• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Imputed Righteousness is False Doctrine

Van

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
We are made the righteousness of God in Him by the washing of regeneration, by the precious blood of the Lamb.
 

Van

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I have shown not one of the OT saints were made the righteousness of God, until after Christ died. Thus they were never imputed with the Righteousness of God. Their sins were temporarily covered, robed in righteousness, but not removed, because that action required the suffering and death of Christ.

Romans 4:3 teaches Abraham's faith was credited to him as righteousness. Thus God crediting a person's faith as righteousness does NOT result in the person, NOT his or her faith, becoming the Righteousness of God. Otherwise the OT saints would not have had to wait in Abraham's bosom to be made perfect after Christ died on the cross.

Yes, Romans 4:6 says God credits "righteousness" to the OT Saints, resulting in their sins being temporarily covered. But note these verses nor any others say God credits to them the Righteousness of God. Their faith alone was credited as righteousness.

And Romans 4:9, 11 says "faith was credited to Abraham as righteousness. Every born anew believe has had their faith also credited, as we all had a faith "like Abraham's." Romans 4:16 NLT
 

Ben1445

Well-Known Member
I asked a question to answer, did YOU explain how Christ as a "made sinner" was just. Did I say Christ was a made sinner? Nope, That was your position, not mine.





Here is the simple answer to the question you seem incapable of even grasping! Jesus could not have just, if He sacrificed His life as a "made sinner!" Therefore that translation is erroneous nonsense. Jesus, who knew no sin, was treated as sin on our behalf.
I think I understand you but I couldn’t be sure. I can see as I read that you are upset with people who are talking to you. If you continue to ask the same questions and double down on your statement, I will continue to misunderstand your intentions.
You asked someone to explain why they believe X. I wanted you to rephrase X because I still don’t understand what you mean by it when you asked someone to explain why they believe it.

Also could you now explain the grammar behind the sentence in the quote that I have in bold and italics.
I assumed that the reason I misunderstood was grammar initially. Now I have more trouble understanding you because this is another word that you use in a way that I don’t comprehend.

Pretend I’m your five year old grandson and explain it to me in a way that I can understand.
If it is worth explaining, it is worth the time. I am in earnest. I am not making fun.
 

Van

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Ben asks for an explanation a 5 year old can understand. I understand personal incredulity is a fallacious argument.

Here is my guess at the question Ben claims not to understand: "Explain how Christ as a "made sinner was just.?"

Ben says he does not understand the question, perhaps because of the grammar.

Explain asks Ben to tell me how Christ, as a made sinner could be just.

First we start with Christ sacrificing His life, the just (Christ) for the unjust (fallen humanity).

Fallen humanity can not be considered just as we were "made sinners" thus unjust.

Christ can not be considered just if He too was a made sinner.

Therefore no one with a rational mind can explain the false claim Christ was made a sinner, what many mistranslations of 2 Corinthians 5:21 say.

The correct translation would read, God treated Christ as sin on our behalf.
 

Marooncat79

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
What we have here is a non-denial denial...
What they falsely claim is we are made the righteousness of God by imputation and not by the blood of the Lamb.
Note the title of the thread...
Van

Imputation is a declaration by God. It is God Himself who declares us righteous.

This act results from mans response to the Gospel call according to scripture. Its is the Spirit who works in our hearts enabling us to cry out to God for salvation and mercy
 

Van

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Van

Imputation is a declaration by God. It is God Himself who declares us righteous.

This act results from mans response to the Gospel call according to scripture. Its is the Spirit who works in our hearts enabling us to cry out to God for salvation and mercy
You can copy and paste these Calvinist fictions till the cows come home, we are not made the righteousness of God by imputation. We are made the righteousness of God by the blood of Jesus.
 

Marooncat79

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
You can copy and paste these Calvinist fictions till the cows come home, we are not made the righteousness of God by imputation. We are made the righteousness of God by the blood of Jesus.
Van

We are declared to be righteous by God

Righteousness is imputes by faith
 

Van

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Folks, don't listen to people such as Van and their rants against the gospel.

Romans 4:6
Even as David also describeth the blessedness of the man, unto whom God imputeth righteousness without works.

(emphasis mine)
Yet another post of gibberish, avoiding the issue that we did not become the righteousness of God by imputation.
 

Van

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Van

We are declared to be righteous by God

Righteousness is imputes by faith
You can copy and paste these Calvinist fictions till the cows come home, we are not made the righteousness of God by imputation. We are made the righteousness of God by the blood of Jesus.
 

Van

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I do not believe any of these naysayers even know that the righteousness of God refers to Christ being without sin, and we also become without sin, by the washing of regeneration in Him.

The washing of regeneration is not imputation.
 

KenH

Well-Known Member
we are not made the righteousness of God by imputation.

Another rant against the gospel by Van.

Folks, seriously, do not follow after Van and his false teaching on the vitally important subject of standing before God clothed with the perfect righteousness of the Lord Jesus Christ as the Surety for His people, God's elect.

Romans 4:6
Even as David also describeth the blessedness of the man, unto whom God imputeth righteousness without works.

(emphasis mine)
 

Van

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Another rant against the gospel by Van.

Folks, seriously, do not follow after Van and his false teaching on the vitally important subject of standing before God clothed with the perfect righteousness of the Lord Jesus Christ as the Surety for His people, God's elect.

Romans 4:6
Even as David also describeth the blessedness of the man, unto whom God imputeth righteousness without works.

(emphasis mine)
Yet another post of gibberish, running away from truth. avoiding the issue that we did not become the righteousness of God by imputation.

I do not believe any of these naysayers even know that the righteousness of God refers to Christ being without sin, and we also become without sin, by the washing of regeneration in Him.

The washing of regeneration is not imputation.
 

Ben1445

Well-Known Member
Ben asks for an explanation a 5 year old can understand. I understand personal incredulity is a fallacious argument.

Here is my guess at the question Ben claims not to understand: "Explain how Christ as a "made sinner was just.?"

Ben says he does not understand the question, perhaps because of the grammar.

Explain asks Ben to tell me how Christ, as a made sinner could be just.

First we start with Christ sacrificing His life, the just (Christ) for the unjust (fallen humanity).

Fallen humanity can not be considered just as we were "made sinners" thus unjust.

Christ can not be considered just if He too was a made sinner.

Therefore no one with a rational mind can explain the false claim Christ was made a sinner, what many mistranslations of 2 Corinthians 5:21 say.

The correct translation would read, God treated Christ as sin on our behalf.
Thanks for that little bit of clarification.
A simple, “I am referring to the text of 2 Corinthians 5:21. I don’t know how you missed that” would have brought me up to speed much faster and been far more edifying.
 
Top