Recent content by JesusFan

Big difference is that JW see Jesus actually was Michael archangel before Incarnation, while those such as Henry, Calvin, and Gill saw Him as preincarnated Christ as still very God being called michael as in Commander of armies in heavenly realm Both of them however were still wrong

Big difference is that JW see Jesus actually was Michael archangel before Incarnation, while those such as Henry, Calvin, and Gill saw Him as preincarnated Christ as still very God being called michael as in Commander of armies in heavenly realm Both of them however were still wrong

That Physical body gets raised up when glorified

Think that paul in Romans Chapter 8 gives you the answer

Jesus stated cleatrly that ALL that the Ftaher gave to Him to save shall stay saved, as He will lose NONE

So was Jesus and our resurrection physical in nature then? And I hold to CT theology, but Historical premil position

Very important to state that none of them held jesus to be the archangel Michael, as held by JW

Actually, wasn';t what we called Reformed/Calvinism more what Beza and Dort defined it as being, not so much Calvin?

Michael was not Jesus

Shoudl also add, IF you hold to can lose salvation, do you agree with Hebrews can never get it back?

So did Jesus have a physical resurrection, and will we?

All calvinists would affirm all 5 points of DOG

Disagree on limiutes atonement, which is the one doctrine of Grace majority disagree with with the "5 pointers"

Think that the english language had changed just between 1611 and 1769 itself that they were hundreds of real text changes , not just spelling and printing issues

Think those who hold to that heresy regrading nature and person of Jesus also tie it into when Jesus returns, with the voice of the arch angel Yes, both John Calvin and John Gill, among other historical Protestant theologians, identified Michael the Archangel as a title for the pre-incarnate...