• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Reformed Baptists

kyredneck

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
You mean that the person gets to choose whether they will trust in God or not just as the bible says.

No, I mean:

“For my yoke is easy, and my burden is light.”

There could be no heavier burden placed upon US than the responsibility of other’s eternal destiny. Christ didn’t put that burden on us, radical evangelism did.
 

Kai

Active Member
Reformed Baptist churches are generally distinguished from the SBC by their commitment to Calvinist theology, particularly the doctrines of election, predestination, and irresistible grace. They also typically practice covenant theology and hold to the 1689 London Baptist Confession of Faith.

The SBC, on the other hand, is a much broader denomination that includes both Calvinists and non-Calvinists, with many churches holding to a more traditional, non-Calvinist understanding of salvation. Both groups practice believer’s baptism by immersion, but they can differ significantly in how they understand salvation, God’s sovereignty, and the covenants in Scripture.
 

Ascetic X

Well-Known Member
I used to belong as a member of a Southern Baptist church.

Now I am attending, and hoping to join, an Independent “Baptistic” Bible Church.

I have attended Assembly of God, Nazarene, Catholic, Presbyterian, Church of Christ, Methodist, Lutheran, Russian Orthodox, Eastern Orthodox churches.

This independent Bible church is the most suitable church for me, even though they are of Reformed theology, and I am very opposed to TULIP Calvinism.

I love how they preach from the Bible and sing out of hymnals!
 

Kai

Active Member
I used to belong as a member of a Southern Baptist church.

I used to go to a church affiliated with the SBC, and while they didn't identify as reformed, they did lean on the work of Calvinist theologians like John MacArthur and Warren Wiersbe during our Bible study sessions. Eventually, the senior pastor decided to step down, and his son-in-law took the helm. Even though I thought he was a nice guy, unfortunately, I found his sermons to be lacking in substance, so I made the decision to move on and find a different church home.
 

Ascetic X

Well-Known Member
I used to go to a church affiliated with the SBC, and while they didn't identify as reformed, they did lean on the work of Calvinist theologians like John MacArthur and Warren Wiersbe during our Bible study sessions. Eventually, the senior pastor decided to step down, and his son-in-law took the helm. Even though I thought he was a nice guy, unfortunately, I found his sermons to be lacking in substance, so I made the decision to move on and find a different church home.
What church did you end up at?
 

KenH

Well-Known Member
There are also Sovereign Grace Baptists, such as the church I attend - Grace Baptist Church of Ruston, Louisiana.

The entry in Wikipedia on "Reformed Baptists" has this section on "Sovereign Grace Baptists":

"All of these groups generally agree with the Five Points of Calvinism - Total Depravity, Unconditional Election, Limited Atonement, Irresistible Grace, and Perseverance of the Saints. Groups calling themselves "Sovereign Grace Baptists" have been particularly influenced by the writings of John Gill in the 18th century. Among American Baptists who have revived such Calvinist ideas were Rolfe P. Barnard and Henry T. Mahan, who organised the first Sovereign Grace Bible Conference in Ashland, Kentucky, in 1954, though groups designated as Sovereign Grace are not necessarily connected to them."

It is from Henry Mahan that the pastor of Grace Baptist Church of Ruston, Louisiana, first heard the gospel of Christ, and then I heard it from him in 2021.
 

atpollard

Well-Known Member
I have never encountered a Southern Baptist Church that was 100% General Baptists (no Particular Baptists … the Baptist term for Reformed since we do not spring from the “Reformation” tree). So I see no “either/or” to choose between. I have been in Baptist (and non-Baptist) churches with both “Calvinistic” and “Arminian” leaning pastors. The CHURCH (assembly of believers) almost without exception contained both (and many shades in between).
 

Zenas

Active Member
Reformed Baptist churches are generally distinguished from the SBC by their commitment to Calvinist theology, particularly the doctrines of election, predestination, and irresistible grace. They also typically practice covenant theology and hold to the 1689 London Baptist Confession of Faith.

The SBC, on the other hand, is a much broader denomination that includes both Calvinists and non-Calvinists, with many churches holding to a more traditional, non-Calvinist understanding of salvation. Both groups practice believer’s baptism by immersion, but they can differ significantly in how they understand salvation, God’s sovereignty, and the covenants in Scripture.
I put the matter here because a lot of Southern Baptist churches are taking on reformed characteristics--elder-lead congregation, use of Crossway literature including the ESV, legally binding commitment of new members to the church's statement of faith, etc. It seems there is nothing about reformed theology or practice that would be anathema to the SBC. So why do they tend to remain independent?
 

Kai

Active Member
So why do they tend to remain independent?

I think the main reason is that Reformed Baptist churches often want to maintain a distinct theological identity, particularly regarding Calvinism and covenant theology. The SBC allows considerable theological diversity, so a church can be Calvinistic and remain Southern Baptist. But some Reformed Baptists prefer the autonomy and doctrinal consistency of being independent, rather than working within a convention that includes both Calvinists and non-Calvinists.
 

Ascetic X

Well-Known Member
I put the matter here because a lot of Southern Baptist churches are taking on reformed characteristics--elder-lead congregation, use of Crossway literature including the ESV, legally binding commitment of new members to the church's statement of faith, etc. It seems there is nothing about reformed theology or practice that would be anathema to the SBC. So why do they tend to remain independent?
How can a statement of faith be “legally binding”?
 

Silverhair

Well-Known Member
No, I mean:

“For my yoke is easy, and my burden is light.”

There could be no heavier burden placed upon US than the responsibility of other’s eternal destiny. Christ didn’t put that burden on us, radical evangelism did.

God did not make us responsible for another's eternal destiny, that is each persons responsibility.

Evangelism does not remove that responsibility. We can present the gospel but we cannot make them trust in Christ Jesus for their salvation.
 

Ascetic X

Well-Known Member
God did not make us responsible for another's eternal destiny, that is each persons responsibility.

Evangelism does not remove that responsibility. We can present the gospel but we cannot make them trust in Christ Jesus for their salvation.
We are not responsible for another person’s eternal destiny, but we are responsible for trying to persuade men to be reconciled to God.


2 Corinthians 5

18 And all things are of God, who hath reconciled us to himself by Jesus Christ, and hath given to us the ministry of reconciliation;

19 To wit, that God was in Christ, reconciling the world unto himself, not imputing their trespasses unto them; and hath committed unto us the word of reconciliation.

20 Now then we are ambassadors for Christ, as though God did beseech you by us: we pray you in Christ's stead, be ye reconciled to God.

21 For he hath made him to be sin for us, who knew no sin; that we might be made the righteousness of God in him.
 

kyredneck

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
God did not make us responsible for another's eternal destiny, that is each persons responsibility.

Evangelism does not remove that responsibility. We can present the gospel but we cannot make them trust in Christ Jesus for their salvation.

Wow Silv! That’s kinda what those mean ol’ Calvinists believe!
 

Ascetic X

Well-Known Member
Wow Silv! That’s kinda what those mean ol’ Calvinists believe!
Nope. Calvinists do not believe “God did not make us responsible for another's eternal destiny, that is each persons responsibility.”

They believe the person has no responsibility, God does everything, including putting repentance into them.
 
Top