their own free will.
They can make the choice (it is still free will). They reject because their deeds are evil, their minds are set on the flesh.Lost sinners have free will remaining to reject, but do they have any to choose Jesus as Lord and Savior?
If God does not get what He wants, He is not sovereign.That would depend on whether God want's robots or free will agents to love and worship Him.