Recent content by Conan

https://www.thetextofthegospels.com/2025/07/byzantine-friendly-new-testaments-in.html

You could certainly be correct here. There are no committee Byzantine translations that I am aware of. I like all Byzantine New Testaments that I have seen though. https://archive.org/details/tcent

The NASB is a committee Version. The World English Bible may be from one or only a few Translators. Very excellent, but not a committee Version. Of course William Tyndale was the best Translator in English . So I do not have anything against one man translations.

A good version. 2 thumbs up

Majority Text. Byzantine Text and Family 35 are 98 & 1/2 % alike.

I really liked the New American Standard Bible. But they should update to the Greek Byzantine Text. They would have had the best translation based on quite possibly the best Greek Text.

You are blaming all that on a Bible translation? Pretty sure those Pentecostals were using KJVs.

This collection of various readings in the margin distinguished Estienne's third edition as the first Greek text with a critical apparatus, and greatly enhanced the reputation of the text. It was thought by many that Estienne had edited his text directly from these manuscripts, and indeed...

No they do not . That is false witness. Mark the person who told you that as unreliable.

Isn't Iran the last on the list of nations to invade? Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Syria, Sudan , Lebanon, Iran? Remember Gen Wesly Clark revealed to the press the Bush Administrations list of 7 nations to be invaded in 5 years? This conflict with Iran was planned long ago. And since we are getting...

The NKJV is based on the Textus Receptus just like the KJV is. It has some Majority Text readings in the footnotes when they differ, as well as Critical Text footnotes when they differ.

Tyndale 1534 facsimile. This Jesus Christ cam by water and blood. And it is the sprete that beareth witness / because the sprete ys truth. (for there are thre which beare recorde in heaven / the father / the word / and the holy goost. And these thre are one) for there are thre which beare...

So then when all of these agree , which is the overwhelming majority of the time, we have undisputed the Original Text. It is only when there is a serious Variant , that there is any doubt. Which rarely, but does occasionally happen.

F.H.A. Scrivener, The Authorized Edition of the English Bible (1611), its subsequent Reprints and modern Representatives. Cambridge: University Press, 1884. This is the definitive work on the textual sources and history of the Authorized Version

They are not lies. You are rather in denial that they happened. Here is one source you can see some changes in. https://www.bible-researcher.com/canon10.html