Brightfame52
Well-Known Member
Exegete itThis verse was brought up to show that The Master (Jesus) bought false prophets that introduce destructive heresies.
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Exegete itThis verse was brought up to show that The Master (Jesus) bought false prophets that introduce destructive heresies.
You claimed that “bought” means something other than “redeemed”. Both are financial purchase terms. So you exegete it! What else can bought mean?Exegete it
You claimed that “bought” means something other than “redeemed”. Both are financial purchase terms. So you exegete it! What else can bought mean?
All you have said is that “bought” isnt redeemed. What does your Calvinism tell you it means? What buying did Jesus do of these people? I wait with baited breath… I prophesy the replies now:
”No, you first”
”Just running your mouth”
”Exegete it”
”What about X verse over here”
”He blinded your eyes”
You claimed that “bought” means something other than “redeemed”. Both are financial purchase terms. So you exegete it! What else can bought mean?
All you have said is that “bought” isnt redeemed. What does your Calvinism tell you it means? What buying did Jesus do of these people? I wait with baited breath… I prophesy the replies now:
”No, you first”
”Just running your mouth”
”Exegete it”
”What about X verse over here”
”He blinded your eyes”
Your post explains 1 Pet 1.Redeems those He died for from the Prison of Unbelief !
2 Peter 2:1 But there were false prophets also among the people, even as there shall be false teachers among you, who privily shall bring in damnable heresies, even denying the Lord that bought them, and bring upon themselves swift destruction. Thats not about blood redemption. Peter had...www.baptistboard.com
Yeah. I didnt bring up 2 Pet 2:1, I explained what I posted. It tells me Christ blood redeemed from a vain conversation and its a different word for redeemed by blood. So 2 Pet 2:1 says nothing about Christ redeeming by His blood. If thats what it means, exegete it and prove it, otherwise its posted for nothing. Im explaining how them He died for are redeemed from prison of unbelief. No one has refuted it yetYour post explains 1 Pet 1.
You dont say what “bought” means in 2 Pet 2:1. You just say it’s not blood redemption… you dont say why. You dont say what 2 Pet 2 means, so here I wait.
Thats a different word for redeem
Just because Peter used the word “bought” doesn’t mean he’s not talking about the same thing. This is a synonym to talk about being purchased, redeemed, saved. In fact, both first Peter and second Peter passages referred to salvation and being purchased by the Lord.Yeah. I didnt bring up 2 Pet 2:1, I explained what I posted. It tells me Christ blood redeemed from a vain conversation and its a different word for redeemed by blood. So 2 Pet 2:1 says nothing about Christ redeeming by His blood. If thats what it means, exegete it and prove it, otherwise its posted for nothing. Im explaining how them He died for are redeemed from prison of unbelief. No one has refuted it yet
What you really must explain is how the bought elect can deny the Lord.Thats not about blood redemption. Peter had already taught them about blood redemption by Christ here 1 Pet 1:18-19
18 forasmuch as ye know that ye were not redeemed with corruptible things, as silver and gold, from your vain conversation received by tradition from your fathers; 19 but with the precious blood of Christ, as of a lamb without blemish and without spot:
Thats a different word for redeem by Christ and different results. So its incumbent on you to exegete 2 Pet 2:1 and explain how and why its the same as 1 Pet 1 and why it contradcits it.
Exactly.Really does not take long to figure BF out.
I’d like to start a thread on corporate election since I’m going to be teaching through Ephesians one soon. Unfortunately, I’m concerned that BF will completely hijack a thread with multiple single posts and no substitute ability to move it forward. Not really interested in having that clog up a thread. Maybe if that happens, I could get a mod to help make sure it is productive.Exactly.
Without being enemies at some point, there is no need for reconciliation.So it comes out to be you dont believe a word of Rom 5:10
10 For if, when we were enemies, we were reconciled to God by the death of his Son, much more, being reconciled, we shall be saved by his life.
How are they saved according to this scripture
Yeah. I didnt bring up 2 Pet 2:1, I explained what I posted. It tells me Christ blood redeemed from a vain conversation and its a different word for redeemed by blood. So 2 Pet 2:1 says nothing about Christ redeeming by His blood. If thats what it means, exegete it and prove it, otherwise its posted for nothing. Im explaining how them He died for are redeemed from prison of unbelief. No one has refuted it yet