Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Consider this verse and the context it is in and tell me what you think.You mean the 70 evangelists Jesus sent out to preach or the 70 elders Moses chose among the Isralites?
I believe Jesus chose 12 Disciples as the structure of 12 tribes in the OT foreshadowed this leadership beginning. Not sure why 12, although I could speculate. 12 has significance, but this may be because God chose 12 tribes (arguing the significance of the number for the number itself is circular reasoning).
Consider this verse and the context it is in and tell me what you think.
Matthew 19:28
And Jesus said unto them, Verily I say unto you, That ye which have followed me, in the regeneration when the Son of man shall sit in the throne of his glory, ye also shall sit upon twelve thrones, judging the twelve tribes of Israel.
(1 implied here is that there will be a regeneration
2) There will be a glorious throne on which Jesus Christ sits
3) He will sit "in" this throne, not "on" it. (see Ezekiel 41 to 48)
4) From there he will judge the 12 tribes of Israel.
5) The pattern for the officials of the kingdom is shown in the days of Moses
I can not always answer the why but I can track the reality of a doctrine. The number 12 is God's number for his perfect government.I agree with your conclusions.
Do you then think that the OT pattern, the 12 tribes, foreshadowed what is to come rather than Christ using the OT pattern?
Also.....why 12?
I guess if God used 14 then we'd ask "why 14?".I can not always answer the why but I can track the reality of a doctrine. The number 12 is God's number for his perfect government.
Matthias was the replacement for Judas.Mt 19:27 Then answered Peter and said unto him, Behold, we have forsaken all, and followed thee; what shall we have therefore?
28 And Jesus said unto them, Verily I say unto you, That ye which have followed me, in the regeneration when the Son of man shall sit in the throne of his glory, ye also (also means in addition to) shall sit upon twelve thrones, judging the twelve tribes of Israel.
29 And every one that hath forsaken houses, or brethren, or sisters, or father, or mother, or wife, or children, or lands, for my name’s sake, shall receive an hundredfold, and shall inherit everlasting life. (in our church age, everlasting life is the gift of God).
So now we know for sure that the kingdom age to come when Jesus Christ is King over Israel and the whole earth that Israel will be governed by Judges after the OT pattern. Twelve tribes and twelve thrones and twelve apostles.
Now, an interesting fact: When Jesus rose from the dead there were only 11 apostles. Judas had fallen. It would be about 42 AD when Jesus chose Barnabas to replace him as the 12th apostle of Israel. This is recorded just before the beginning of the first missionary campaign of Paul in Acts 13, of all chapters. Eleven is always associated with the falling short of the standards of God and the number 13 is associated with transgressors (a word with 13 letters), which gentiles are. Paul was the 13th apostle but he was not of the 12 and he wrote 13 letters to the gentiles. The word "gentiles" is in the 13 NT epistles written by Paul 42 times and the number 42 is together in the scriptures 13 times with the last occurrence being in Re 13:5, if I remember my study correctly. The first time the word gentiles appears in Paul's epistles is in Rom 1:13. One apostle to the gentiles. The word "thirteen" does not appear in the NT. It appears in the OT in 15 verses and there is some wonderful typology associated with it that has a great bearing on the mysteries of the NT days we are living in now as well as the coming kingdom.
Rom 9:30 ¶ What shall we say then? That the Gentiles, which followed not after righteousness, have attained to righteousness, even the righteousness which is of faith.
31 But Israel, which followed after the law of righteousness, hath not attained (they did not attain - they fell short) to the law of righteousness.
32 Wherefore? Because they sought it not by faith, but as it were by the works of the law. For they stumbled at that stumblingstone;
33 As it is written, Behold, I lay in Sion a stumblingstone and rock of offence: and whosoever believeth on him shall not be ashamed.
Falling short is the history of Israel. You will find the number 11 all over the place and that it is connected to Israel's failure to submit themselves to God and his rule over them. It is explained in chapters Rom 7-11 in this age.
These are not coincidences.
Rev. 21:1-4,14What is the regeneration of Mt 19:28? Is it the same as the restitution of all things in the near future?
Matthias was the replacement for Judas.
Paul and Barnabas would be 13 and 14.
I do believe that the choice made in Acts 1 was binding and chosen by God with the lot.
Barnabas went with Paul. If you would say that Paul went to the gentiles, I would say Barnabas as much.
Rev. 21:1-4,14
And I saw a new heaven and a new earth: for the first heaven and the first earth were passed away; and there was no more sea. And I John saw the holy city, new Jerusalem, coming down from God out of heaven, prepared as a bride adorned for her husband. And I heard a great voice out of heaven saying, Behold, the tabernacle of God is with men, and he will dwell with them, and they shall be his people, and God himself shall be with them, and be their God.
14. And the wall of the city had twelve foundations, and in them the names of the twelve apostles of the Lamb.
Isaiah has plenty to say on the subject.
Using Scripture, it is hard to believe that God would have recorded in Acts that the replacement of Judas with Matthias was fulfillment of Scriptural prophecy if it wasn’t.Using logic, it is strange that God would work so hard to send an indwelling teacher of his New Covenant only to resort to an OT expedient. I think the duty assigned to the disciples for those ten days was to wait until he got there and then he would teach them what to do.
The gentiles live everywhere. There are not only Jews in Antioch where they began all through their journey. You are taking teachings out of Scripture that are not there.Barnabas was not allowed to go to Europe with Paul. The gentiles lives there.
So was Paul called an apostle and sent on the same ministry as Barnabas.Besides, God called Barnabas an apostle,
You are making conclusions about information that your view relies on. This is circular reasoning. I’m pretty sure top billing is not a matter of importance. If it was James would know that he would be more important than John because of his listing. He would also know that he didn’t have a hope for the right hand because Peter gets listed first. This is just an example of fabrication of doctrine from irrelevant information. Hopefully the illustration is obvious enough to not have anyone accept it or think that I believe it either. (The record on this hope is not good so far.)and of course since he was a member of the twelve, he should have been mentioned before Paul.
I am interested.There are other reasons for my position.
Acts 14:12-13Acts 14:14 Which when the apostles, Barnabas and Paul, heard of, they rent their clothes, and ran in among the people, crying out,
I don't have a problem with numbers in Scripture. There are very important things that are made clear and are taught with numbers. While there are things relevant to Scripture, in numbers, and they may even establish good doctrine, I don't think the numbers are a place to find doctrine.@Ben1445
Thanks Ben, I can see that you have it figured out.
I will say this one thing that always offends me when you guys call the number structure in God's own book "numerology." But it is not something I desire to discuss with you.