Here are a few sample claims made by KJV-only authors concerning the 1769 Oxford edition of the KJV.
Al Lacy maintained that "the 1769 edition of the 1611 King James Bible is PERFECT" (Can I Trust My Bible, p. 144). Al Lacy claimed: “The King James Bible we have today is the 1769 edition. You will please note that it is number SEVEN. There has never been another edition since” (Ibid.). Steve Combs declared: “The KJB went through several editions to correct printer errors and to standardize spelling. The final one was 1769” (So Shall, p. 165). Terence McLean asserted: “It is the 1769 edition which we now read” (History of Your Bible, p. 48). Terence McLean wrote: “Those are changes in orthography and calligraphy, not changes in the text of God’s perfectly preserved words in your King James Authorized 1769 Bible” (p. 49). Lawrence Bednar referred to “KJV language up-dating, up to the final 1769 edition” (Evidence, p. 72; see also p. 276). Lawrence Bednar claimed that “the finalized KJB text is inerrant” and that “inerrancy will extent to the final authorized 1769 KJB edition” (Case, p. 102). Jack Koons wrote: “Since the last correction made in 1769, there has been NO CHANGES (from an authentic King James Bible). The King James Version has remained unchanged for 248 years” (What Is so Special, p. 207). Joey Faust maintained that "nothing after 1769 is a true edition" (Common Man‘s Defense of KJV-onlyism, p. 43). William Sutton maintained that in 1769 “this would be the last time God’s fingerprints ever touched the Holy Bible” (Holy Bible Code, Vol. 7, p. 169). William Sutton claimed: “Upon His completion of the 1769 edition of The Holy Bible the Divine Author permanently departed from His creative work of the Bible. Thus it stands divinely authorized, complete, and perfect” (Ibid.). William Sutton asserted: “The only alterations made to the 1769 edition of the KJV were merely spelling and capitalization; no words were ever changed” (p. 675). William Sutton claimed: “From 1769 onward this revised edition became God’s final and finished work” (p. 677).
D. A. Waite claimed that the KJV is “a fixed phenomenon” and he asserted: “there hasn’t been any changes in it for centuries. In the 1700’s there were some changes in spelling, but other than that it has stayed the same for centuries” (Central Seminary Refuted, p. 141). Floyd Jones asserted: “To summarize, the character of the textual changes is that of obvious printing errors, not changes made to alter the reading” (Which Version, 21st edition, p. 75). Phil Stringer claimed: “A 1769 Paris-Blayney revision of the King James Bible is properly called a 1611 King James Bible because no new translation work has been done and no new textual authority has been introduced” (Unbroken Bible, p. 288). Jonathan Wheatley wrote: “The uniformity of spelling (orthography) of the written English language was not settled in the English Bible until after the publication of Samuel Johnson’s English dictionary in 1755, and the subsequent publication of the 1769 Standard Oxford Revision by Dr. Blayney” (Unique Words, p. 14, footnote 7). Cody Parrott claimed: “One little-known fact is that for the past 250 years, all ‘King James Version’ Bibles published anywhere by any publisher are actually Bla[y]ney’s 1769 Revised Oxford Edition of the 1611 King James Bible” (Translation War, p. 199).
