Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
How do Reformed Baptist churches differ from the SBC?
One places the burden of other’s eternal destiny on the backs of the saints, the other does not.
You mean that the person gets to choose whether they will trust in God or not just as the bible says.
I used to belong as a member of a Southern Baptist church.
What church did you end up at?I used to go to a church affiliated with the SBC, and while they didn't identify as reformed, they did lean on the work of Calvinist theologians like John MacArthur and Warren Wiersbe during our Bible study sessions. Eventually, the senior pastor decided to step down, and his son-in-law took the helm. Even though I thought he was a nice guy, unfortunately, I found his sermons to be lacking in substance, so I made the decision to move on and find a different church home.
What church did you end up at?
The Founders Movement (centered around Founders Ministries) is a Reformed Baptist movement within and adjacent to the Southern Baptist Convention (SBC).Is not the 'Founders' Movement part of SBC? Is it not Reformed in its theology?
I put the matter here because a lot of Southern Baptist churches are taking on reformed characteristics--elder-lead congregation, use of Crossway literature including the ESV, legally binding commitment of new members to the church's statement of faith, etc. It seems there is nothing about reformed theology or practice that would be anathema to the SBC. So why do they tend to remain independent?Reformed Baptist churches are generally distinguished from the SBC by their commitment to Calvinist theology, particularly the doctrines of election, predestination, and irresistible grace. They also typically practice covenant theology and hold to the 1689 London Baptist Confession of Faith.
The SBC, on the other hand, is a much broader denomination that includes both Calvinists and non-Calvinists, with many churches holding to a more traditional, non-Calvinist understanding of salvation. Both groups practice believer’s baptism by immersion, but they can differ significantly in how they understand salvation, God’s sovereignty, and the covenants in Scripture.
So why do they tend to remain independent?
How can a statement of faith be “legally binding”?I put the matter here because a lot of Southern Baptist churches are taking on reformed characteristics--elder-lead congregation, use of Crossway literature including the ESV, legally binding commitment of new members to the church's statement of faith, etc. It seems there is nothing about reformed theology or practice that would be anathema to the SBC. So why do they tend to remain independent?
No, I mean:
“For my yoke is easy, and my burden is light.”
There could be no heavier burden placed upon US than the responsibility of other’s eternal destiny. Christ didn’t put that burden on us, radical evangelism did.
We are not responsible for another person’s eternal destiny, but we are responsible for trying to persuade men to be reconciled to God.God did not make us responsible for another's eternal destiny, that is each persons responsibility.
Evangelism does not remove that responsibility. We can present the gospel but we cannot make them trust in Christ Jesus for their salvation.
God did not make us responsible for another's eternal destiny, that is each persons responsibility.
Evangelism does not remove that responsibility. We can present the gospel but we cannot make them trust in Christ Jesus for their salvation.
Nope. Calvinists do not believe “God did not make us responsible for another's eternal destiny, that is each persons responsibility.”Wow Silv! That’s kinda what those mean ol’ Calvinists believe!