Is this Trump's WORST NIGHTMARE

[Conan]

 

[Salty]

This thread will be closed no sooner than 0610 GMT 1210 am (Mon) EDT / 910 pm PDT

 

[KenH]

Its not that the Dems would give Nukes to Iran - rather - they would do nothing to stop Iran from developing the Nuke!

Since the North Korean government, an enemy of the United States government, has around 50 nuclear weapons and tests missiles(by the way, there has never been any evidence provided that the Iranian government has ever come close to developing a nuclear weapon), do you want the United States government to go to war with the North Korean government and try to destroy its nuclear weapon stockpile?

Also, since the Russian government and the Chinese government, enemies of the United States government, have enough nuclear weapons to destroy the people of the United States, do you want the United States government to go to war with those two governments and try to destroy their nuclear weapon stockpiles?

 

[Conan]

Yes, I have been reading about this (it got me curious). Reading Canadian sites it serms accidentally calling a man who identifies as a woman "she" will probably not qualify as hate speech.

BUT knowing that a man identifies identifies as a woman and not calling him "she" is hate speech and can be prosecuted as such.


Looked at the standard on this. Natural death must be reasonably forseeable, the person must be at least 18 years old.

People suffering solely from mental illness are temporary excluded from assisted suicide until March 17, 2027.

This is a scary law.

The US did capture him under US law, but per US law he was not the leader of Venezuela.

This goes to my question.

Canada has violated several international laws over the past decade. I do not know if this was in accordance with Canadian law.

The question was which law, if in opposition, should Canada follow, international law or Canadian law?


I am not making excuses for the US. I am looking at the reasons used. Personally I believe the true reasons were monetary.

It is unlawful to kidnap another head of State. It is totally against all international law. Trump acts above the law. He may be. But because Trump breaks the Law does not make it right. Maduros won his election by a landslide. And the United States breaks election Laws according to Trump. According to Trump Biden stole the election . I admit I thought he was right but what does that make us? We are either election breakers or Trump is a liar.

 

[Conan]

@Silverhair

 

[JonC]

It is unlawful to kidnap another head of State.

But he was not the head of State. He was recalled May 2017 and the CNE essentually put him in the position. From there he committed the worst human rights violations in Venezuela's history. Your argument works only from a communist perspective (otherwise his position is viewed as illegitimate).

Trump acts above the law. He may be. But because Trump breaks the Law does not make it right.

Trump acted in opposition to UN law. Hence my question about which law should the US follow when the UN law conflicts with US law.

I was not saying Trump, Clinton, Obama, etc. seeking to capture the man and Trump foing it was right or wrong.

We are talking about politics. There is no right, only varying degrees of wrong.

Maduros won his election by a landslide.

No, he did not win the election. The Venezuelan company that provided the voting machines verified they had been tampered with by the CNE (although more votes than people voting was a good hint)

Your practice of getting your news from socialist outlets is problematic. The actual reports are available.

And the United States breaks election Laws according to Trump. According to Trump Biden stole the election .

No, the United States does not break election laws. Our elections are not set up that way. Parties break election laws. Always have and always will.

Yes, Trump said the election was stolen. Clinton said the election was stolen. They exaggerate election fraud. Only their sheeple believe them (the fraud has not been proven enough to change the election results in favor of either, regardless of what they claim.

We are either election breakers or Trump is a liar.

Not me. Trump pointed to specific states. I do not live there and I do not vote.

But yes, yes, yes...Trump said the election was stolen when he lost and Harris, Clinton, Biden, and Obama said the election wss stolen when Trump won.

They are all liars. That is politics. Why do you think evil will do right? Elections are about gaining power for a party at all costs.

I am not defending Trump (I did not vote for him). But at the same time I appreciate a dictator and mass murderer being removed from the nation he victimized.

You are so caught up in Trump that you cannot rejoice with the Venezuelians. For the first time in decades their economy is taking sn upward turn (slowly). The man who instilled himself as dictator and executed over 8,000 political rivals has been captured.
A terrorist is captured and you only complain that it violated UN law.

It is not about Trump. He makes everything anout himself. You are doing the same. Trump is evil. But the outcome is what we can rejoice in

 

[Silverhair]

The US has been a greater giver (both now and historically).

That still does not give them the right to ignore the law.

You mentioned the US violating UN law to enforce US law.

You seem to think being a rogue state is a good thing.

You are telling me that the EU and Canada can make up the loss that would occur should the US stop providing for their defense. How?

What makes you think they would not? If we depended upon the US to defend us then from what we have seen in Vietnam, Iraq and Iran we would be better of throwing stones.

The US is good at starting wars but not so good fighting them.

No, the US is a giver in the relationship. Many here believe the US gives far too much and should use that domestically.

What the US seems to be good at is causing unrest in the world by thinking they can tell everyone how to live. Contrary to what you may believe, not everyone wants to be like the Americans.


I understand that you want to defend the US but if they ignore laws or invade other countries because they think they have the right to do so then they are just a rogue state and no better than Russia.

 

[Silverhair]

Yes, I have been reading about this (it got me curious). Reading Canadian sites it serms accidentally calling a man who identifies as a woman "she" will probably not qualify as hate speech.

BUT knowing that a man identifies identifies as a woman and not calling him "she" is hate speech and can be prosecuted as such.

We still circle back to what I posted re free speech.

But you can thank the failed liberal Trudeau for that stupid rule. But then again there any number of dumb laws on the books in the Canada and the US.

Looked at the standard on this. Natural death must be reasonably forseeable, the person must be at least 18 years old.

People suffering solely from mental illness are temporary excluded from assisted suicide until March 17, 2027.

This is a scary law.

I agree.

The US did capture him under US law, but per US law he was not the leader of Venezuela.

But your US law does not apply outside the US. So the US invaded another country and kidnapped a person.

The question was which law, if in opposition, should Canada follow, international law or Canadian law?

Canadian law in Canada and the laws of the country they are in if not Canada.

 

[Silverhair]

@Silverhair

So if we believed that video Ukraine is able to push Russia back with only 10%.

 

[Salty]

This thread will be closed no sooner than 0610 GMT 1210 am (Mon) EDT / 910 pm PDT

This thread is closed - feel free to start a new one