Yes, deliberately so.
I am 99% sure that you are operating under a flawed definition of "Free Will" [speaking from the Philosophical definition of Free Will ... in popular vernacular, "Free Will" has as many definitions as "Calvinism" ... one per person using the term]. Any response I made to your comment would not lead to productive conversation.
People are completely free to choose to accept God's offer or reject God's offer and because of SOMETHING, natural man chooses to reject God's offer 100% of the time. This prompts a response on God's part to change that SOMETHING, which then allows people to freely choose to accept God's offer 100% of the time. Scripture frequently uses terms like "draw" or or "gift" and references to a "heart" or the metaphor of "slave" to describe this REALITY.
I have no particular desire to argue over the nature or existence of the SOMETHING, to me it seems both Scripturally and empirically self evident - as is the "draw/gift" that transforms the "heart/slave" in the lives of some and not others. It is like arguing whether the earth is really flat or a sphere ... what could possibly be gained by trying to convince someone who insists that the earth is flat of the obvious truth (they will never believe and the truth is obvious to you).
So in reality you as a C/R do not actually have the ability to make freely evaluated comments. Your own philosophy negates that possibility. You are just regurgitating what it has been determined that you say. So you cannot logically argue any point.
That is the position your C/R determinism has put you in.
I am 100% sure that you are operating under a flawed definition of "Free Will" as you deny man's ability to make real free choices. C/R determinism requires that God determine all that happens and thus eliminates all possibility of man to make real choices. The LBCF, a reformed document, states your view clearly "God hath decreed in himself, from all eternity, by the most wise and holy counsel of His own will, freely and unchangeably, all things, whatsoever comes to pass" Then they try to soften those words when they saw the logical outcome of that stance.
Free will is the capacity for agents to choose between different possible courses of action (aka choosing “otherwise”). This does not require the person to be able to choose anything, nor does it require the absence of other influencing factors such as creation, conviction of sin, the gospel message, etc. It only requires the ability for a person confronted with a decision to be able to choose from among one or more possible options.
Free will is closely linked to the concepts of moral responsibility, praise, guilt, sin, and other judgements which apply only to actions that are freely chosen.
When you look at scripture through the cracked lens of the C/R it is a distorted view that you will see.
I do not have to filter the word of God through some man-make philosophy as you do. The truth of the bible is obvious to me,